<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1556-276X-6-149</ui><ji>1556-276X</ji><fm>
<dochead>Nano Express</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Room temperature spin diffusion in (110) GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Hu</snm><fnm>Changcheng</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>jidayouzi@sina.com</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Ye</snm><fnm>Huiqi</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>hqye@iphy.ac.cn</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Gang</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>g_wang@iphy.ac.cn</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Tian</snm><fnm>Haitao</fnm><email>etianhaitao@gmail.com</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Wenxin</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>wxwang@iphy.ac.cn</email></au>
<au id="A6"><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>Wenquan</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>wangwq@jlu.edu.cn</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A7"><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>Baoli</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>blliu@iphy.ac.cn</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A8"><snm>Marie</snm><fnm>Xavier</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>marie@insa-toulouse.fr</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>School of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 603, Beijing 100190, PR China</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>INSA-CNRS-UPS; LPCNO, Universit&#233; de Toulouse, 135 av. de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Nanoscale Research Letters</source>
<issn>1556-276X</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>149</fpage>
<url>http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/149</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">21711662</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1556-276X-6-149</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>14</day><month>9</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>16</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>16</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>Hu et al; licensee Springer.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<p>Transient spin grating experiments are used to investigate the electron spin diffusion in intrinsic (110) GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum well at room temperature. The measured spin diffusion length of optically excited electrons is about 4 &#956;m at low spin density. Increasing the carrier density yields both a decrease of the spin relaxation time and the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s</sub>.</p>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><meta>
<classifications>
<classification id="ICSNN_2010" subtype="theme_series_title" type="BMC">International Conference on Superlattices, Nanostructures and Nanodevices (ICSNN 2010)</classification>
<classification id="ICSNN_2010" subtype="theme_series_editor" type="BMC"/>
</classifications>
</meta><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Introduction</p>
</st>
<p>The interest in the spin properties of carriers in semiconductors has increased dramatically in the past 10 years due to potential application in the field of spintronics <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The design of practical spintronic devices usually requires efficient spin injection in the semiconductor, long carrier spin lifetimes, and long spin transport/diffusion lengths <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>One of the key parameters describing the properties of carrier spin transport in semiconductors is the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s</sub>, which is often assumed to be the same as charge diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>c </sub>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A direct optical measurement of the electron spin diffusion coefficient can be performed by creating electron spin grating in time-resolved four-wave mixing experiments <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This powerful transient spin grating (TSG) technique was used recently to study the spin transport properties and determine the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In particular it was demonstrated theoretically and experimentally that the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>in <it>n</it>-doped (100)-grown GaAs quantum wells can be smaller than the charge diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>c </sub>due to Coulomb interaction among the electrons (the so-called Spin Coulomb Drag effect) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In these (100)-grown GaAs quantum wells, the electron spin lifetime is of the order of 100 ps at room temperature (RT) due to very efficient D'yakonov-Perel (DP) spin relaxation mechanism <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In the classical two-component drift-diffusion model <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, the spin diffusion length <it>L</it>
<sub>s </sub>is determined by the spin lifetime <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1"><m:mrow>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
      <m:mo>*</m:mo>
   </m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> and the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>through <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i2"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>L</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msqrt>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>D</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
         </m:msub>
         <m:msubsup>
            <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
            <m:mo>*</m:mo>
         </m:msubsup>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:msqrt>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula>. As a consequence, the spin diffusion length <it>L</it>
<sub>s </sub>at RT is smaller than 1 &#956;m, limited by the short spin lifetime <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In (110)-grown GaAs/AlGaAs QW, the DP spin relaxation mechanism is not efficient for electron spins parallel to the growth direction because the spin orientation of electrons is parallel to the direction of effective magnetic field induced by spin-orbit coupling <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Spin relaxation times longer than 1 ns at RT in (110) GaAs QW have indeed been measured <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Long electron spin diffusion lengths can thus be expected at high temperature in these structures. In this report, the electron spin diffusion is measured by the TSG technique with heterodyne detection in (110) GaAs/AlGaAs QWs at RT. We find that the spin diffusion length <it>L</it>
