<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1556-276X-7-432</ui>
	<ji>1556-276X</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Nano Express</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Improved field emission stability from single-walled carbon nanotubes chemically attached to silicon</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes"><snm>Shearer</snm><mi>J</mi><fnm>Cameron</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>cameron.shearer@uni-muenster.de</email></au>
				<au id="A2"><snm>Fahy</snm><fnm>Adam</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>adam.fahy@gmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A3"><snm>Barr</snm><fnm>Matthew</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>matthew.g.barr@gmail.com</email></au>
				<au id="A4"><snm>Dastoor</snm><mi>C</mi><fnm>Paul</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>paul.dastoor@newcastle.edu.au</email></au>
				<au id="A5"><snm>Shapter</snm><mi>G</mi><fnm>Joseph</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>joe.shapter@flinders.edu.au</email></au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1"><p>Institut f&#252;r Physikalische Chemie, Westf&#228;lische Wilhelms-Universit&#228;t M&#252;nster, M&#252;nster 48149, Germany</p></ins>
				<ins id="I2"><p>Flinders Centre for Nanoscale Science and Technology, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide 5042, Australia</p></ins>
				<ins id="I3"><p>Centre for Organic Electronics, School of Physics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Newcastle, 2308, Australia</p></ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Nanoscale Research Letters</source>
			<section><title><p>Regular submissions</p></title></section><issn>1556-276X</issn>
			<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
			<volume>7</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>432</fpage>
			<url>http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/7/1/432</url>
			<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1556-276X-7-432</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">22853557</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history><rec><date><day>18</day><month>5</month><year>2012</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>16</day><month>7</month><year>2012</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>1</day><month>8</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
		<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Shearer et al.; licensee Springer.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
		<kwdg>
			<kwd>Single-walled carbon nanotubes</kwd>
			<kwd>Chemical attachment</kwd>
			<kwd>Field emission</kwd>
			<kwd>Field emission stability</kwd>
			<kwd>Nanoelectronics</kwd>
		</kwdg>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st><p>Here, we demonstrate the simple fabrication of a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) field emission electrode which shows excellent field emission characteristics and remarkable field emission stability without requiring posttreatment. Chemically functionalized SWCNTs were chemically attached to a silicon substrate. The chemical attachment led to vertical alignment of SWCNTs on the surface. Field emission sweeps and Fowler-Nordheim plots showed that the Si-SWCNT electrodes field emit with a low turn-on electric field of 1.5 V&#8201;&#956;m<sup>&#8722;1</sup> and high electric field enhancement factor of 3,965. The Si-SWCNT electrodes were shown to maintain a current density of &gt;740 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> for 15 h with negligible change in applied voltage. The results indicate that adhesion strength between the SWCNTs and substrate is a much greater factor in field emission stability than previously reported.</p>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st><p>Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have a high aspect ratio and high electrical conductivity which make them prime candidates for field emission electrodes <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The practical application of a CNT-based field emission device requires both a low turn-on electric field (<it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub>) and a stable output current <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are accepted to have excellent field emission properties including a low turn-on field and high electric field enhancement factor (<it>&#946;</it>) since their small diameter provides the highest aspect ratio compared with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Conversely, field emission from SWCNTs is usually regarded to be fragile because the single-shelled SWCNTs are less resilient to emission degradation mechanisms such as ion bombardment and Joule heating. Recently, much work has focused upon improving the field emission properties of MWCNTs due to their inherent emission stability <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Posttreatments to SWCNT films, such as plasma exposure, have been shown to significantly increase emission stability but at the cost of increasing <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub>
				<abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Improving the emission stability from SWCNT electrodes without adversely affecting <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub> and <it>&#946;</it> is an ultimate goal in the field <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>We have recently reported field emission from SWCNTs chemically attached to silicon and showed that these devices could withstand field emission current densities up to 500 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> and were relatively stable, with the voltage required to maintain a current density of 95 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> only increasing by 15% after 15 h and by 36% after 65 h <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. More recently, we investigated field emission properties and stability from functionalized single-, double-, and multi-walled CNTs chemically attached to silicon where we found that the degree of functionalization played a major role in emission stability <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Recent experiments on Si-SWCNT electrodes have shown that a 2-h attachment time yields superior photovoltaic and electrochemical devices <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The field emission stability of 2-h Si-SWCNT electrodes has not been previously investigated. In this letter, we improve significantly upon previous Si-SWCNT electrodes and demonstrate that the chemical attachment of SWCNTs to a silicon substrate is a simple route toward the fabrication of a SWCNT electrode with stable emission while maintaining excellent values for <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub> and <it>&#946;</it>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st><p>Si-SWCNT electrodes were fabricated following the chemical attachment of functionalized SWCNTs as described in detail elsewhere <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Briefly, n-type highly antimony-doped Si wafers were cut to 0.25 