SpringerOpen Newsletter

Receive periodic news and updates relating to SpringerOpen.

Open Access Nano Express

Size-controllable synthesis and bandgap modulation of single-layered RF-sputtered bismuth nanoparticles

Bin-Kun Wu12, Ming-Yau Chern2* and Hsin-Yen Lee2*

Author Affiliations

1 Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

2 Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Da'an District, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

For all author emails, please log on.

Nanoscale Research Letters 2014, 9:249  doi:10.1186/1556-276X-9-249


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249


Received:14 March 2014
Accepted:9 May 2014
Published:21 May 2014

© 2014 Wu et al.; licensee Springer.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Abstract

We here report a simple and efficient method to grow single-layer bismuth nanoparticles (BiNPs) with various sizes on glass substrates. Optimal conditions were found to be 200°C and 0.12 W/cm2 at a growth rate of 6 Å/s, with the deposition time around 40 s. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were used to calculate the particle size distribution statistics, and high-resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were used to examine the chemical interactions between BiNPs and the substrates. By measuring the transmission spectra within the range of 300 to 1,000 nm, we found that the optical bandgap can be modulated from 0.45 to 2.63 eV by controlling the size of these BiNPs. These interesting discoveries offer an insight to explore the dynamic nature of nanoparticles.

Keywords:
Bismuth; Nanoparticle; RF sputtering

Background

Bismuth (Bi) is a group V semi-metallic element with a rhombohedral crystal structure commonly indexed to a hexagonal lattice (a = 4.574 Å, c = 11.80 Å). Several interesting physical properties, such as highly anisotropic Fermi surface, low carrier density, small carrier effective mass, large Fermi wavelength (40 ~ 70 nm at room temperature), and long mean free path (100 nm at room temperature and 400 μm at 4.2 K) [1-5], have made it a potential candidate for many interesting applications. For example, electrodes incorporated with Bi nanostructures can be used to detect heavy metals (such as Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+) in water solution, replacing the traditionally toxic mercury materials [6-8]. Moreover, some of the Bi binary compounds, such as bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3) and bismuth selenide (Bi2Se3), are efficient thermoelectric materials [9,10], and interesting effects related to the temperature dependences of the Seebeck coefficient can be found in Bi nanowires (BiNWs) [11,12]. More recently, these Bi compounds were used in the first experimentally realized three-dimensional topological insulator state in bulk solids [13,14]. Bi nanoparticles (BiNPs) also have been specifically useful in biological science, such as bioimaging [15] and biosensing [16]. As far as preparation of high-quality BiNP samples is concerned, the main challenges remain on the size and morphology control and the lack of sufficient understanding to achieve this control, since the electrical, magnetic, and optical properties of metal nanoparticles depend strongly on the particle size and shape. The band structure of Bi also becomes size-dependent as the dimensions are reduced to the nanometer range, which can lead to a semimetal-semiconductor transition [17].

Generally speaking, BiNPs can be fabricated by several methods, including gas evaporation [18,19], simple chemical method [20-22], and e-beam evaporation [23]. Recently, other methods are also available [24,25]. All these methods have both advantages and drawbacks. For example, in the gas evaporation method, the mean particle diameter is controlled by molecular weight and pressure of the inert gas, which are convenient to produce various diameters of Bi particles. However, it is rather difficult to reproduce the same size with the same parameters. In the simple chemical method, BiNPs are prepared by using the thermal decomposition method of an aqueous precursor, for instance, Bi(SC12H25)3 or BiCl3. This method can prepare dense BiNPs in spherical shapes with enhanced thermoelectric properties, but the processing procedure is complicated, including the preparation of the self-made precursor. Also, it is almost impossible to fabricate BiNP arrays instead of particles that cannot be clearly identified. The e-beam evaporation method has the ability to grow BiNPs in a low deposition rate, but it is hard to control the uniformity of the evaporation rate due to the filament degradation in the electron gun.

Previously, we reported preparation of radio frequency (RF) sputtered BiNWs on glass substrates [26]. In order to study the growth mechanism, different growth temperatures, sputtering power densities, and deposition times were tested, and optimal conditions were found to be 120°C to 160°C, 0.5 W/cm2, and 240 s. The nanowires were straight and long (10 to 50 μm) with a well-defined square cross section. In this work, with suitable chosen parameters, the same experimental setup can be used to grow BiNPs. Compared to the growth of BiNWs, the deposition time and the power density to grow BiNPs are much lower. We were able to deposit BiNPs of various sizes by controlling the deposition time, as the diameters are directly proportional to the deposition time, and only a single layer of BiNPs are grown on the glass surface. Also, we further analyzed the sample quality and the absorption property in a statistical method.

