<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1556-276X-6-206</ui><ji>1556-276X</ji><fm>
<dochead>Nano Express</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Magnetotransport in quantum cascade detectors: analyzing the current under illumination</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Jasnot</snm><fnm>Fran&#231;ois-R&#233;gis</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>jasnot@lpa.ens.fr</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>P&#233;r&#233;-Laperne</snm><fnm>Nicolas</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>nicolas.pere-laperne@lpa.ens.fr</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A3"><snm>de Vaulchier</snm><fnm>Louis-Anne</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>louis-anne.devaulchier@lpa.ens.fr</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Guldner</snm><fnm>Yves</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>yves.guldner@ens.fr</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Carosella</snm><fnm>Francesca</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>francesca.carosella@lpa.ens.fr</email></au>
<au id="A6"><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>Robson</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>robson.ferreira@lpa.ens.fr</email></au>
<au id="A7"><snm>Buffaz</snm><fnm>Amandine</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>amandine.buffaz@gmail.com</email></au>
<au id="A8"><snm>Doyennette</snm><fnm>Laetitia</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>laetitia.doyennette@univ-paris-diderot.fr</email></au>
<au id="A9"><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>Vincent</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>vincent.berger@univ-paris-diderot.fr</email></au>
<au id="A10"><snm>Carras</snm><fnm>Mathieu</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>mathieu.carras@thalesgroup.com</email></au>
<au id="A11"><snm>Marcadet</snm><fnm>Xavier</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>xavier.marcadet@thalesgroup.com</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Sup&#233;rieure CNRS (UMR 8551), 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Laboratoire Mat&#233;riaux et Ph&#233;nom&#232;nes Quantiques, Universit&#233; Denis Diderot - Paris 7, CNRS (UMR 7162), B&#226;timent Condorcet, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>Alcatel-Thales 3-5 lab, Route d&#233;partementale 128, 91767 Palaiseau Cedex, France</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Nanoscale Research Letters</source>
<issn>1556-276X</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>206</fpage>
<url>http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/206</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">21711714</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1556-276X-6-206</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>16</day><month>7</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>9</day><month>3</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>9</day><month>3</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>Jasnot et al; licensee Springer.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<p>Photocurrent measurements have been performed on a quantum cascade detector structure under strong magnetic field applied parallel to the growth axis. The photocurrent shows oscillations as a function of <it>B</it>. In order to describe that behavior, we have developed a rate equation model. The interpretation of the experimental data supports the idea that an elastic scattering contribution plays a central role in the behavior of those structures. We present a calculation of electron lifetime versus magnetic field which suggests that impurities scattering in the active region is the limiting factor. These experiments lead to a better understanding of these complex structures and give key parameters to optimize them further.</p>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><meta>
<classifications>
<classification id="ICSNN_2010" subtype="theme_series_title" type="BMC">International Conference on Superlattices, Nanostructures and Nanodevices (ICSNN 2010)</classification>
<classification id="ICSNN_2010" subtype="theme_series_editor" type="BMC"/>
</classifications>
</meta><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Introduction</p>
</st>
<p>The quantum cascade detector (QCD) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp> recently proposed and realized in both the mid-infrared <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and the THz <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp> range is a photovoltaic version of the quantum well infrared photodetector <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Their band structure are designed as quantum cascade lasers without any applied bias voltage <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. QCD are totally passive systems and show a response only to photon excitation. As such, the QCD structure is designed to generate an electronic displacement under illumination through a cascade of quantum levels without the need of an applied bias voltage.</p>
<p>In a semiconductor quantum well structure, magnetic field applied along the growth direction breaks the 2D in-plane continuum into discrete Landau levels (LLs). This experimental technique has been used to evaluate the different contributions of scattering mechanism in complex quantum cascade structures <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>We present in this article experimental photocurrent measurements under magnetic field applied along the growth direction. We develop a simple model of transport under illumination in a QCD. Through a comparison between experimental and calculation results, we evidence the mechanism limiting the response of the QCD.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Experimental setup and sample</p>
</st>
<p>The QCD under study is a GaAs/Al<sub>0.34</sub>Ga<sub>0.66</sub>As heterostructure with a detection wavelength of 8 <it>&#956;</it>m as described in ref. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. It consists of 40 identical periods of 7 coupled GaAs quantum wells. Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr> recalls the principle of the device.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Conduction band diagram of one period of an 8 <it>&#956;</it>m QCD showing the energy levels</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Conduction band diagram of one period of an 8 <it>&#956;</it>m QCD showing the energy levels</b>. Note that the ground state of the first QW belongs to the former period and is noted |down&#9002;. The arrows illustrate the electronic path during a detection event. The layer sequence is as follows 67.8/<b>56.5</b>/19.8/<b>39.6</b>/22.6/<b>31.1</b>/28.3/<b>31.1 </b>/33.9/<b>31.1</b>/39.6/<b>31.1</b>/45.2/<b>50.8 </b>(the barriers are represented in bold types). The <it>n</it>-doping of the large QW is 5 &#215; 10<sup>11 </sup>cm<sup>-2</sup>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-1"/></fig>
<p>QCDs are mounted inside an insert at the center of a superconducting coil where a magnetic field <it>B </it>up to 16 T can be applied parallel to the growth axis. Light is emitted by a globar source from an FTIR spectrometer and guided to the sample. The experiment consists in measuring the current under illumination (<it>I</it>