<sub>s </sub>is about 4 &#956;m at low carrier density. We also demonstrate that the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>decreases when the carrier density increases.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Experimental procedure</p>
</st>
<p>The investigated sample was grown on (110)-oriented semi-insulating GaAs substrate by molecular beam epitaxy. It consists of 20 planes of 8 nm thick GaAs QW with symmetric 27 nm Al<sub>0.28</sub>Ga<sub>0.72</sub>As barriers on both sides. The sample is nominally undoped. All the measurements are performed at RT. In the spin grating experiment, the laser pulses are generated by a mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser with 120 fs pulse duration and 76 MHz repetition frequency and split into primary pump and probe beams. The center wavelength is set to 830 nm to get the maximum signal of Kerr rotation through the standard time-resolved Kerr rotation technique <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Both pump and probe beams are focused on a phase mask with a period <it>d</it>. The phase mask splits each of the primary beams by diffraction into the <it>m </it>= &#177; 1 orders. The geometry of the spin grating experiment in the so-called box geometry is schematically presented in Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. For orthogonal-linearly polarized pumps, the net polarization alternates between right and left circular polarization across the excitation spot while the total intensity of the incident light is uniform <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The period &#923; of the TSG is simply: <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i3"><m:mrow>
   <m:mi mathvariant="normal">&#923;</m:mi>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mi>d</m:mi>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:mfrac>
   <m:mo>&#8901;</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>f</m:mi>
            <m:mn>2</m:mn>
         </m:msub>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>f</m:mi>
            <m:mn>1</m:mn>
         </m:msub>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:mfrac>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula>, where <it>f</it>
<sub>1 </sub>and <it>f</it>
<sub>2 </sub>are the focal lengths of two spherical mirrors. In our setup, the focal length of the first spherical mirror is fixed at <it>f</it>
<sub>1 </sub>= 30.4 cm. The focal length <it>f</it>
<sub>2 </sub>of the second spherical mirror can be changed to get a fine tuning of the period &#923;. The spot sizes of both pump and probe beams are around 90 &#956;m.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Schematic drawing of TSG setup and TSG signals</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Schematic drawing of TSG setup and TSG signals</b>. (a) <it>k</it><sub>A </sub>and <it>k</it><sub>B </sub>represent both the pump beams, <it>k</it><sub>P </sub>is the probe beam, and <it>k</it><sub>R </sub>is the reference beam. <b>(b) </b>TSG signal as a function of delay time at room temperature for two excitation powers: 2 and 18 mW.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-149-1"/></fig>
<p>According to the optical interband selection rules, this interference pattern will generate a periodical spin density in the sample. The delayed probe beam, diffracted from the grating, is monitored as a function of the delay time between the pump and the probe. In order to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, a reference beam is incident on the sample and its reflected beam is automatically collinear with the refracted probe beam. In this configuration, the spin grating signal (i.e., proportional to the electric field of the diffracted probe beam) is simply given by:</p>
<p>
<display-formula id="M1">
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i4"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>I</m:mi>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mtext>SG</m:mtext>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mi>A</m:mi>
   <m:mi>exp</m:mi>
   <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo>
   <m:mo>&#8722;</m:mo>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi mathvariant="normal">&#915;</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mi>&#916;</m:mi>
   <m:mi>t</m:mi>
   <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</display-formula>
</p>
<p>where <it>A </it>is a constant, &#915;<sub>s </sub>is the decay rate of the spin grating, and &#916;<it>t </it>is the delay time between pump and probe beams.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results and discussion</p>
</st>
<p>Figure <figr fid="F1">1b</figr> presents the signal of TSGs as a function of the time delay for two typical pump powers, 2 and 18 mW, respectively. The wave vector <it>q </it>of the spin grating is equal to <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i5"><m:mrow>
   <m:mi>q</m:mi>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mn>2</m:mn>
         <m:mi>&#960;</m:mi>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mi mathvariant="normal">&#923;</m:mi>
   </m:mfrac>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mtext>2</m:mtext>
   <m:mo>.</m:mo>
   <m:mtext>51</m:mtext>
   <m:mo>&#215;</m:mo>
   <m:msup>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mtext>10</m:mtext>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mtext>4</m:mtext>
   </m:msup>
   <m:mtext>&#8201;</m:mtext>
   <m:msup>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mtext>cm</m:mtext>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mo>&#8722;</m:mo>
         <m:mtext>1</m:mtext>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:msup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula>. It is clear that both curves exhibit different mono-exponential decays. Using equation (1), we find &#915;<sub>s </sub>= 0.063 and 0.044 ps<sup>-1 </sup>for the pump powers 2 and 18 mW, respectively.</p>
<p>In the diffusion regime, the SG decay rate writes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>:</p>
<p>
<display-formula id="M2">
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i6"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi mathvariant="normal">&#915;</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>D</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:msup>
      <m:mi>q</m:mi>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:msup>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mn>1</m:mn>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msubsup>