Methods

According to past experience, temperature is the most important factor to grow either a thin film, nanowires, or nanoparticles. Based on this, our strategy is to separate the experiment into three stages, which starts from searching for the best growth temperature. The first stage (experiment A) was to deposit Bi at several different temperatures, while keeping the power density and the deposition time fixed at 0.12 W/cm2 and 60 s, respectively. The second stage (experiment B) was to focus on the relationship between the particle diameter and the deposition duration. We deposited BiNPs with different deposition durations ranging from 10 to 60 s, with the deposition temperature maintained at 200°C and the power density at 0.12 W/cm2. The grain sizes of BiNPs were estimated by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the bandgaps were determined by using the extrapolation method through measuring the visible-light absorption spectrum. The final stage (experiment C) was to deposit BiNPs on sapphire and ITO-coated glass (ITO glass) substrates. The reason why we choose these substrates as a part of our experiment is their possibility to fabricate linear or nonlinear optical devices for further applications. For example, different substrates can act as a light filter if we are interested in utilizing BiNPs to be convex lens for lasers.

We used Corning glass (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) as our substrates in experiments A and B. Prior to deposition, all substrates (6 × 8 mm2) were ultrasonically degreased in acetone and alcohol for 10 min to remove contaminants, followed by rinsing in de-ionized water and drying under N2 flow. For all samples used in these three experiments, the argon pressure was maintained at 3 mTorr, the distance between the Bi target and substrate was 20 mm during growth, and a subsequent cool down process at a rate of −8°C/min brings the sample back to room temperature.

The surface morphology was examined by a LEO 1530 field emission SEM (LEO Elektronenmikroskopie GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany). Structural characteristics were measured by using the high-resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD) method with a Bede D3 diffraction system and a Mac Science M21X X-ray generator (MAC Science Co., Ltd., Yokohama, Japan). High-resolution measurement was performed by using a parabolic Göbel mirror and a pair of channel-cut monochromating crystals in (+, −) setting, where the total divergence of the Cu Kα1 line is less than 10 arc sec. Optical transmittance was measured by a monochromatic Xe lamp and an Acton Research Corporation SpectraDrive spectrometer (Acton Research Corporation, Acton, MA, USA), and the incident light power data acquisition was recorded by a Newport dual-channel power meter model 2832-C power meter (Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA). The parameters of each sample in the experiment are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1. List of BiNPs samples grown at 0.12 W/cm2 with different deposition temperatures and time

Table 2. List of BiNP samples grown at 0.12 W/cm2 with different deposition temperatures

Results and discussion

The SEM images of BiNPs of experiment A at six different temperatures (RT, 60°C, 100°C, 160°C, 200°C, and 240°C) are shown in Figure 1. Samples grown at low temperatures (RT, 60°C, and 100°C) can only be regarded as Bi thin film samples. These samples have smooth surfaces with only a small amount of tiny BiNPs. Samples grown at high temperatures (160°C, 200°C, and 240°C), however, have a large amount of BiNPs. This observation can be clearly understood: in a low-temperature environment, the sputtered Bi composites do not have enough time to form larger crystals before being frozen. At around T = 160°C, a phase transition occurred during the deposition process which kept the sputtered Bi in the liquid state for a sufficient amount of time. During this time, the stronger cohesion of the liquid Bi than the adhesion to the glass surface started to give these nanoparticles the ability to clear the neighborhood around them. The cohesion of the liquid Bi becomes higher with temperature. This gives the explanation to the fact that while the sample grown at 160°C (Bi-104) has BiNPs with apparent edges and corners, the sample grown at 200°C (Bi-105) has BiNPs with spherical shape. Although samples grown over 200°C (Bi-106) did show BiNPs, the results were unstable as the temperature approached the melting point of Bi (271.4°C). The maximum possible temperature to grow a BiNP sample is 250°C, with most Bi composites vaporized after this point. The above results show that the best substrate temperature for feasibly making size-controllable BiNPs is 200°C, which leads us to the next stage of our experiment.

thumbnailFigure 1. SEM images of BiNPs deposited on glass substrates at different temperatures. (a) RT, (b) 60°C, (c) 100°C, (d) 160°C, (e) 200°C, and (f) 240°C, which correspond to sample Bi-101 to Bi-106 in Table 1.