cm<sup>2</sup> and cleaned ultrasonically in acetone for 2 min. The Si wafers were then hydroxylated by stepwise immersion in 1:1:5 NH<sub>4</sub>OH:H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub>O followed by HCl:H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub>O for 20 min at 80&#176;C. The wafers were then incubated for 2 h in a solution of dimethyl sulfoxide containing 0.2 mg mL<sup>&#8722;1</sup> carboxylic acid-functionalized SWCNTs and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The Si-SWCNT wafers were then washed ultrasonically for 2 min and dried in a stream of nitrogen. Field emission measurements were collected using a parallel plate setup with Si-SWCNT electrodes as the cathode and a stainless steel disk as the anode separated by 1.82 mm as determined by a micrometer screw <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. All measurements were taken using a LabVIEW-controlled Keithley source measure unit (Keithley Instruments Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA). The base pressure of the field emission testing system was &lt;1&#8201;&#215;&#8201;10<sup>&#8722;8</sup> Torr.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results and discussion</p>
			</st><p>Figure<figr fid="F1">1</figr> presents an atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of the prepared Si-SWCNT electrode. The SWCNTs form vertically aligned bundles, consistent with previous observations for SWCNTs chemically attached to substrates using this method <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Vertical alignment of the SWCNTs is due to two main effects: (a) the hydrophilic hydroxyl groups on the surface repel the hydrophobic walls of the SWCNTs, forcing the SWCNTs away from the surface; and (b) the high density of carboxylic acid groups on the ends of the SWCNTs promotes end-on surface attachment. The SWCNT bundle density is in the order of approximately 1&#8201;&#215;&#8201;10<sup>9</sup> cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> with heights of the features observed ranging from 20 to 100 nm with an average bundle diameter of 75 nm as determined by AFM analysis. </p>
			<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>AFM image of SWCNTs vertically aligned on silicon</p></caption><text>
   <p>
      <b>AFM image of SWCNTs vertically aligned on silicon.</b>
   </p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-7-432-1"/></fig><p>A field emission <it>J</it>
				<it>V</it> sweep and its corresponding Fowler-Nordheim (F-N) plot for the Si-SWCNT electrode is shown in Figure<figr fid="F2">2</figr>. The maximum field emission current density (<it>J</it>
				<sub>max</sub>) measured was 790 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> and was limited by the maximum current that could be supplied by the field emission apparatus, indicating that <it>J</it>
				<sub>max</sub> was actually higher than 790 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup>. Field emission is demonstrated by the highly linear F-N plot <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and from the slope of this plot, <it>&#946;</it> was calculated to be 3,965 (assuming a SWCNT work function of 4.8 eV) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In addition, these devices exhibited an <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub> (electric field for <it>J</it>&#8201;=&#8201;10 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup>) and an <it>E</it>
				<sub>th</sub> (electric field for <it>J</it>&#8201;=&#8201;100 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup>) of 1.5 V&#8201;&#956;m<sup>&#8722;1</sup> and 2.37 V&#8201;&#956;m<sup>&#8722;1</sup>, respectively. </p>
			<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Field emission <it>J</it>-<it>V</it> sweep from Si-SWCNT electrode with (inset) Fowler-Nordheim plot</p></caption><text>
   <p>
      <b>Field emission </b>
      <b>
         <it>J </it>
      </b>
      <b>-</b>
      <b>
         <it>V </it>
      </b>
      <b>sweep from Si-SWCNT electrode with (inset) Fowler-Nordheim plot.</b>
   </p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-7-432-2"/></fig><p>The low <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub> and high value for <it>&#946;</it> demonstrate that the Si-SWCNT electrode is an elite field emission device <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The measured values are perhaps surprising given the short length and wide bundle diameter of the SWCNTs as determined by AFM. We hypothesize that by using a solution containing SWCNTs with a variety of lengths, we have produced a surface whereby the electrical field screening between SWNTs is minimal, leading to the excellent field emission characteristics observed <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Indeed, this hypothesis is supported by Chhowalla et al<it>.</it> who showed that short and stubby CNTs outperformed taller and thinner CNTs <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. They argued that electrical field screening between adjacent CNTs was reduced when the CNT forest did not have a uniform height and the CNTs had a greater spacing.</p><p>The emission stability from the Si-SWCNT electrode was tested by monitoring the voltage required to maintain a current of 740 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> for 15 h. The variation of both the applied voltage (<it>V</it>-<it>t</it>) and the current density (<it>J</it>-<it>t</it>) as a function of time are presented in Figure<figr fid="F3">3</figr>. There appears to be three main regions to the <it>V</it>-<it>t</it> and <it>J</it>-<it>t</it> plots:</p><p indent="1">1. <it>For t&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.5 h</it>, the field emission is relatively unstable with both <it>V</it> and <it>J</it> fluctuating as a function of time, which is consistent with previous observations <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and is most probably related to field-induced desorption of adsorbates, causing fluctuations in both the work function and <it>&#946;</it>
				<abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p indent="1">2. <it>For 0.5&#8201;&lt;&#8201;t&#8201;&lt;&#8201;2.5 h</it>, <it>V</it> is essentially constant while <it>J</it> increases to 770 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> at <it>t</it>&#8201;=&#8201;2.5 h. This observation is consistent with a decrease in sample resistance due to the removal of amorphous carbon or non-emitting SWCNTs, resulting in improved field emission <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p indent="1">3. <it>For 2.5&#8201;&lt;&#8201;t&#8201;&lt;&#8201;15</it>, <it>J</it> remains constant while <it>V</it> increases slowly from 5,500 V to approximately 5,700 V at <it>t</it>&#8201;=&#8201;15 h, which is consistent with slow degradation of the field emission properties of the SWCNT film most likely due to ion bombardment and Joule heating processes <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
