<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1556-276X-6-146</ui><ji>1556-276X</ji><fm>
<dochead>Nano Review</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Electronic and magnetic properties of SnO<sub>2</sub>/CrO<sub>2 </sub>thin superlattices</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Borges</snm><mi>D</mi><fnm>Pablo</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>pdborges@gmail.com</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Scolfaro</snm><mi>MR</mi><fnm>Lu&#237;sa</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>lscolfaro@txstate.edu</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Leite Alves</snm><mi>W</mi><fnm>Hor&#225;cio</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>hwlalves@ufsj.edu.br</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>da Silva</snm><mi>F</mi><fnm>Eronides</fnm><suf>Jr</suf><insr iid="I4"/><email>eron@ufpe.br</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Assali</snm><mi>VC</mi><fnm>Lucy</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>lassali@if.usp.br</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Instituto de F&#237;sica, Universidade de S&#227;o Paulo, CP 66318, S&#227;o Paulo, SP, 05315-970, Brazil</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Department of Physics, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>Universidade Federal de S&#227;o Jo&#227;o Del Rei, CP 110, S&#227;o Joao Del Rei, MG, 36301-160, Brazil</p></ins>
<ins id="I4"><p>Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Nanoscale Research Letters</source>
<issn>1556-276X</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>146</fpage>
<url>http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/146</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">21711669</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1556-276X-6-146</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>25</day><month>8</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>15</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>15</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>Borges et al; licensee Springer.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<p>In this article, using first-principles electronic structure calculations within the spin density functional theory, alternated magnetic and non-magnetic layers of rutile-CrO<sub>2 </sub>and rutile-SnO<sub>2 </sub>respectively, in a (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>superlattice (SL) configuration, with <it>n </it>being the number of monolayers which are considered equal to 1, 2, ..., 10 are studied. A half-metallic behavior is observed for the (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs for all values of <it>n</it>. The ground state is found to be FM with a magnetic moment of 2 &#956;<sub>B </sub>per chromium atom, and this result does not depend on the number of monolayers <it>n</it>. As the FM rutile-CrO<sub>2 </sub>is unstable at ambient temperature, and known to be stabilized when on top of SnO<sub>2</sub>, the authors suggest that (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs may be applied to spintronic technologies since they provide efficient spin-polarized carriers.</p>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><meta>
<classifications>
<classification id="ICSNN_2010" subtype="theme_series_title" type="BMC">International Conference on Superlattices, Nanostructures and Nanodevices (ICSNN 2010)</classification>
<classification id="ICSNN_2010" subtype="theme_series_editor" type="BMC"/>
</classifications>
</meta><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Introduction</p>
</st>
<p>A variety of heterostructures have been studied for spintronics applications, and they have proved to have a great potential for high-performance spin-based electronics <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A key requirement in developing most devices based on spins is that the host material must be ferromagnetic (FM) above 300 K. In addition, it is necessary to have efficient spin-polarized carriers. One approach to achieve the spin injection is to create built-up superlattices (SLs) of alternating magnetic and non-magnetic materials. One attempt has already been made by Zaoui et al. <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, through <it>ab initio </it>electronic structure calculations for the one monolayer (ZnO)<sub>1</sub>(CuO)<sub>1 </sub>SL, with the aim of obtaining a half-metallic behavior material, since they are 100% spin polarized at the Fermi level and therefore appear ideal for a well-defined carrier spin injection.</p>
<p>In this study, the magnetic and electronic properties of (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs with <it>n </it>= 1, 2, ..., 10 being the number of monolayers are investigated. These systems are good candidates to obtain a half-metallic behavior material since bulk rutile-CrO<sub>2 </sub>has shown experimentally this behavior <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and recently magnetic tunnel junctions based on CrO<sub>2</sub>/SnO<sub>2 </sub>epitaxial layers have been obtained <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Theoretical method</p>
</st>
<p>All the calculations were based on the spin density functional theory. The Projector-Augmented Wave method implemented in the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP-PAW) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp> was employed in this study, and for the exchange-correlation potential, the generalized gradient approximation and the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (GGA-PBE) approach was used <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The valence electronic distribution for the PAWs representing the atoms were Sn-- 4<it>d</it>