            <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
            <m:mo>*</m:mo>
         </m:msubsup>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:mfrac>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</display-formula>
</p>
<p>where <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>is the spin diffusion coefficient, <it>q </it>is the spin grating wave vector, and <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1">
<m:mrow>
<m:msubsup>
<m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
<m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
<m:mo>*</m:mo>
</m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> is the spin lifetime which includes the effect of both the electron spin relaxation time &#964;<sub>s </sub>and the recombination time &#964;<sub>r, </sub>as expressed by <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i7"><m:mrow>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mn>1</m:mn>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msubsup>
            <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
            <m:mo>*</m:mo>
         </m:msubsup>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:mfrac>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mn>1</m:mn>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
         </m:msub>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:mfrac>
   <m:mo>+</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mn>1</m:mn>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>r</m:mtext>
         </m:msub>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:mfrac>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula>. To separate the effects of spin diffusion and spin relaxation, the grating decay rate is measured as a function of the grating wave vector <it>q </it>by changing the phase mask with different periods (<it>d </it>= 5, 6, 7, and 8 &#956;m) and/or the second spherical mirror with different focus lengths (<it>f</it>
<sub>2 </sub>= 15.2 and 30.4 cm). Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr> shows the grating decay rate as a function of <it>q</it>
<sup>2 </sup>for two excitation powers. Each set of data points can be fitted linearly, yielding the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s</sub>. At low excitation power of 2 mW, which corresponds to an optical intensity of 30W/cm<sup>2</sup>, we find <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>= ~102 cm<sup>2</sup>/s. This value is in good agreement with the values obtained by other groups in (110)-grown GaAs/AlGaAs QWs at RT <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. It is also very close to the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>measured in (100)-grown GaAs/AlGaAs QWs at RT <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This result suggests that the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>does not depend critically on the spin-orbit coupling, which depends on the crystalline direction of the sample. Nevertheless, as shown in Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>, it is very sensitive to the carrier density.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Spin diffusion coefficient and spin dynamics for two different powers</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Spin diffusion coefficient and spin dynamics for two different powers</b>. <b>(a) </b>Decay rate of spin grating as a function of <it>q</it><sup>2 </sup>for two excitation powers: 2 and 18mW. <b>(b) </b>Kerr rotation dynamics obtained from homogenous spin excitation.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-149-2"/></fig>
<p>In order to obtain the spin diffusion length <it>L</it>
<sub>s</sub>, the spin lifetime <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1">
<m:mrow>
<m:msubsup>
<m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
<m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
<m:mo>*</m:mo>
</m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> is measured independently by time-resolved Kerr rotation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The excitation powers are the same as the ones used in the measurement of TSG. Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr> presents the Kerr rotation dynamics for two excitation powers. The spin lifetimes <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1">
<m:mrow>
<m:msubsup>
<m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
<m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
<m:mo>*</m:mo>
</m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> are extracted by mono-exponential fits, which yield <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1">
<m:mrow>
<m:msubsup>
<m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
<m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
<m:mo>*</m:mo>
</m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> ~1220 ps and <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1">
<m:mrow>
<m:msubsup>
<m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
<m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
<m:mo>*</m:mo>
</m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> ~880 ps with excitation powers of 2 and 18 mW, respectively. As expected for (110)-grown QWs, the spin lifetimes for both excitation powers are much longer than the ones (<inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i1">
<m:mrow>
<m:msubsup>
<m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
<m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
<m:mo>*</m:mo>
</m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula> ~ 50-100 ps) measured in (100)-grown GaAs/AlGaAs QWs at RT <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. By combining the <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>measurement obtained with the spin grating technique and the electron spin lifetime probed by the Kerr rotation experiment, we find that the spin diffusion length decreases from <it>L</it>
<sub>s </sub>~ 3.5 &#956;m down to 2.2 &#956;m when the excitation power increases from 2 to 18 mW. To the best of our knowledge, these values are the longest electron spin diffusion lengths reported at room temperature in inorganic semiconductors.</p>
<p>In order to get further insights on this power dependence, we also measured the charge diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>c </sub>with a concentration grating technique for different pump powers. We find that <it>D</it>
<sub>c </sub>remains constant with a typical value <it>D</it>