			<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Field emission stability of Si-SWCNT electrode</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Field emission stability of Si-SWCNT electrode.</b> Variation of both applied voltage (<it>V</it>-<it>t</it>) and current density (<it>J-t</it>) recorded with respect to time. Dashed red lines were added to signify the three regions of emission stability discussed in the text.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-7-432-3"/></fig><p>A total voltage change of 1.8% over 15 h for an applied current of approximately 750 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> is very low for a SWCNT field-emitting electrode. The only SWCNT electrode in the literature with greater stability was a screen-printed SWCNT electrode that was treated with an Xe/Ne plasma to improve stability to the point where a current density of 100 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> was maintained for &gt;50 h with minimal degradation <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. However, the plasma treatment increased the <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub> of the electrode from 2.9 V&#8201;&#956;m<sup>&#8722;1</sup> to 4.3 V&#8201;&#956;m<sup>&#8722;1</sup>, effectively negating the advantages of using SWCNTs. Moreover, the output current density described here is over seven times greater with negligible field emission degradation observed.</p><p>The highly stable electron field emission at a relatively high <it>J</it> that is observed for the Si-SWCNT electrodes reported in this letter is attributed to a number of factors. First, the strong chemical attachment between the SWCNTs and the substrate will reduce the occurrence of field-induced CNT desorption, resulting in a more consistent field emission. Second, the bundling of the SWCNTs on the surface may also assist with the observed low degradation, with the outermost SWCNTs protecting the inner SWCNTs from ion bombardment. Third, as we have previously shown, the high crystallinity of these SWCNTs improves emission stability <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Finally, we propose that variation in the length of the emitting structures results in low electric field screening of the surface and a concomitant large population of emitting SWCNTs, leading to a high field emission current density <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusions</p>
			</st><p>In summary, a field-emitting electrode consisting of SWCNTs chemically attached to a silicon substrate has been produced. The Si-SWCNT electrode was shown to field emit with an <it>E</it>
				<sub>to</sub> of 1.5 V&#8201;&#956;m<sup>&#8722;1</sup> and <it>&#946;</it> of 3,965. The emission was shown to be remarkably stable with a current of approximately 750 &#956;A cm<sup>&#8722;2</sup> maintained for 15 h with a net voltage increase of only 1.8%. The chemical attachment of SWCNTs to Si is a simple, upscalable approach to produce SWCNT field emission electron sources with excellent characteristics and stability without the need for posttreatment.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors' contributions</p>
			</st><p>CJS prepared and characterized the Si-SWCNT electrodes and completed the field emission experiments with the assistance of AF, MB, and PCD using an apparatus maintained by AF, MB, and PCD. The experiments were conceived by JS, PCD, and CJS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgments</p>
				</st><p>This work was funded by Flinders University, Westf&#228;lische Wilhelms-Universit&#228;t M&#252;nster, University of Newcastle and the Australian Research Council.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Author details</p>
				</st><p>
					<sup>1</sup>Institut f&#252;r Physikalische Chemie, Westf&#228;lische Wilhelms-Universit&#228;t M&#252;nster, M&#252;nster 48149, Germany. <sup>2</sup>Flinders Centre for Nanoscale Science and Technology, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide 5042, Australia. <sup>3</sup>Centre for Organic Electronics, School of Physics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Newcastle 2308, Australia.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wei</snm><fnm>BQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Vajtai</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Ajayan</snm><fnm>PM</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>79</volume><fpage>1172</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.1396632</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Field emission from carbon nanotubes: the first five years</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bonard</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Kind</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Stokli</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Nilsson</snm><fnm>L-O</fnm></au></aug><source>Solid State Electron</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>893</fpage><lpage>914</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0038-1101(00)00213-6</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Carbon nanotube electron sources and applications</p></title><aug><au><snm>de Jonge</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Bonard</snm><fnm>J-M</fnm></au></aug><source>Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>362</volume><fpage>2239</fpage><lpage>2266</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1098/rsta.2004.1438</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Field emission from single-walled carbon nanotube films</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bonard</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Salvetat</snm><fnm>J-P</fnm></au><au><snm>Stokli</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>De Heer</snm><fnm>WA</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>918</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.122037</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Carbon nanotube films as electron field emitters</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bonard</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Croci</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Klinke</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kurt</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Noury</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Weiss</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Carbon</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>1715</fpage><lpage>1728</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00011-8</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Carbon nanotubes as field emission sources</p></title><aug><au><snm>Milne</snm><fnm>WI</fnm></au><au><snm>Teo</snm><fnm>KBK</fnm></au><au><snm>Amaratunga</snm><fnm>GAJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Legagneux</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Gangloff</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Schnell</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Semet</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Thien Binh</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Groening</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mater Chem</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>933</fpage><lpage>943</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1039/b314155c</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Tailoring