<sup>10 </sup>5<it>s</it>
<sup>2 </sup>5<it>p</it>
<sup>2</sup>, Cr-- 3<it>d</it>
<sup>5 </sup>5<it>s</it>
<sup>1</sup>, and O-2<it>s</it>
<sup>2 </sup>2p<sup>4</sup>. Scalar relativistic effects were included. For simulation of the one monolayer (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1 </sub>SL, a supercell with 12 atoms (2Sn, 2Cr, and 8O) in the rutile structure as shown in Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr> was used. For this case, a 4 &#215; 4 &#215; 3 mesh of Monkhorst-Pack <it>k</it>-points was used for integration in the SL BZ. All the calculations were done with a 490 eV energy cutoff in the plane-wave expansions.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>The supercell model and total energies for the systems</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>The supercell model and total energies for the systems. </b><b>(a)</b> Supercell used to study the (SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub> SL, and <b>(b)</b> Total energies for the non-magnetic (NM) and anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) states relative to the ferromagnetic (FM) state. The dashed lines connecting the points are to guide the eyes.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-146-1"/></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results and discussion</p>
</st>
<p>For the (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1 </sub>SL, the calculation was started with the experimental lattice parameters of the tin dioxide, <it>a </it>= 4.737 &#197;, <it>c/a = </it>0.673, and <it>u </it>= 0.307 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. The system was relaxed until the residual forces on the ions were less than 10 meV/&#197;. Good agreement between the calculated and the available experimental values for the lattice parameters is obtained, as seen in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. Figure <figr fid="F1">1b</figr> shows that the ground state is ferromagnetic (FM), being the most stable state compared with the non-magnetic (NM) and anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) ones. For the ground state, the total magnetic moment gives a value of 2 &#956;<sub>B </sub>per chromium atom. Figure <figr fid="F2">2a,b</figr> presents the total density of states (TDOS) and the projected density of states (PDOS), respectively for the Cr 3d orbital, showing that the system has a half metallic behavior, with the Cr 3d orbital appearing in the gap region, characterizing a metallic-like behavior for the majority spin and a semiconductor-like behavior for the minority spin. The band structures of the SL for spin up and spin down are depicted in Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>. A band gap of approximately 1.71 eV is obtained for the minority spin at the &#1043;-point. There is a smaller gap for spin flip excitations from the Fermi level, which is approximately 0.86 eV. For the (SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs with <it>n </it>&gt;1, considered here up to <it>n </it>= 10, it was observed that the ground state remains as FM. The interplay of the SnO<sub>2 </sub>and CrO<sub>2 </sub>layer thicknesses does not change the half-metallic behavior, as can be verified through the DOS shown in Figure <figr fid="F3">3a,b</figr> for <it>n </it>= 10. The magnetic moment per Cr atom, in all the studied cases, is the same and equal to 2 &#956;<sub>B</sub>. Moreover, the SL magnetization does not depend on the number of monolayers. This has been verified by performing calculations with one monolayer of CrO<sub>2 </sub>grown between 3, 7, and 11 monolayers of SnO<sub>2</sub>. It was observed that the SL magnetization remained equal to 2 &#956;<sub>B</sub>. Our results show a 100% spin polarization at the Fermi level, ideal for a well-defined carrier spin injection.</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Experimental and calculated values for the lattice parameters of the SnO<sub>2</sub>, CrO<sub>2</sub>, and of the (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1 </sub>and (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>10 </sub>SLs in the rutile structure</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b><it>a </it>(&#197;)</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>c/a</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>u</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>SnO<sub>2</sub></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4.737<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.673<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.307<sup>a</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4.839<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.670<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.306<sup>b</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>CrO<sub>2</sub></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4.421<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.6596<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.301<sup>c</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4.455<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.6569<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.304<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>(CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4.625<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>0.658<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <sup>-</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>(CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>10</sub></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>4.640<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>6.546<sup>d</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <sup>-</sup>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p><sup>a</sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>; <sup>b</sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>; <sup>c</sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>; <sup>d</sup>this work</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Density of states and band structure for the (SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub> SL.