<sub>c </sub>~ 12.5 cm<sup>2</sup>/s (data not shown here). This value is in good agreement with previous studies performed in non-intentionally doped (100)-grown GaAs QWs which demonstrate that the concentration grating experiments are governed by the hole diffusion <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Our spin diffusion coefficient results obtained at RT on (110) QWs contrast with the previous measurements of the carrier density dependence of the spin diffusion obtained at low temperature in <it>n</it>-doped bulk GaAs or (100) quantum wells <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In <it>n</it>-doped QWs, Carter et al. observed that <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>
<it>increases </it>by increasing the density of the optically excited carriers. This increase of the electron spin diffusion coefficient was interpreted in terms of heating of the excess electrons due to relaxation of energetic optically excited carriers. Remarkably, in non-intentionally doped GaAs (110)-grown QWs, we observe at room temperature the opposite behavior. As displayed in Figure <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>, the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>
<it>decreases </it>abruptly for a pump power varying between 2 and 10 mW, and then remains almost coefficient up to 40 mW. In the same power range the spin lifetime (Figure <figr fid="F3">3b</figr>) has a different power dependence: it decreases monotonously as already observed by different groups, due to electron spin relaxation enhancement by the electron-hole exchange interaction <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Since the sample was undoped, we can equate the electron spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>to the electron charge diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>e</sub>. The spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>can thus be written <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>:</p>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Power-dependence spin diffusion coefficient and spin lifetime</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Power-dependence spin diffusion coefficient and spin lifetime</b>. <b>(a) </b>Spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it><sub>s </sub>versus pump power, i.e., spin density; the blue line is a simple fit according to <inline-formula><m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i8"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>p</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>&#8733;</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mtext>ex</m:mtext>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mo>&#8722;</m:mo>
         <m:mn>0.5</m:mn>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math></inline-formula>. <b>(b) </b>Pump power-dependent spin lifetime through Kerr rotation measurement with a fixed probe power of 0.2 mW.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-149-3"/></fig>
<p>
<display-formula id="M3">
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i9"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>D</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>s</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>D</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>e</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:mfrac>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mo> &lt;</m:mo>
         <m:msup>
            <m:mi>v</m:mi>
            <m:mn>2</m:mn>
         </m:msup>
         <m:mo>&gt;</m:mo>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>p</m:mtext>
         </m:msub>
      </m:mrow>
      <m:mn>2</m:mn>
   </m:mfrac>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</display-formula>
</p>
<p>where &lt;<it>v</it>
<sup>2</sup>&gt; is the mean square velocity of electrons and &#964;<sub>p </sub>is the momentum relaxation time. In a very simple approach, &lt;<it>v</it>
<sup>2</sup>&gt; in a QW can be approximated by <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i10"><m:mrow>
   <m:mo> &lt;</m:mo>
   <m:msup>
      <m:mi>v</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>2</m:mtext>
   </m:msup>
   <m:mo>&gt;</m:mo>
   <m:mo>=</m:mo>
   <m:msqrt>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mn>2</m:mn>
         <m:msub>
            <m:mi>k</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>B</m:mtext>
         </m:msub>
         <m:mi>T</m:mi>
         <m:mo>/</m:mo>
         <m:msubsup>
            <m:mi>m</m:mi>
            <m:mtext>e</m:mtext>
            <m:mo>*</m:mo>
         </m:msubsup>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:msqrt>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula>. The momentum relaxation &#964;<sub>p </sub>is strongly dependent on the density of photogenerated electrons <it>n</it>
<sub>e</sub>, with a typical power law <inline-formula>
<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" name="1556-276X-6-149-i11"><m:mrow>
   <m:msub>
      <m:mi>&#964;</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>p</m:mtext>
   </m:msub>
   <m:mo>&#8733;</m:mo>
   <m:msubsup>
      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
      <m:mtext>e</m:mtext>
      <m:mrow>
         <m:mo>&#8722;</m:mo>
         <m:mn>0.5</m:mn>
      </m:mrow>
   </m:msubsup>
</m:mrow>
</m:math>
</inline-formula>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In the low density regime below 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>10 </sup>cm<sup>-2</sup>, which corresponds to a pump power of 10 mW, the experimental data are well fitted by this power law as shown by the blue line in Figure <figr fid="F3">3a</figr>. In the high density regime above 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>10 </sup>cm<sup>-2</sup>, the spin diffusion coefficient is almost constant and the density dependence can no more be interpreted by the simple power law. In this density range, the above discussion is clearly oversimplified and we hope that these experimental results will stimulate theoretical investigations to elucidate the origin of the carrier density dependence of the spin diffusion coefficient.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>We have measured optically the spin diffusion coefficient <it>D</it>
<sub>s </sub>in non-intentionally doped GaAs/AlGaAs (110) QWs at room temperature for different excitation powers. Under low excitation, the electron spin diffusion length <it>L</it>
<sub>s </sub>is around 4 &#956;m; to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest reported value at <it>T </it>= 300 K in III-V semiconductors. We also show that the spin diffusion coefficient of optically excited electrons decreases when the excitation density increases. These results could be useful to understand the spin transport properties in semiconductor structures, and possibly control/manipulate the spin transport by varying the excitation condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abbreviations</p>
