Table 1 |
||||||||
| Comparison ofϕf and Stokes shift of CdTe QDs | ||||||||
| Synthesis time | GSH | TGA | MPA | TGH | ||||
| ϕf(%) | Stokes shift (meV) | ϕf(%) | Stokes shift (meV) | ϕf(%) | Stokes shift (meV) | ϕf(%) | Stokes shift (meV) | |
| 30 min | 38 | 162 | 70 | 289 | 44 | 222 | 15 | 380 |
| 1 h | 49 | 160 | 58 | 211 | 73 | 231 | 38 | 353 |
| 2 h | 35.5 | 134 | 54.5 | 224 | 71 | 207 | 20 | 329 |
| 4 h | 31 | 169 | 14.5 | 206 | 63.5 | 180 | 13 | 297 |
CdTe QDs capped with GSH, TGA, MPA, and TGH at different synthesis times.
Silva et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2012 7:536 doi:10.1186/1556-276X-7-536