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Density of states and band structure for the (SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub>(CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>1</sub> SL</b>. <b>(a)</b> Total density of states (TDOS), <b>(b)</b> Project density of states (PDOS) for the Cr-d orbital, <b>(c)</b> Band structure, for spin up and spin down, along the main symmetry lines of the SL BZ. The Fermi level, E<sub>F</sub>, is set to zero in (a), (b), and (c).</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-146-2"/></fig>
<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Density of states and total energies for the SL with n=10.</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Density of states and total energies for the SL with n=10. (a) </b>Total density of states (in black) and project density of states (in gray) for the Cr--3d. <b>(b) </b>Total energies for the non magnetic (NM) and anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) states relative to the ferromagnetic (FM) state. The Fermi level, E<sub>F</sub>, is set to zero. The dashed lines connecting the points are to guide the eyes.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-146-3"/></fig>
<p>An investigation, related to strain effects along the <it>z</it>-direction for the rutile phase of CrO<sub>2</sub>, was made by simulating bulk rutile-CrO<sub>2</sub>, on top of tin dioxide, assuming for CrO<sub>2 </sub>the lattice parameter <it>a </it>of SnO<sub>2</sub>, i.e., a situation in which the chromium dioxide is tensile. By varying the ratio <it>c/a</it>
<sub>SnO2 </sub>and minimizing the total energy of the system, the authors obtained the curves shown in Figure <figr fid="F4">4a</figr> for the FM, AFM, and NM states, showing that the transition from a FM to an AFM state occurs when <it>c/a</it>
<sub>SnO2 </sub>is about 0.544. At this value, a magnetic moment reduction is observed, as depicted in Figure <figr fid="F4">4b</figr>. These results suggest a magnetization change when the SL is under strain or, in other words, when CrO<sub>2 </sub>is compressed. A similar behavior was found by Srivastava et al. for bulk rutile-CrO<sub>2 </sub>under pressure <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Study of strain effects on the magnetic behavior</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Study of strain effects on the magnetic behavior. (a)</b> Total energy versus the <b><it>c/a</it></b><sub>SnO2</sub> parameter for bulk rutile-CrO<sub>2</sub> for AFM, FM, and NM states. <b>(b) </b>Magnetic moment per cell versus the c/a<sub>SnO2</sub> parameter.</p>
</text><graphic file="1556-276X-6-146-4"/></fig>
<p>The advantage in using the SnO<sub>2</sub>/CrO<sub>2 </sub>SLs, despite the fact that CrO<sub>2 </sub>is unstable at room temperature, is that its stability becomes possible when grown on SnO<sub>2 </sub>
<abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Our results showed that the interface effects due to the lattice mismatch do not change the chromium dioxide magnetism characteristics. If the distances between two planes perpendicular to the rutile <it>c</it>-axis containing the Cr<sub>2 </sub>and Sn<sub>1 </sub>are compared (see Figure <figr fid="F1">1a</figr>), at the interface region of the SL, before and after full relaxations, then changes of only approximately 4% are observed for all the studied SLs.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusions</p>
</st>
<p>In conclusion, the results of first-principles electronic structure calculations, within the spin density functional theory, carried out for (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs formed by alternating magnetic and non-magnetic layers of rutile-CrO<sub>2 </sub>and rutile-SnO<sub>2</sub>, where the number of monolayers <it>n </it>was varied from 1 to 10, have been reported in this article. A half-metallic behavior is observed for all the studied (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs. The ground state is FM, with a magnetic moment of 2 &#956;<sub>B </sub>per chromium atom, which is independent of the number of monolayers. As the FM rutile-CrO<sub>2 </sub>is unstable at ambient temperature, and known to be stabilized when on top of SnO<sub>2</sub>, it is suggested that (CrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n</it>
</sub>(SnO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>
<it>n </it>
</sub>SLs may be applied to spintronic technologies since they provide efficient spin-polarized carriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abbreviations</p>
</st>