<sub>light</sub>) without any applied voltage at 80 K while the magnetic field is swept from 0 to 16 T.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>Experimental result is illustrated on Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>. The photocurrent shows oscillations as a function of the magnetic field, superimposed on a continuous decreasing background which is removed from the experimental data in Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>. Minima of current are located at <it>B </it>= 10.1, 11.4, 13.0, and 15.3 T and are in agreement with crossing of LL |up, 0&#9002; and LLs |down, <it>p</it>&#9002; represented on Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>. It leads to the conclusion that an elastic scattering mechanism is dominant in this structure and mainly involves the levels |up&#9002; and |down&#9002;.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Experimental result and LL fanchart</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Experimental result and LL fanchart</b>. <b>(a) </b>Current under illumination as a function of <it>B </it>at 80 K and at zero bias. <b>(b) </b><it>I</it><sub>light </sub>as a function of <it>B </it>where the decreasing background as been subtracted. <b>(c) </b>Fan chart of |up, 0&#9002; and |down, <it>p</it>&#9002; as a function of <it>B </it>taking into account the band non-parabolicity.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-2"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>We propose a model of transport in one period based on a rate equation approach. We assume that electrons are in the upper detector state |up&#9002; through absorption of a photon. Current as a function of lifetimes involved in this structure can be written:</p>
<p>
<display-formula id="M1">
<graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i1.gif"/>
</display-formula>
</p>
<p>The parameters &#945; and <it>N</it>
<sub>down </sub>are, respectively, the absorption factor and sheet density of |down&#9002; and are constant. The subscribe <it>c </it>stands for the whole cascade. The quantum efficiency QE is the ratio of the lifetime &#964;<sub>up-down </sub>divided by &#964;<sub>up-down </sub>+ &#964;<sub>up-c </sub>and corresponds to the fraction of electrons on the level |up&#9002; that contributes to the photocurrent. In our model we suppose that any incident photon generates an absorption between the levels |down&#9002; and |up&#9002;.</p>
<p>We present in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> the calculated scattering rates of the different processes at <it>B </it>= 0 T. For interface roughness, we used a Gaussian autocorrelation of the roughness, with an average height of &#916;= 2.8 &#197; and a correlation length of &#916; = 60 &#197;. LO phonon emission scattering rate has been calculated as in ref. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In our structure impurities scattering is the most efficient process <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Usually in GaAs quantum cascade structures this mechanism is neglected because the doped layers are not in the active region. In order to take into account the main scattering process we calculate ionized impurities scattering as a function of magnetic field. The details of the calculation are presented elsewhere <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Calculated scattering rates in s<sup>-1</sup>.</p></caption><tblbdy cols="3">
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Scattering mechanism</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>1/&#964;<sub>up-down</sub></b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>1/&#964;<sub>up-c</sub></b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="3">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LO phonon emission</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.0 &#215; 10<sup>11</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.2 &#215; 10<sup>11</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Interface roughness</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.0 &#215; 10<sup>11</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.6 &#215; 10<sup>12</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Impurity scattering</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.8 &#215; 10<sup>13</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.2 &#215; 10<sup>13</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Calculations are performed using different scattering processes for an electron in the |up&#9002; subband at <it>B </it>= 0 T.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr> represents a comparison between experimental data and electron-ionized impurities scattering time as a function of magnetic field. Figure <figr fid="F3">3b, c</figr> shows the two lifetimes involved in Equation 1 as a function of <it>B </it>calculated with electron-ionized impurities scattering. Figure <figr fid="F3">3d</figr> shows the calculation of the related quantum efficiency.</p>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Comparison between experimental data and electron-ionized impurities scattering time as a function of <it>B</it></p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Comparison between experimental data and electron-ionized impurities scattering time as a function of <it>B</it></b>. <b>(a) </b><it>I</it><sub>light </sub>as a function of the magnetic field where the background has been subtracted. <b>(b) </b>Ionized impurity scattering <inline-formula><graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i2.gif"/></inline-formula> under magnetic field between |up&#9002; and |down&#9002; levels. <b>(c) </b>Ionized impurity scattering <inline-formula><graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i3.gif"/></inline-formula> under magnetic field between |up&#9002; and levels in the cascade. <b>(d) </b>QE calculated with Equation (1).</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-3"/></fig>
<p>The oscillating behavior at high magnetic field (<it>B </it>&gt; 9T) is a result of the electronic transfer from |up&#9002; to |down&#9002;. This transfer leads to minima in the current which fit well with <inline-formula>
<graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i2.gif"/>
</inline-formula> and QE. The long period oscillating behavior of <inline-formula>
<graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i3.gif"/>
</inline-formula> as a function of <it>B </it>enhances the peak at <it>B </it>= 14 T in QE in agreement with experimental data. QE, which describes the performance of the detector, is oscillating between 74 and 85% under <it>B</it>. By extrapolating, at <it>B </it>= 0T, QE is equal to 75%, a value that should be increased to improve the detector performance. An optimized structure should take these results into account by shifting the ionized impurities from the active region, where they are enhancing <inline-formula>
<graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i2.gif"/>
</inline-formula>, to a position where they would only enhance <inline-formula>
<graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i3.gif"/>
</inline-formula>. The series of peak at <it>B </it>&lt; 9T corresponds to a characteristic energy of 37 meV. This energy is attributed to transitions in the cascade involving an elastic scattering mechanism.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>In conclusion, we observe oscillations of the photocurrent in a mid-infrared QCD as a function of <it>B</it>. These oscillations are due to electron-ionized impurities scattering. This mechanism is dominant in this structure because impurities are located in the active region. In order to improve further this efficiency, we suggest to shift the impurities in another location of the structure in order to minimize <inline-formula>
<graphic file="1556-276X-6-206-i2.gif"/>
</inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain is a " Unit&#233; Mixte de Recherche" between &#201;cole Normale Sup&#233;rieure, the CNRS, the University Paris 6 and the University Paris 7.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abbreviations</p>
</st>