</st>
<p>DP: D'yakonov-Perel; TSG: transient spin grating.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>CC, BL conceived and designed the experiments. CC, HQ carried out the experiments with contribution from GW and WQW. WXW and HT provided the samples. BL and XM supervised the work. CC, BL and XM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Open Access</p>
</st>
<p>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>We thank Ming-Wei WU for useful discussions. We acknowledge the financial support of this study from National Science Foundation of China, Grant number: 10534030, 10774183, 10911130356, 10874212; also supported by Ministry of Finance and Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Basic Research Program of China (2006CB921300, 2009CB930500), the ANR project SpinMan.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Spintronics: fundamentals and applications</p></title><aug><au><snm>&#381;uti&#263;</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Fabian</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Das Sama</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Rev Mod Phys</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>76</volume><fpage>323</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Electronic analog of the electro-optic modulator</p></title><aug><au><snm>Datta</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Das</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>665</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.102730</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Room-temperature spin memory in two-dimensional electron gases</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kikkawa</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Smorchkova</snm><fnm>IP</fnm></au><au><snm>Samarth</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Awschalom</snm><fnm>DD</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>277</volume><fpage>1284</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.277.5330.1284</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Long-distance diffusion of excitons in double quantum well structures</p></title><aug><au><snm>V&#246;r&#246;s</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Balili</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Snoke</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au><au><snm>Pfeiffer</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>West</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>94</volume><fpage>226401</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16090415</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Spin transport in GaAs</p></title><aug><au><snm>H&#228;gele</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Oestreich</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>R&#252;hle</snm><fnm>WW</fnm></au><au><snm>Nestle</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Eberl</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>1580</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Optical and electrical spin injection in spin-LEDs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au><au><snm>Senes</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Couderc</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Bobo</snm><fnm>JF</fnm></au><au><snm>Marie</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Amanda</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Fontaine</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Arnoult</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Physica E</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>358</fpage><note>Zhu HJ, Ramsteiner M, Kostial H, Wassermeier M, Sch&#246;nherr H-P, Ploog KH: Room-temperature spin injection from Fe into GaAs. <it>Phys Rev Lett </it>2001, <b>87</b>:016601</note><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00809-3</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Anisotropic spin transport in (110) GaAs quantum wells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Couto</snm><fnm>ODD</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au><au><snm>Iikawa</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Rudolph</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hey</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Santos</snm><fnm>PV</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>98</volume><fpage>036603</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.036603</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17358707</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>All-optical measurement of Rashba coefficient in quantum wells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Eldridge</snm><fnm>PS</fnm></au><au><snm>Leyland</snm><fnm>WJH</fnm></au><au><snm>Lagoudakis</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Karimov</snm><fnm>OZ</fnm></au><au><snm>Henini</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Phillips</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au><au><snm>Harley</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>77</volume><fpage>125344</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.77.125344</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Spin gratings and the measurement of electron drift mobility in multiple quantum well semiconductors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cameron</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Riblet</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Miller</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>76</volume><fpage>4793</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4793</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10061382</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Observation of spin Coulomb drag in a two-dimensional electron gas</p></title><aug><au><snm>Weber</snm><fnm>CP</fnm></au><au><snm>Gedik</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Orenstein</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Stephens</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Awschalom</snm><fnm>DD</fnm></au></aug><source>Nature</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>437</volume><fpage>1330</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nature04206</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16251958</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Optical measurement and control of spin diffusion in n-doped GaAs quantum