SEM images of BiNPs grown at 200°C and 0.12 W/cm2 for different deposition durations (10 to 60 s) are shown in Figure 2a,b,c,d,e,f. Unlike the thin film-like samples grown at low temperatures, all samples grown at 200°C showed distinct particle-like BiNPs. By depositing samples at this temperature with different durations, we were able to control the size of the BiNPs. Furthermore, samples deposited for shorter durations (10 to 40 s) showed spherical-shape BiNPs, but samples deposited for longer durations (50 and 60 s) showed crystal-like BiNPs. This crystallization behavior can be identified by the XRD pattern (figure not shown here). The ratio of the diffraction peak of the preferred orientation to the other minor peaks becomes stronger as the deposition duration increases.

thumbnailFigure 2. SEM images of BiNPs deposited on glass substrates at 200°C and 0.12 W/cm2 for different deposition durations. (a) 10 s, (b) 20 s, (c) 30 s, (d) 40 s, (e) 50 s, and (f) 60 s, which correspond to sample Bi-201 to Bi-206 in Table 1.

Particle size distribution of samples Bi-201 to Bi-206 can be obtained by measuring the diameters from the SEM images. We use a simple computer program to examine every SEM image file pixel-by-pixel, and the shapes of the BiNPs are identified by their color differences (the color on the substrate is darker than on the nanoparticles). By summing up the pixels, the area of each nanoparticle can be determined, and thus its diameter. In this way, we can calculate the mean diameter of any form within a fixed area of 3.5 μm2. The results are shown in Figure 3, and some of the important statistical values are listed in Table 3. Note that the average diameter of the sample is <a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M1','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M1">View MathML</a>, the standard deviation of each sample is <a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M2','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M2">View MathML</a>, and the peak of lognormal fitting [27] is <a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M3','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M3">View MathML</a>, which corresponds to the mode. There are apparently two lognormal fitting peaks for 50- and 60-s deposited samples, which means that there exist two particle sizes. During the sputtering process, two BiNPs merged to form a larger particle, so extra space emerged as new BiNPs begin to grow. Minimum area for BiNP nucleation can therefore be estimated to be 2.5 × 102 nm2. As a consequence, all of the abovementioned statistical parameters (<a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M4','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M4">View MathML</a>, <a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M5','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M5">View MathML</a>, and <a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M6','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M6">View MathML</a>) increase with the deposition time, but the time dependence of the BiNP density shows a minimum density at 40 s.

thumbnailFigure 3. Particle size distribution statistics and lognormal fitting. (a-d) Samples Bi-201 to Bi-204, and (e, f) samples Bi-205 and Bi-206. The analysis is carried out from SEM images within a fixed area of 3.5 μm2.

Table 3. Particle size statistics and estimated bandgap of samples Bi-201 to Bi-206

The optical bandgap of each sample can be estimated by using the Tauc equation [28]:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M10','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M10">View MathML</a>

(1)

where a is the absorption coefficient, hv is the photon energy, the exponent n depends on the nature of the transition (in our case, n = 1/2 corresponds to the indirect bandgap material [29]), A is a constant, and Eg is the optical bandgap. Traditionally, in thin film samples, a is determined by the equation of transmission T = ead if we neglect the surface and internal multiple reflections, where T is the transmission coefficient and d is the thickness of the film. The Tauc equation is usually used to measure the bandgaps of thin film samples. However, as long as the density of the nanoparticles is high enough, this method is also a good approximation to estimate the bandgaps of nanoparticle samples [30,31]. For a more precise estimation, we adopt another method to calculate α for these samples. Consider light passing through a sphere with radius r in the spherical coordinate system (θ being the polar angle). The vertical distance for the light to travel through the sphere is d = 2rcosθ, and the projected shadow area of the angle is dA = 2πr2cosθsinθdθ. With I0 being the intensity per unit area, the differential intensity of this area dI can be described as

<a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M11','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M11">View MathML</a>

(2)

By deciding T, we can calculate a by the following equations:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M12','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M12">View MathML</a>

(3)

<a onClick="popup('http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M13','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/9/1/249/mathml/M13">View MathML</a>

(4)

