Due to their high efficiency, phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes [PHOLEDs] are promising light-emitting materials in organic light-emitting diodes [OLEDs]. An internal quantum efficiency of 100% could be realized in red and green PHOLEDs 12. However, the performance of blue PHOLEDs still needs to be improved for lighting applications. Light emission in PHOLEDs depends on the properties of the organic material in the devices 34. In particular, the energy level of the charge transport, host, and emitter materials influences the light-emitting efficiency. Besides, many different device architectures have attempted to improve the light-emitting efficiency of PHOLEDs. Hole and electron blocking layers or triplet exciton blocking layers [TEBLs] in PHOLEDs were introduced to confine both carriers and excitons within emitting layers [EMLs] 5. A double emitting layer structure was also employed in OLEDs by utilizing phosphorescent materials doped in two different hosts. As a result, these ways were effective in providing higher efficiency in PHOLEDs 6.

Another way to achieve high efficiency in OLEDs is to confine excitons inside the EML using the multiple quantum well [MQW] structure 7. Only a few reports concerning the MQW structure with good carrier and exciton confinement ability have been presented on OLEDs until quite recently. For example, Qiu et al. 7 improved the charge balance by utilizing an organic MQW structure to decelerate hole transportation. Huang et al. 8 used MQW structures to increase the carrier recombination efficiency, where both charges and excitons were confined to the EMLs. Park et al. 9 and Kim et al. 10 also reported similar triplet MQW structures. Recently, Liu et al. 11 proposed a non-doping EML method, instead of a host-emitter doping method, to improve the efficient triplet exciton confinement effect and the suppression of triplet-triplet annihilation that occurs via a single-step long range (Forster-type) energy transfer between excited molecules.

In this paper, we demonstrate efficient blue PHOLEDs by using iridium(III) bis[(4, 6-di-fluorophenyl)-pyridinato-N,C^2']picolinate [FIrpic] doped in N,N'-dicarbazolyl-3, 5-benzene [mCP] with charge control layers [CCLs] as an MQW structure. The device architecture was developed to confine excitons inside each EML and to manage triplet excitons by controlling the charge injection. A stacked recombination zone structure, which can prevent triplet quenching processes and triplet exciton confinement within recombination region, was designed, and its performance was compared with that of blue devices. In addition, a mixed CCL, which has a p-type mCP and an n-type 2, 2',2"-(1, 3, 5-benzenetryl)tris(1-phenyl)-1H-benzimidazol [TPBi], reduced the turn-on voltage and enhanced efficiencies by prohibiting triplet exciton diffusion out of each EML.

A glass substrate coated with a 180-nm-thick indium tin oxide [ITO] layer has a sheet resistance of 12 Ω/sq. The ITO was cleaned with acetone, methanol, distilled water, and isopropyl alcohol in an ultrasonic bath. The pre-cleaned ITO was then treated with O₂ plasma with the conditions of 2 × 10^-2 Torr, 125 W, and 2 min. All organic layers were sequentially deposited onto the substrate without breaking the vacuum at a pressure of 5 × 10^-7 Torr, using thermal evaporation equipment. The deposition rates were 1.0 to 1.1 Å/s for organic materials and 0.1 Å/s for lithium quinolate [Liq]. Finally, the aluminum cathode was deposited at a rate of 10 Å/s. The deposition rates were controlled with a quartz crystal monitor, and the doping concentrations of the emitters were optimized. After the organic and metal depositions, the devices were encapsulated in a glove box with O₂ and H₂O at concentrations below 1 ppm. A desiccant material consisting of barium oxide powder was used to absorb the residue moisture and oxygen in the encapsulated device. The devices had emission areas of 3 × 3 mm. The voltage, luminance, luminous efficiency, external quantum efficiency, power efficiency, and current density characteristics were measured and immediately recorded with a Chroma meter CS-1000A (Konica Minolta Holdings, Inc., Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan). The current and voltage were controlled with a measurement unit (model 236, Keithely Instruments Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA).

Figure 1a shows the chemical structures of FIrpic, mCP, and TPBi materials of blue PHOLEDs. FIrpic is the most well-known phosphorescent blue emitter, and mCP, as a carbazole-based material, is known to be a potential host material for blue electrophosphorescence because of its wide bandgap energy, high triplet energy, and good hole-transporting ability 121314. In addition, the high electron mobility of TPBi that provides good transport characteristics and barrier height of exciton diffusion out of EMLs do not exist due to the high triplet energy level of TPBi 15. Figure 1b shows the structures and energy level diagrams of blue PHOLEDs (devices A, B, C, and D). A series of phosphorescent blue devices were prepared with the structure of ITO as an anode; N,N'-bis-(1-naphyl)-N,N'-diphenyl-1, 1'-biphenyl-4, 4'-diamine (NPB, 50 nm) as a hole transporting layer; mCP (5 nm) as a TEBL; single EML (device A) or MQW structure EMLs (devices B, C, and D); TPBi (10 nm) as a TEBL and electron transporting layer [ETL]; 4, 7-diphenyl-1, 10-phenanthroline (BPhen, 30 nm) as an ETL; Liq (2 nm) as an electron injection layer; and aluminum (Al, 100 nm) as a cathode. As shown in Figure 1b, devices A, B, C, and D have the following EML structure: device A, FIrpic doped in mCP (30 nm) as a reference device; device B, n consists of [FIrpic doped in mCP (12.5 nm)]_{n = 2} and [CCL (mCP/TPBi = 1:1, 5 nm)]_{n = 1}; device C, n consists of [FIrpic doped in mCP (6.6 nm)]_{n = 3} and [CCL (mCP/TPBi = 1:1, 5 nm)]_{n = 2}; device D, n consists of [FIrpic doped in mCP (3.75 nm)]_{n = 4} and [CCL (mCP/TPBi = 1:1, 5 nm)]_{n = 3} as an MQW structure device, where the doping concentrations of FIrpic were optimized at 8 wt.%, respectively. MQW structure devices with CCLs, which were a mixed mCP of hole transport type and TPBi of electron transport type, can control the carrier movement with ease.