<p>LLs: Landau levels; QCD: quantum cascade detector.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>FRJ, NPL and LAV performed magneto-transport experiment, analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. YG, FC and RF participated in the analysis of the data. AB, LD and VB designed the band diagram of the structure and performed analysis. MC and XM have grown the sample by molecular beam epitaxy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>This study has been supported by a grant of the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR).</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Quantum cascade photodetector</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gendron</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Carras</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Huynh</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ortiz</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Koeniguer</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>85</volume><fpage>2824</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.1781731</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>High resistance narrow band quantum cascade photodetectors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gendron</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Koeniguer</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Marcadet</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>121116</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.1884257</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Terahertz range quantum well infrared photodetector</p></title><aug><au><snm>Graf</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Scalari</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Hofstetter</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Faist</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Beere</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Linfield</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Ritchie</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Davies</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>84</volume><fpage>475</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.1641165</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>A THz quantum cascade detector in a strong perpendicular magnetic field</p></title><aug><au><snm>Scalari</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Graf</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hofstetter</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Faist</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Beere</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Linfield</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Ritchie</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Semicond Sci Technol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>1743</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1088/0268-1242/21/12/042</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>New 10 <it>&#956;</it>m Infrared detector using intersubband absorption in resonant tunneling GaAlAs superlattices</p></title><aug><au><snm>Levine</snm><fnm>BF</fnm></au><au><snm>Choi</snm><fnm>KK</fnm></au><au><snm>Bethea</snm><fnm>CG</fnm></au><au><snm>Walker</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Malik</snm><fnm>RJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>1987</pubdate><volume>50</volume><fpage>1092</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.97928</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Intersubband magnetophonon resonances in quantum cascade structures</p></title><aug><au><snm>Smirnov</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Drachenko</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Leotin</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Page</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Sirtori</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Apalkov</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Chakraborty</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>66</volume><fpage>125317</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.66.125317</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Electron scattering spectroscopy by a high magnetic field in quantum cascade lasers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Leuliet</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Vasanelli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Wade</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Fedorov</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Smirnov</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Bastard</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Sirtori</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>085311</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.73.085311</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Inter-Landau level scattering and LO-phonon emission in terahertz quantum cascade laser</p></title><aug><au><snm>P&#233;r&#233;-Laperne</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>de Vaulchier</snm><fnm>L-A</fnm></au><au><snm>Guldner</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Bastard</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Sacalari</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Giovannini</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Faist</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Vasanelli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Dhillon</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Sirtori</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>91</volume><fpage>062102</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Dark current analysis of quantum cascade detectors by ma- gnetoresistance measurements</p></title><aug><au><snm>A P&#233;r&#233;-Laperne</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>de Vaulchier</snm><fnm>L-A</fnm></au><au><snm>Koeniguer</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vasanelli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nedelcu</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Marcadet</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Guldner</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>77</volume><fpage>085307</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Electronlongitudinal optical phonon interaction between Landau levels in semiconductor heterostructures</p></title><aug><au><snm>Becker</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Vasanelli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sirtori</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Bastard</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>69</volume><fpage>115328</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.69.115328</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Evaluation of some scattering times for electrons in unbiased and biased single- and multiple- quantum-well structures</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bastard</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>1989</pubdate><volume>40</volume><fpage>1074</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.40.1074</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Photocurrent analysis of quantum cascade de- tectors by magnetotransport</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jasnot</snm><fnm>F-R</fnm></au><au><snm>P&#233;r&#233;-Laperne</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>de Vaulchier</snm><fnm>L-A</fnm></au><au><snm>Guldner</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Carosella</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Buffaz</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Doyennette</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Carras</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Berger</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>82</volume><fpage>125447</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.82.125447</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>