We measured the optical transmission spectrum of samples with BiNPs (Bi-201 ~ Bi-206) and Bi thin film (Bi-101) ranging from 300 to 1,000 nm. These data are presented by using a Corning glass as a reference. At higher wavelength, T decreases as the deposition time increases. The absorption edges also shift toward a longer wavelength, indicating a possible bandgap modulation by controlling the size of BiNPs. Figure 4 shows the plot of (αhν)1/2 vs. (), and the estimated bandgaps are determined by the extrapolation (dashed lines) through these curves. The values are listed in Table 3. The bandgap decreases as the diameter of BiNPs increases. The results are reasonable compared with the data acquired by Selzer's group [32], in which the bandgap of 3-nm BiNPs was measured by other methods to be approximately 2 eV.

thumbnailFigure 4. Plot of (ahv)1/2 vs. (hv)for the estimation of indirect bandgap of Bi-201 to Bi-206 and Bi-101. The absorption coefficient α is calculated through the optical transmission spectrum. Dashed lines indicate the extrapolation of the data for optical bandgaps. The inset shows the schematic diagram of light passing through a nanoparticle.

Through chemical reactions with substrates, the quality of BiNPs can be different. The third and final stage of our experiment was to deposit Bi on different substrates (ITO glass and c-plane sapphire). The SEM images of the Bi deposited on ITO glass and on sapphire at low temperatures (below 200°C) show BiNPs of more crystal-like shape, with a density higher than the ones deposited on glass substrates. However, at 200°C, 0.12 W/cm2, and 60 s, only Bi thin films were deposited. This can be seen in Figure 5a (Bi-301) and 5b (Bi-302). The reduction of the formation of BiNPs is due to the oxidation with the substrates. High-resolution XRD spectrum of the BiNPs prepared on c-plane sapphire at 200°C (Bi-304) is shown in Figure 5c. A sharp peak can be ascribed to Al2O3 (006) at 2θ = 42°, together with a broadened minor peak at 2θ = 27.5°. A closer look from 2θ = 24° to 2θ = 30° shown in Figure 5d reveals that this minor peak can be considered as the combination of two distinct peaks, Bi (003) at 27.17° and Bi2O3 at 27.92°. The same conditions occurred on BiNPs deposited on ITO glass. Since pure bismuth samples suffer oxidation gradually, as can be checked by the XRD spectrum measured day by day, we can thus rule out the possibility that the samples were oxidized after they were taken outside. This oxidation effect can be explained by comparing the bonding energies of oxygen with other elements [33-35]. The bonding enthalpies (in unit of kJ/mol) are 337.2 ± 12.6 for Bi-O, 320.1 ± 41.8 for In-O, 531.8 ± 12.6 for Sn-O, 511 ± 3 for Al-O, and 799.6 ± 13.4 for Si-O. As can be clearly seen from this table, the bonding enthalpy between Bi and O is significantly lower than the values between O and other elements, except In-O. This indicates that Bi2O3 can be formed easier than SiO2, Al2O3, In2O3, and SnO2. Once the temperature during deposition process is high enough, the bonding between Al-O, In-O, and Sn-O may be weakened and increase the possibility of the formation of Bi2O3. On the other hand, Si-O bonding is too high for the oxidation process to take place. We thus conclude that once the substrate temperature is high enough, Bi can react with oxygen from substrates to form Bi2O3, which compromises its ability to form BiNPs.

thumbnailFigure 5. SEM images and XRD spectra in experiment C. (a) SEM images of BiNPs deposited on ITO glass substrates at 160 °C (Bi-301). (b) SEM images of BiNPs deposited on ITO glass substrates at 200°C (Bi-302). (c) XRD spectra of the BiNPs prepared on c-plane sapphire at 200°C and 0.12 W/cm2 for 60 s (Bi-304). (d) A closer look from 2θ = 24° to 2θ = 30°, in which Bi(003) and Bi2O3 diffraction peaks can be identified.

Conclusions

We present a systematic experiment to measure the optimal conditions to grow a single layer of BiNPs on various substrates by using a RF sputtering system at 200 °C, using 0.12 W/cm2. With suitable chosen parameters, BiNP samples were successfully fabricated, instead of BiNWs and Bi thin films. Since the optical bandgap decreases as the diameter of BiNPs increases, we were able to modulate their values by depositing various sizes of BiNPs. All these data and sample statistics are listed in the tables for future references.

