Abstract
We report the transport characteristics of a novel transistor based on the electronic structure modulation of the channel. The gate voltagecontrolled current modulation arises from the bandwidth manipulation of a midgap or a nearmidgap state. We show that the transistor exhibits a gain and overcomes the 2.3 k_{B}T/decade thermal limit in the inverse subthreshold slope where k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant. The unique device physics also opens up many novel applications.
Keywords:
Electronic structure modulation; Graphene; Transistor; Electric field; Subthreshold slope; GainBackground
We present a novel concept for modulating the channel transport by allelectronic means. The working principle is based on the electronic structure modulation of a midgap or a nearmidgap state due to an electric field by applying a gate voltage. Small bandwidths (BW) have large effective masses and hence poor transport characteristics due to strong scattering. This leads to the off state of the transistor. The on state has a large bandwidth and hence smaller effective mass, which gives the higher desired conduction. The proposed transistor, namely electronic structure modulation transistor (EMT), has also been analyzed as a possible replacement for metal oxide semiconductor fieldeffect transistor technology [1].
Conventional fieldeffect transistors (FET) rely on the band edge shift using an external gate voltage. Hence, FETs are limited by the 2.3 k_{B}T/decade thermal limit in their subthreshold inverse slope [2], where k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature. With the scaling of the supply voltage, channel leakage current increases [2,3], making the power dissipation a serious challenge. It is, therefore, desirable to reduce the off current with a low supply voltage by overcoming the subthreshold thermal limit, while retaining the gain and high speed device (picosecond) and circuit (nanosecond) operation. Various devices have been under study as possible candidates to replace FETs in complementary metaloxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology [1].
Concepts based on the modulation of various device parameters have been explored earlier. For example, velocity/mobility modulation transistors rely on the realspace transfer of carriers between two adjacent materials with different mobilities [3]. Similarly, quantum modulation transistors are based on the constructive and destructive interference of the wavefunctions in the channel by electrically changing the Tshaped box dimensions [4]. Furthermore, quantum effects in various planar heterostructures based on the modulationdoped fieldeffect transistor principle have been explored [5], where the fieldeffect is used to perturb the barrier for carriers flowing between the source and the drain electrodes. The localization of the state near the band edges due to disorder in the Anderson localization is also a relevant concept, which leads to a mobility edge [6], but this effect is also limited by the thermal limit. In this paper, our objective is to show that the proposed EMT may become a viable candidate for lowpower applications within the device and circuit performance constraints under extreme scaling.
Methods
Operating principle
A nearmidgap state in the zigzag graphene nanoribbon (zzGNR) [7] with periodic edge roughness is extensively studied in [8]. In this work, we study novel device characteristics where the channel consists of a 1nm wide zzGNR as shown in Figure 1a. The device structure is shown in Figure 1b, where the channel is gated by two side gates to create an electric field in the width direction. For such a sidegated nanoribbon, we show the electronic structure in Figure 1c using extended Hückel theory (see [812] for the detailed model). The two interesting electronic structure features are a significant band gap opening of about 2 eV, which is not very sensitive to the external electric field, and secondly a nearmidgap state with a finite bandwidth, the bandwidth and dispersion of which can be manipulated by the gateinduced electric field. In Figure 1d, we show the dependence of the bandwidth on the gate voltage in the limit of relative permittivity of the gate dielectric to be much larger than that of the nanoribbon.
Figure 1. Device structure and operating principle of an electronic structure modulation transistor. (a) The channel consists of a 1nm wide hydrogenated zigzag graphene nanoribbon with edge roughness. (b) The channel is sidegated to create an electric field in the width direction. Gate dielectric surrounds the channel and is not shown for clarity. (c) For such a ribbon, a nearmidgap state with a small bandwidth is observed which can be modulated by the gateinduced electric field (left = 0 V/nm electric field, middle = 0.2 V/nm electric field, right = zoomed bandwidth comparison for the two electric fields). (d) The bandwidth of the nearmidgap state is linearly dependent on the gate voltage [8].
Such a bandwidth modulation can be understood in terms of the realspace localization of the wavefunction for various momentum values. At the Γ point, the wavefunction of the nearmidgap state is distributed throughout the nanoribbon width, whereas at the X point is localized on the pristine edge. Additionally, the wavefunctions are localized on only one sublattice of graphene [8]. By applying a positive gate voltage at this edge, the energy values shift downward, thereby increasing the bandwidth as shown in Figure 1c. One should note that such modulation may happen due to intrinsic or extrinsic electric fields. In case of gatevoltageinduced modulation (extrinsic electric field) as shown in Figure 1d, the BW is given as follows:
where α is a dimensionless parameter, called the modulation factor. BW_{o} is the residual BW at zero gate voltage (Mag ≡ absolute magnitude) and V_{g} is the applied gate voltage. In Figure 1d, α = 0.47 and BW_{o} = 0.12 eV. With increasing width of the nanoribbon, the residual bandwidth BW_{o}, the modulation factor α, and the band gaps are expected to decrease [8]. One could vary the device width, which will still result in qualitatively similar characteristics, as far as the conduction and valence band edges are well isolated from the nearmidgap state.
Next, we consider the transport through the graphene nanoribbon by applying drain bias. In the limit of small drain bias, the channel transport is only dependent on the bandwidth of the nearmidgap state. For zero bandwidth, no channel current flows through this state in the coherent limit, except for the dielectric leakage current and tunneling through the higher bands, which should be small given the conduction (valence) band is above (below) the localized state by about 1 eV. By applying a gate voltage to increase the bandwidth of the state, the channel current starts to flow. The operation of the EMT in this mode is equivalent to that of an nMOS; hence, we refer to it as nEMT. The equivalents of pEMT can be realized by simply reversing the gate connections to induce an electric field in the reverse direction [8]. This allelectronic scheme thus operates under complementary mode. We envision that such transistor action is more general and can be achieved in any dimension with a nearmidgap state in the channel region, the bandwidth of which can be modulated by the external voltage and for which, one can make ohmic contacts with the midgap state. In the limit of high bias, this transport picture changes, which we discuss later. So far, to the best of our knowledge, an experimental observation of such a state in a zzGNR has not been made.
Theoretical model
To understand the transport in the highbias regime, we consider a gedanken onedimensional device and start with the ansatz of Equation 1. For such a device, we use singleband tightbinding approximation [13], where the channel bandwidth is 4t_{o} and t_{o} is the nearest neighbor hopping parameter. For simplicity, we take five lattice points in the device region corresponding to a channel length and width of about 2 and 1 nm, respectively. The channel length can be decreased to about 1 nm as long as there is an unperturbed region in the middle with a nearmidgap state, whereas the upper limit on the channel length can be bound by the scattering length, which can be in micrometer range for graphene. Similarly, the width can be varied as well which will result in a different gate voltage applied to achieve similar device characteristics. The Laplace’s potential due to the drain bias (V_{d}) is included as a linear voltage drop. The Hartree potential is ignored for simplicity, since it does not affect the device operating principle, although it may affect the quantitative results. The choice of a simple model allows us to study the device and the circuit characteristics in terms of the modulation factor α and the residual bandwidth BW_{o}. The transport characteristics of EMTs with different channel materials can thus be conveniently casted into this model very efficiently.
For the quantum transport, we use the nonequilibrium Green’s function formalism [14]. We consider the coherent limit where it is equivalent to the Landaüer’s approach, and the current can be evaluated from the transmission as below:
where transmission is T(E) = tr(Γ_{s}GΓ_{d}G^{+}). The Green’s function for the channel is
where I is an identity matrix and U_{L} is the Laplace’s potential drop. Selfenergies and broadening functions are and Γ_{s,d} = i[Σ_{s,d} − Σ_{s,d}^{+}], respectively. are the contact Fermi functions. μ_{s,d} are source/drain chemical potentials. μ_{d} is shifted due to drain bias as μ_{d} = μ_{o} − qV_{d} and μ_{s} = μ_{o}, where μ_{o} is the equilibrium chemical potential.
Results and discussion
We next discuss the numerical results for a transistor with α = 0.4 and BW_{o} = 0.1 eV. The transfer characteristics with V_{d} = 0.16, 0.18 and 0.2 V are shown in Figure 2a. A steep subthreshold slope is obtained with a high on/off current ratio. The threshold voltage depends on the drain voltage V_{d}, and it increases with the drain bias  a trend opposite to the draininduced barrier lowering of a FET. The subthreshold current much below the threshold voltage, which is due to the reflections from the barrier of the nearmidgap state, decreases exponentially.
Figure 2. Transport characteristics. (a) Transfer characteristics show steep subthreshold characteristics with drainvoltage dependent threshold voltage shift. (b) Output characteristics show a saturating behavior followed by a negative differential resistance. (c) With increasing drain bias, the transmission window shrinks due to a spectral misalignment (Addition file 1). (d) The increasing Fermi function difference between the two contacts and the decreasing transmission lead to an increasing and then decreasing T(E)[f_{s} − f_{d}] function.
We further report the output characteristics in Figure 2b for V_{g} = 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.2 V, which show a negative differential resistance (NDR) behavior that is crucial for the lowpower inverter operation (Additional file 1). The current cutoff mechanism is similar to the Bloch condition through minibands in superlattices, giving rise to an NDR event, when the drain voltage exceeds the miniband width [15,16]. The miniband in superlattices is formed by the overlap of quantized states through tunnel barriers, inherently leading to small miniband widths and large effective masses [17]. The NDR events mediated by minibands have been reported in IIIV heterostructures [18] and graphene superlattices [19]. However, the peaktovalley ratio in such structures is limited to about 1.1 to 1.2. In comparison, the NDR feature reported for nearmidgap state in this work