<p>AFM: anti-ferromagnetic; FM: ferromagnetic; GGA-PBE: generalized gradient approximation and the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof; NM: non-magnetic; PDOS: projected density of states; SL: superlattice; TDOS: total density of states; VASP-PAW: Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package and the Projected Augmented Wave.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>PB performed the ab initio calculations, participated in the analysis, and drafted the manuscript. LS and PB conceived of the study. HA, ES, LA, and LS participated in the analysis and in the production of a final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>The authors would like to thank the partial support from the Brazilian funding agencies FAPEMIG, FAPESP, CAPES, and CNPq, and from the Material, Science, Engineering and Commercialization Program at the Texas State University in San Marcos.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wolf</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Awschalom</snm><fnm>DD</fnm></au><au><snm>Buhrman</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Daughton</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>von Moln&#225;r</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Roukes</snm><fnm>ML</fnm></au><au><snm>Chtchelkanova</snm><fnm>AY</fnm></au><au><snm>Treger</snm><fnm>DM</fnm></au></aug><source>Science</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>294</volume><fpage>1488</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.1065389</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11711666</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Magnetic properties of (ZnO)1/(CuO)1 (001) superlattice</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zaoui</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferhat</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ahuja</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>94</volume><fpage>102102</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.3095811</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Near-complete spin polarization in atomically-smooth chromium-dioxide epitaxial films prepared using a CVD liquid precursor</p></title><aug><au><snm>Anguelouch</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Gupta</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Xiao</snm><fnm>Gang</fnm></au><au><snm>Abraham</snm><fnm>DW</fnm></au><au><snm>Ji</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Ingvarsson</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Chien</snm><fnm>CL</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>64</volume><fpage>180408R</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.64.180408</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Magnetic tunnel junctions based on CrO2/SnO2 epitaxial bilayers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Miao</snm><fnm>GX</fnm></au><au><snm>LeClair</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Gupta</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Xiao</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Varela</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Pennycook</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Appl Phys Lett</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>89</volume><fpage>022511</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1063/1.2216109</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kresse</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Furthmuller</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Comput Mater Sci</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>6</volume><fpage>15</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kresse</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Furthmuller</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>54</volume><fpage>11169</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple</p></title><aug><au><snm>Perdew</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Burke</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Ernzerhof</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev Lett</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>77</volume><fpage>3865</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10062328</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><aug><au><snm>Wycokoff</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Crystal Structures</source><publisher>New York, London: John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher><edition>2</edition><pubdate>1963</pubdate><volume>1</volume></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>DFT study of the electronic, vibrational, and optical properties of SnO2</p></title><aug><au><snm>Borges</snm><fnm>PD</fnm></au><au><snm>Scolfaro</snm><fnm>LMR</fnm></au><au><snm>Leite Alves</snm><fnm>HW</fnm></au><au><snm>da Silva</snm><fnm>EF</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au></aug><source>Theor Chem Acc</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>126</volume><fpage>39</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00214-009-0672-3</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>High-pressure structure of half-metallic CrO2</p></title><aug><au><snm>Maddox</snm><fnm>BR</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoo</snm><fnm>CS</fnm></au><au><snm>Kasinathan</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Pickett</snm><fnm>WE</fnm></au><au><snm>Scalettar</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au></aug><source>Phys Rev B</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>73</volume><fpage>144111</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1103/PhysRevB.73.144111</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>First Principles study of pressure induced magnetic transition in CrO2</p></title><aug><au><snm>Srivastava</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanyal</snm><fnm>SP</fnm></au><au><snm>Rajagopalan</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Indian J Pure Appl Phys</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>397</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B12"><aug><au><snm>Zabel</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Bader</snm><fnm>SD</fnm></au><au><cnm>(Eds)</cnm></au></aug><source>Magnetic Heterostructures: Advances and Perspectives in Spinstructures and Spintransport STMP 227</source><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><pubdate>2008</pubdate></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>