Abbreviations

BiNPs: bismuth nanoparticles; BiNWs: bismuth nanowires; ITO: indium tin oxide; RF: radio frequency; SEM: scanning electron microscope; XRD: X-ray diffraction.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HYL and BKW conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. MYC coordinated the projects. BKW helped with the preparation of Bi nanoparticles. BKW and HYL helped with the FESEM, XRD, and optical transmission spectra characterization. All other works were carried out by BKW. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors' information

HYL obtained his Ph.D. degree at National Taiwan University (NTU) and is currently a post-doctoral fellow of the Department of Physics, NTU. BKW obtained his Ph.D. degree at NTU and is currently a post-doctoral fellow of the Institute of Biomedical Engineering, NTU. MYC obtained his Ph.D. degree at Cornell University, USA, and is currently a professor of Physics, NTU.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Council of the Republic of China under contract no. NSC 101-2112-M-002-026. HYL acknowledges support by the Aim for Top University Project of National Taiwan University (Grant No. 102R4000). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Instrumentation Center, National Taiwan University, for operational support of the LEO 1530 field emission SEM. Finally, we would also like to thank Prof. Chi-Te Liang for helpful discussions.

References

  1. Yang FY, Liu K, Hong K, Reich DH, Searson PC, Chien CL: Large magnetoresistance of electrodeposited single-crystal bismuth thin films.

    Science 1999, 284:1335-1337. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Black MR, Padi M, Cronin SB, Lin YM, Rabin O, McClure T, Dresselhaus G, Hagelstein PL, Dresselhaus MS: Intersubband transitions in bismuth nanowires.

    Appl Phys Lett 2000, 77:4142-4144. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Zhang Z, Sun X, Dresselhaus MS, Ying JY, Heremans J: Electronic transport properties of single-crystal bismuth nanowire arrays.

    J Phys Rev B 2000, 61:4850-4861. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Wang YW, Kim JS, Kim GH, Kim KS: Quantum size effects in the volume plasmon excitation of bismuth nanoparticles investigated by electron energy loss spectroscopy.

    Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88:143106. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Heremans J, Thrush CM: Thermoelectric power of bismuth nanowires.

    Phys Rev B 1999, 59:12 579-12 583. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Yang H, Li J, Lu X, Xi G, Yan Y: Reliable synthesis of bismuth nanoparticles for heavy metal detection.

    Mater Res Bull 2013, 48:4718-4722. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Lee GJ, Lee HM, Rhee CK: Bismuth nano-powder electrode for trace analysis of heavy metals using anodic stripping voltammetry.

    Electrochem Commun 2007, 9:2514-2518. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Zhang Z, Yu K, Bai D, Zhu Z: Synthesis and electrochemical sensing toward heavy metals of bunch-like bismuth nanostructures.

    Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5:398-402. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Zhou J, Li S, Soliman HMA, Toprak MS, Muhammed M, Platzek D, Muller E: Seebeck coefficient of nanostructured phosphorus-alloyed bismuth telluride thick films.

    J Alloy Compd 2009, 471:278-281. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Kadel K, Kumari L, Li WZ, Huang JY, Provencio PP: Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of Bi2Se3 nanostructures.

    J Nanopart Res 2011, 6:57. OpenURL

  11. Murata M, Nakamura D, Hasegawa Y, Komine T, Taguchi T, Nakamura S, Jovovic V, Heremans JP: Thermoelectric properties of bismuth nanowires in a quartz template.

    Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94:192104. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Nikolaeva A, Huber TE, Gitsu D, Konopko L: Diameter-dependent thermopower of bismuth nanowires.

    Phys Rev B 2008, 77:035422. OpenURL

  13. Hsieh D, Qian D, Wray L, Xia Y, Hor YS, Cava RJ, Hasan MZ: A topological Dirac insulator in a quantum spin Hall phase.

    Nature 2008, 452:970-975. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Wang E, Ding H, Fedorov AV, Yao W, Li Z, Lv YF, Zhao K, Zhang LG, Xu Z, Schneeloch J, Zhong R, Ji SH, Wang L, He K, Ma X, Gu G, Yao H, Xue QK, Chen X, Zhou S: Fully gapped topological surface states in Bi2Se3 films induced by a d-wave high-temperature superconductor.