shows a peaktovalley ratio of greater than 10^{3}, which is important for the lowpower operation. The reason behind a higher ratio could be the formation of a midgap state band without any tunnel barriers, giving rise to higher conduction to yield a large peak current compared to the role of tunnel barriers in the miniband conduction, which lead to a small peak current due to quantum mechanical tunneling. On the other hand, the nearmidgap state in this work is highly sensitive to the edge geometry. Therefore, achieving high material quality (with defect density less than parts per billion) is imperative for a proper operation of the proposed transistor. Moreover, the bandwidth of the nearmidgap state is gatevoltage dependent; the V_{d} corresponding to peak and valley currents increases with increasing gate bias V_{g} due to a larger conduction window. Such peculiar drain voltagedependent transport features are not exclusive for this device. In a threeterminal device, the electrostatics due to the drain bias introduces various nontrivial effects, e.g., pinchoff in FETs, etc.
Additional file 1. Supplementary information. Channel conduction window and output characteristics for nEMT.
Format: DOCX Size: 87KB Download file
To understand these device characteristics further, we report the drain bias dependence of the transmission window in Figure 2c for a gate voltage of 0.2 V. Without any drain bias, a wide transmission window is observed, which monotonically decreases with increasing bias (see Additional file 1 for further discussion). It is more interesting to look at the product of the transmission and the Fermi function difference of source/drain contacts T(E)[f_{s} − f_{d}]. With the increasing bias, since the Fermi function difference monotonically increases, the overall trend as shown in Figure 2d is observed. Using Equation 2, one can also relate these trends in Figure 2d to the negative differential resistance trends of Figure 2b.
In the reported device, the threshold voltage can be engineered by optimizing the side gate electrostatics to vary the modulation factor α. Yet, another way to change the threshold voltage is by engineering the work function of the side gate materials to create an intrinsic electric field, thereby changing the BW_{o}. nEMT device characteristics are shown in Figure 2. Similarly, by gate workfunction and dielectric engineering, one can also achieve pEMT characteristics by reversing the gate connections. Moreover, the optical phonon energy in graphene is about 200 meV. The choice of 0.2 V supply voltage allows us to ignore the electron–phonon inelastic scattering in these calculations.
Next, we calculate the inverter characteristics using the complementary characteristics in Additional file 1. The voltage transfer curve of an inverter, formed by a pEMT and an nEMT connected back to back, is shown in Figure 3. The proposed symbols for nEMT and pEMT are also shown. The transfer characteristics show a steep slope. The high and low noise margins are 0.082V, which ensure a selfcorrecting digital operation. The maximum magnitude of gain is about 18, whereas the magnitude of gain around 0.1 V of input/output voltage is about 1.6. Although EMT has a severe drain biasdependent threshold voltage shift, the NDR in the output characteristics ensures that the power dissipation occurs only during the switching (see Additional file 1 for further discussion). Moreover, the stable state around 0.1 V input voltage becomes more interesting, which can be used to build threevalued logic and memory devices.
Figure 3. Inverter characteristics. EMT inverter shows a large gain and appreciable noise margins. The circuit diagram with p and nEMTs is shown in the inset.
Conclusions
We have reported an allelectronic transistor with low supply voltage based on the electronic structure modulation of a nearmidgap state in the channel using an external gate voltage. The device physics, however, may lead to various applications of technological importance. We have shown that one can obtain gain and large on/off channel current ratio with few k_{B}T supply voltage. We envision that the transistors based on the electronic structure modulation can open up a new class of postCMOS logic devices. The concept is analyzed in zzGNR, provided the challenges related to the atomic control of the graphene nanoribbon edge quality and side gate electrostatics, and ohmic contacts with the nearmidgap state can be overcome.
Competing interests
Author declares that he has no competing interests.
Authors’ information
HR is an assistant professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Iowa since May 2009. For two years, he was a postdoctoral associate at Cornell University. He received his BS on July 2001 from the University of Engineering and Technology Lahore Pakistan, MSc on December 2002, and Ph.D. on May 2007 from Purdue University. He has received “Magoon Award for Excellence in Teaching” from Purdue University. He is also the recipient of “Presidential Faculty Fellowship” and “Old Gold Fellowship” from the University of Iowa. His research group is focused on “anything that is small” for lowpower postCMOS transistor, spintronics, sensors, and solidstate energy harvesting applications from theoretical, experimental, and computational approaches using graphene, molecule, silicon, novel dielectrics, and carbon nanotube material systems. He has served as an editor of a 600page book on Graphene Nanoelectronics published by Springer in 2012.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge fruitful discussions with E. C. Kan and T. H. Hou about the experimental implementation of the transistor. We are grateful to T. Z. Raza for the computer codes of the tightbinding models. We are also thankful to S. Datta, D. R. Andersen, M. A. Alam, D. Stewart, K. Bernstein, and J. Welser for the useful discussion.
References