the electrostatic screening effect during field emission from hollow multiwalled carbon nanotube pillars</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hazra</snm><fnm>KS</fnm></au><au><snm>Gigras</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Misra</snm><fnm>DS</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>98</volume><fpage>123116</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.3565243</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>High emission current density, vertically aligned carbon nanotube mesh, field emitter array</p></title><aug><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Mann</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hasko</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Lei</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>BP</fnm></au><au><snm>Chu</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Pribat</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Amaratunga</snm><fnm>GAJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Milne</snm><fnm>WI</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>97</volume><fpage>3</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Improved emission stability of single-walled carbon nanotube field emitters by plasma treatment</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kim</snm><fnm>WS</fnm></au><au><snm>Lee</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Jeong</snm><fnm>TW</fnm></au><au><snm>Heo</snm><fnm>JN</fnm></au><au><snm>Kong</snm><fnm>BY</fnm></au><au><snm>Jin</snm><fnm>YW</fnm></au><au><snm>Kimb</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>87</volume><fpage>163112</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.2099538</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Highly resilient field emission from aligned single-walled carbon nanotube arrays chemically attached to n-type silicon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shearer</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Quinton</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Dastoor</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomsen</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>O&apos;Donnell</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mater Chem</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>5753</fpage><lpage>5760</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1039/b811546j</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Field emission from single-, double-, and multi-walled carbon nanotubes chemically attached to silicon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Shearer</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Fahy</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Barr</snm><fnm>MG</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>KE</fnm></au><au><snm>Dastoor</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au></aug><source>J Appl Phys</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>111</volume><fpage>044326</fpage><lpage>044328</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.3687363</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Photocurrent response from vertically aligned single-walled carbon nanotube arrays</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bissett</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au></aug><source>J Phys Chem C</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>114</volume><fpage>6778</fpage><lpage>6783</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jp1003193</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Patterned attachment of carbon nanotubes to silane modified silicon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Flavel</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Quinton</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>Carbon</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>2551</fpage><lpage>2558</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.026</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Electrochemical characterisation of patterned carbon nanotube electrodes on silane modified silicon</p></title><aug><au><snm>Flavel</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Quinton</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>Electrochim Acta</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>53</volume><fpage>5653</fpage><lpage>5659</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.022</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Direct attachment of well-aligned single-walled carbon nanotube architectures to silicon (100) surfaces: a simple approach for device assembly</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au><au><snm>Quinton</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnston</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Beattie</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Chem Chem Phys</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>510</fpage><lpage>520</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17216067</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Organizing single-walled carbon nanotubes on gold using a wet chemical self-assembling technique</p></title><aug><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Shen</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhu</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Hou</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Ying</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Langmuir</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>3569</fpage><lpage>3573</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/la9914110</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Ruthenium porphyrin functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube arrays-a step toward light harvesting antenna and multibit information storage</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Mathew</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Flavel</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnston</snm><fnm>MR</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au></aug><source>J Am Chem Soc</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>130</volume><fpage>8788</fpage><lpage>8796</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/ja801142k</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18597433</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Carbon nanotubes anchored to silicon for device fabrication</p></title><aug><au><snm>Constantopoulos</snm><fnm>KT</fnm></au><au><snm>Shearer</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ellis</snm><fnm>AV</fnm></au><au><snm>Voelcker</snm><fnm>NH</fnm></au><au><snm>Shapter</snm><fnm>JG</fnm></au></aug><source>Adv Mater</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>557</fpage><lpage>571</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/adma.200900945</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20217751</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Characterization of the field emission properties of individual thin carbon