Figure 2 shows the lowest triplet states [T₁] of materials, such as TEBL, EML, and CCL, and the triplet exciton transfer mechanism in [EML]_{n = 2} and [CCL]_{n = 1} of the triplet MQW structure. Both triplet exciton transfer and energy transition are shown in dotted arrows, while phosphorescence from the T₁ state to the ground state is shown in solid arrows. The T₁ of mCP and TPBi were 2.90 eV and 2.73 eV, respectively, compared to 2.65 eV for FIrpic 1617. From their triplet state alignments, it can be speculated that there should be an efficient exothermic energy transfer from the host material triplet states to the FIrpic triplet state as well as an excellent triplet energy confinement on the FIrpic molecules within each EML. It is important to suppress any back energy transfer from the emitter triplet states to the others and enable consumption of all the electrically generated triplet excitons contributing to the emission.

Figure 3 shows luminance versus voltage characteristics, and the inset of Figure 3 shows current density versus voltage characteristics of devices A, B, C, and D. The dotted circle on the graph of Figure 3 shows reduction in the turn-on voltage from 3.5 V of the reference device (device A) to 2.5 V of the MQW structure device (device D). Device A showed a lower current density than devices B, C, and D at the whole driving voltages because holes and electrons can be easily transported through the CCLs, which were a mixed p-type mCP and n-type TPBi, for controlling the carrier movement. The CCLs, including the TPBi of good electron-transporting ability, enhanced the movement of electrons within the EML and helped the holes' movement slow down compared with conventional single EML without any CCLs. In this result, the turn-on voltage of devices B, C, and D are lower than that of device A. This also indicates that devices B, C, and D are better than device A for charge balance within EMLs.

The current density, luminous efficiency, and quantum efficiency of devices A, B, C, and D were compared, as shown in Figure 4a, b. The maximum luminous efficiencies of devices A, B, C, and D were 17.99, 19.46, 19.95, and 18.24 cd/A, and the maximum quantum efficiencies of devices A, B, C, and D were 9.08%, 10.02%, 10.05%, and 8.72%, respectively. As with device C with a triplet MQW structure, n consists of [FIrpic doped in mCP (6.6 nm)]_{n = 3}; [CCL (mCP/TPBi = 1:1, 5 nm)]_{n = 2} shows the best luminous and external quantum efficiency values of 19.95 cd/A and 10.05%, respectively. A comparison of the performance of these four devices is provided in Table 1. Device C exhibited higher efficiencies than devices A, B, and D due to the appropriate broad recombination zone by controlling the optimization of various EML thicknesses. In addition, the CCLs (mCP/TPBi) partially confine holes and electrons at the first EML, and some of the holes and electrons arrive at the other EML after transporting through the CCL. This phenomenon leads to the good charge balance and broad recombination zone for blue emission. We could control the optimization of EML thicknesses and enhance the charge balance within EMLs. As for various recombination zones, the triplet exciton diffusions are prohibited inside each EML by CCLs with a high triplet state (T₁). It effectively reduces exciton quenching processes, such as triplet-triplet annihilation and triplet-polaron annihilation 1819. In the case of device D with a triplet MQW structure, n consists of [FIrpic doped in mCP (3.75 nm)]_{n = 4}; [CCL (mCP/TPBi = 1:1, 5 nm)]_{n = 3} shows lower efficiencies than the other devices due to a relatively narrow emissive region.

In conclusion, the present study reports on the high efficiency blue PHOLEDs based on a carrier and triplet exciton confinement inside recombination zones by using a triplet multiple quantum structure. The triplet energies of mCP and TPBi are higher than those of FIrpic. Therefore, triplet multiple quantum structures with CCLs exhibited efficient carrier and triplet exciton confinement within each EML. Moreover, CCLs can play a role in carrier movement with ease and triplet exciton blocking as expected from high triplet energy levels. In the electrical characteristic results of blue devices, the properties of device C with three recombination zones were found to be superior to the properties of devices A, B, and D. We attribute such high efficiencies and reduced turn-on voltage to the following two advantages caused by the triplet MQW structure: (1) efficient charge and exciton confinement effect by CCLs and TEBLs with high triplet energy level and (2) charge transportation balance in each EML by CCLs with bipolar property. The described MQW device concept may be useful to fabricate highly efficient devices for future OLED display and lighting applications.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

SL and YK conceived and designed the experiments. SL and DL carried out the experiments with contributions from GH. KL and SY designed and synthesized the materials of OLEDs. DL measured the characterization of devices. WK provided the glass substrate coated with ITO. JK supervised the work. SL and YK wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.