Bernstein K, Cavin RK, Porod W, Seabaugh A, Welser J: Device and architecture outlook for beyond CMOS switches.

Taur Y, Ning TH: Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

Sze SM: Physics of Semiconductor Devices. New York: WileyInterscience; 1981.

Sols F, Macucci M, Ravaioli U, Hess K: On the possibility of transistor action based on quantum interference phenomena.
Appl Phys Lett 1989, 54:350352. Publisher Full Text

Ismail KE, Bagwell PF, Orlando TP, Antoniadis DA, Smith HI: Quantum phenomena in fieldeffectcontrolled semiconductor nanostructures.
Proc IEEE 1991, 79:11061116. Publisher Full Text

Barnham K, Vvedensky DD: Lowdimensional Semiconductor Structures: Fundamentals and Device Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

Raza H: Graphene Nanoelectronics: Metrology, Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.

Raza H: Zigzag graphene nanoribbons: bandgap and midgap state modulation.
J Phys Condens Matter 2011, 23:382203382207. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Raza H, Kan EC: An extended Hückel theory based atomistic model for graphene nanoelectronics.
J Comp Elec 2008, 7:372375. Publisher Full Text

Raza H, Kan EC: Armchair graphene nanoribbons: electronic structure and electric field modulation.

Raza H, Kan EC: Field modulation in bilayer graphene band structure.
J Phys Condens Matter 2009, 21:102202102205. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Raza H: Passivation and edge effects in armchair graphene nanoribbons.

Kittel C: Introduction to Solid State Physics. New York: WileyInterscience; 1996.

Datta S: Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

Esaki L, Tsu R: Superlattice and Negative differential conductivity in semiconductors.

Tsu R, Esaki H: Tunneling in a finite superlattice.
Appl Phys Lett 1973, 22:562564. Publisher Full Text

Grahn HT: Semiconductor Superlattices: Growth and Electronic Properties. Hackensack: World Scientific; 1995.

Deutschmanna RA, Wegscheidera W, Rothera M, Bichlera M, Abstreitera G: Negative differential resistance of a 2D electron gas in a 1D miniband.
Physica E 2000, 7:294298. Publisher Full Text

Ferreira GJ, Ferreira GJ, Leuenberger MN, Loss D, Egues JC: Lowbias negative differential resistance in graphene nanoribbon superlattices.