wells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Carter</snm><fnm>SG</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Cundiff</snm><fnm>ST</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>97</volume><fpage>136602</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.136602</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17026058</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Theory of spin Coulomb drag in spin-polarized transport</p></title><aug><au><snm>D'Amico</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Vignale</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>62</volume><fpage>4853</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors</p></title><aug><au><snm>D'yakonov</snm><fnm>MI</fnm></au><au><snm>Perel</snm><fnm>VI</fnm></au></aug><source>Sov Phys Solid State</source><pubdate>1972</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>3023</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Spin diffusion in Si/SiGe quantum wells: Spin relaxation in the absence of D'yakonov-Perel' relaxation mechanism</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>MW</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>79</volume><fpage>075303</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.79.075303</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Spin relaxation of two-dimensional electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors</p></title><aug><au><snm>D'Yakonov</snm><fnm>MI</fnm></au><au><snm>Kachorovskii</snm><fnm>VYu</fnm></au></aug><source>Sov Phys Semicond</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>110</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Optical spin orientation in (110) GaAs quantum wells at room temperature</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lombez</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Lagarde</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Renucci</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Amand</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Marie</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>WX</fnm></au><au><snm>Xue</snm><fnm>QK</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Status Solidic</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>475</fpage><note>Ohno Y, Terauchi R, Adachi T, Matsukura F, Ohno H: Spin relaxation in GaAs(110) quantum wells. <it>Phys Rev Lett </it>1999, <b>83</b>:4196; D&#246;hrmann S, H&#228;gele D, Rudolph J, Bichler M, Schuh D, Oestreich M: Anomalous spin dephasing in (110) GaAs quantum wells: Anisotropy and intersubband effects. <it>Phys Rev Lett </it>2004, <b>93</b>:147405</note><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/pssc.200673296</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Electron density dependence of in-plane spin relaxation anisotropy in GaAs/AlGaAs two-dimensional electron gas</p></title><aug><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au><au><snm>Zhao</snm><fnm>HM</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>WX</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>90</volume><fpage>112111</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.2713353</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Development of the transient spin grating system and its application in the study of spin transport</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hu</snm><fnm>CC</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Ye</snm><fnm>HQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au></aug><source>Acta Phys Sin</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>59</volume><fpage>597</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Optical heterodyne detection of laser-induced gratings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maznev</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>Nelson</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rogers</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au></aug><source>Opt Lett</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>1319</fpage><note>Gedik N, Orenstein J: Absolute phase measurement in heterodyne detection of transient gratings. <it>Opt Lett </it>2004, <b>29</b>:2109</note><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1364/OL.23.001319</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">18087511</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Absence of the Rashba effect in undoped asymmetric quantum wells</p></title><aug><au><snm>Eldridge</snm><fnm>PS</fnm></au><au><snm>Leyland</snm><fnm>WJH</fnm></au><au><snm>Mar</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Lagoudakis</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Winkler</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Karimov</snm><fnm>OZ</fnm></au><au><snm>Henini</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Taylor</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Phillips</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au><au><snm>Harley</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>82</volume><fpage>045317</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.82.045317</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Lateral spin diffusion probed by two-color Hanle-MOKE technique</p></title><aug><au><snm>Quast</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au><au><snm>Astakhov</snm><fnm>GV</fnm></au><au><snm>Ossau</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Molenkamp</snm><fnm>LW</fnm></au><au><snm>Heinrich</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>H&#246;fling</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Forchel</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Acta Physica Polonica A</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>114</volume><fpage>1311</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Spin relaxation in n-type GaAs quantum wells with transient spin grating</p></title><aug><au><snm>Weng</snm><fnm>MQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>MW</fnm></au><au><snm>Cui</snm><fnm>HL</fnm></au></aug><source>J Appl Phys</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>103</volume><fpage>063714</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.2899962</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Two-dimensional carrier-carrier screening in a quantum-well</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bigot</snm><fnm>JY</fnm></au><au><snm>Portella</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Schoenlein</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au><au><snm>Cunningham</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Shank</snm><fnm>CV</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>67</volume><fpage>636</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.636</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10044949</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>