nanotubes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jonge</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Allioux</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Doytdcheva</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaiser</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Teo</snm><fnm>KBK</fnm></au><au><snm>Lacerda</snm><fnm>RG</fnm></au><au><snm>Milne</snm><fnm>WI</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>85</volume><fpage>1607</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.1786634</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Measuring the work function of carbon nanotubes with thermionic method</p></title><aug><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Sun</snm><fnm>Q</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhu</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Jiang</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>Q</fnm></au><au><snm>Fan</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Nano Lett</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>647</fpage><lpage>651</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/nl0730817</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18225940</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Inorganic semiconductor nanostructures and their field-emission applications</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Bando</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Gautam</snm><fnm>UK</fnm></au><au><snm>Ye</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Golberg</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mater Chem</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>18</volume><fpage>509</fpage><lpage>522</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1039/b712874f</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Synthesis and field emission properties of different ZnO nanostructure arrays</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Wong</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lei</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Nanoscale Res Lett</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>197</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1556-276X-7-197</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3337273</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22444723</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Scanning field emission from patterned carbon nanotube films</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nilsson</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Groening</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Emmenegger</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Kuettel</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Schaller</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Schlapbach</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Kind</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Bonard</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Kern</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>76</volume><fpage>2071</fpage><lpage>2073</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.126258</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Field emission from short and stubby vertically aligned carbon nanotubes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chhowalla</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ducati</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Rupesinghe</snm><fnm>NL</fnm></au><au><snm>Teo</snm><fnm>KBK</fnm></au><au><snm>Aramatunga</snm><fnm>GAJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>79</volume><fpage>2079</fpage><lpage>2081</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.1406557</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Stable, self-ballasting field emission from zinc oxide nanowires grown on an array of vertically aligned carbon nanofibers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Mann</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hiralal</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Unalan</snm><fnm>HE</fnm></au><au><snm>Lei</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>BP</fnm></au><au><snm>Chu</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Pribat</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Amaratunga</snm><fnm>GAJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Milne</snm><fnm>WI</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>96</volume><fpage>3</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Development of an improved field ionization detector incorporating a secondary electron stage</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fahy</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Donnell</snm><fnm>KMO</fnm></au><au><snm>Barr</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>XJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Allison</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Dastoor</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au></aug><source>Meas Sci Technol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>22</volume><fpage>115902</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1088/0957-0233/22/11/115902</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Field ionization detection of helium using a planar array of carbon nanotubes</p></title><aug><au><snm>O&apos;Donnell</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Fahy</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Barr</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Allison</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Dastoor</snm><fnm>PC</fnm></au></aug><source>Physical Review B</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>85</volume><fpage>113404</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>The current stability of field emission cathodes of carbon nanotubes under ion bombardment</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bormashov</snm><fnm>VS</fnm></au><au><snm>Baturin</snm><fnm>AS</fnm></au><au><snm>Nikolskiy</snm><fnm>KN</fnm></au><au><snm>Tchesov</snm><fnm>RG</fnm></au><au><snm>Sheshin</snm><fnm>EP</fnm></au></aug><source>Surf Interface Anal</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>39</volume><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>158</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/sia.2480</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Hot nanotubes: stable heating of individual multiwall carbon nanotubes to 2000 K induced by the field-emission current</p></title><aug><au><snm>Purcell</snm><fnm>ST</fnm></au><au><snm>Vincent</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Journet</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Binh</snm><fnm>VT</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>88</volume><fpage>105502</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11909368</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Modelization of resistive heating of carbon nanotubes during field emission</p></title><aug><au><snm>Vincent</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Purcell</snm><fnm>ST</fnm></au><au><snm>Journet</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Binh</snm><fnm>VT</fnm></au></aug><source>Physical Review B</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>075406</fpage></bibl></refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>