    Nature Phys 2013, 9:621-625. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Rabin O, Perez JM, Grimm J, Wojtkiewicz G, Weissleder R: An X-ray computed tomography imaging agent based on long-circulating bismuth sulphide nanoparticles.

    Nature Mater 2006, 5:118-122. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Ding SN, Shan D, Xue HG, Cosnier S: A promising biosensing-platform based on bismuth oxide polycrystalline-modified electrode: characterization and its application in development of amperometric glucose sensor.

    Bioelectrochemistry 2010, 79:218-222. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Lin YM, Sun X, Dresselhaus MS: Theoretical investigation of thermoelectric transport properties of cylindrical Bi nanowires.

    Phys Rev B 2000, 62:4610-4623. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Sherriff RE, Devaty RP: Size effect in the far-infrared magneto-optical absorption of small bismuth particles.

    Phys Rev B 1993, 48:1525-1536. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Panda S, Pratsinis SE: Modeling the synthesis of aluminum particles by evaporation-condensation in an aerosol flow reactor.

    Nanostructured Mater 1995, 5:755-767. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Carotenuto G, Hison CL, Capezzuto F, Palomba M, Perlo P, Conte P: Synthesis and thermoelectric characterisation of bismuth nanoparticles.

    J Nanopart Res 2009, 11:1729-1738. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Wang F, Tang R, Yu H, Gibbons PC, Buhro WE: Size- and shape-controlled synthesis of bismuth nanoparticles.

    Chem Mater 2008, 20:3656-3662. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Wang YW, Hong BH, Kim KS: Size control of semimetal bismuth nanoparticles and the UV-visible and IR absorption spectra.

    J Phys Chem B 2005, 109:7067-7072. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Hackens B, Minet JP, Faniel S, Farhi G, Gustin C, Issi JP, Heremans JP, Bayot V: Quantum transport, anomalous dephasing, and spin-orbit coupling in an open ballistic bismuth nanocavity.

    Phys Rev B 2003, 67:121403. OpenURL

  24. Li Y, Zang L, Li Y, Liu Y, Liu C, Zhang Y, He H, Wang C: Photoinduced topotactic growth of bismuth nanoparticles from bulk SrBi2Ta2O9.

    Chem Mater 2013, 25:2045-2050. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Soltani T, Entezari MH: Solar photocatalytic degradation of BR5 by ferrite bismuth nanoparticles synthesized via ultrasound.

    Ultrason Sonochem 2013, 20:1245-1253. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Wu BK, Lee HY, Chern MY: Bismuth nanowire grown naturally using a sputtering system.

    Appl Phys Express 2013, 6:035504. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Phanikumar G, Dutta P, Galun R, Chattopadhyay K: Microstructural evolution during remelting of laser surface alloyed hyper-monotectic Al-Bi alloy.

    Mat Sci Eng A 2004, 371:91-102. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Pankove JI: Optical Processes in Semiconductors. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1971. OpenURL

  29. Buchholz DB, Liu J, Marks TJ, Zhang M, Chang RPH: Control and characterization of the structural, electrical, and optical properties of amorphous zinc-indium-tin oxide thin films.

    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2009, 1:2147-2153. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Satoh N, Nakashima T, Kamikura K, Yamamoto K: Quantum size effect in TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by finely controlled metal assembly on dendrimer templates.

    Nature Nanotech 2008, 3:106-111. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Balamurugan B, Aruna I, Mehta BR, Shivaprasad SM: Size-dependent conductivity-type inversion in Cu2O nanoparticles.

    Phys Rev B 2004, 69:165419. OpenURL

  32. Marchak D, Glozman D, Vinshtein Y, Jarby S, Lereah Y, Cheshnovsky O, Selzer Y: Large anisotropic conductance and band gap fluctuations in nearly round-shape bismuth nanoparticles.

    Nano Lett 2012, 12:1087-1091. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Mark Winter: Oxygen: bond enthalpies in gaseous diatomic species. [https://www.webelements.com/oxygen/bond_enthalpies.html webcite]

  34. Mukhopadhyay S, Gowtham S, Pandey R, Costales A: Theoretical study of small clusters of indium oxide: InO, In2O, InO2, In2O2.

    J Mol Struct-Theochem 2010, 948:31-35. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Hu YQ, Zhao YP, Yu TX: Fractal pattern formation in anodic bonding of Pyrex glass/Al/Si.

    Int J Nonlin Sci Num 2008, 9:315-322. OpenURL