The tunable terahertz intersubband Landau level transitions in resonant tunneling cascade quantum well structures are considered. The way of lifting the selection rule forbidding the inter-Landau level terahertz transitions of interest by applying a magnetic field tilted with respect to the structure layers is proposed. The importance of asymmetric structure design to achieve considerable values of transition dipole matrix elements is demonstrated.
Keywords:Quantum well structures; Landau levels; terahertz transitions.
Recently, the possibility to achieve a population inversion in the system of Landau levels (LL) in cascade quantum well structures in strong magnetic field under a condition of sequential resonant tunneling, i.e., in strong transverse electric field, was shown . If the spacing between the first and any upper (νth) subbands is lower than the optical phonon energy (i.e., when the optical phonon scattering is suppressed), the population of zeroth LL in νth subband can exceed that of the first LL in the first subband. So, the stimulated emission of terahertz radiation can be achieved on the transitions between these LLs, and the emission frequency may continuously be tuned in a wide range of terahertz frequencies by the variation of the magnetic field strength according to the relation
where is the subband spacing and ωc is the cyclotron frequency. A scheme of transitions between Landau levels of subbands 1 and 2 in a quantum well structure considered in  is shown in Figure 1. The main problem arising is that in a magnetic field directed perpendicularly to the structure layers, the optical transition of interest, shown in Figure 1, is forbidden, i.e., the corresponding dipole matrix element is exactly equal to zero.
Figure 1. A scheme of transitions between Landau levels in a quantum well. The thick arrow indicates the (2, 0) → (1,1) radiative transition, and the wavy arrows mark the transitions due to the electron–electron scattering.
In , we proposed a possible way to overcome the difficulty and to provide nonzero matrix element values for transitions of interest by tilting the magnetic field with respect to the structure layers. In the present paper, we investigated the effect of magnetic field tilt on the optical matrix element of the intersubband Landau level transitions. The importance of an asymmetric structure design to achieve substantial values of transition dipole matrix elements was revealed, and an asymmetric two-well periodic structure was proposed as a possible solution maximizing the optical matrix element of the terahertz transitions of interest.
Let us consider the electron in the quantum well structure in the tilted magnetic field , where z is the growth axis. In Landau gauge , the electron envelope wave function is given by 
In the case of the magnetic field being normal to the structure layers, the variables in the Schroedinger equation are separated, and energy levels and electron wave functions are given by the expressions 
where is the wave function of harmonic oscillator with mass and frequency , and and are the energy and wave function of νth subband. Here, the small effect of the effective lowering of the barrier height with the increasing of the Landau level number n  is neglected.
It can be easily seen that in this case, the dipole matrix element
However, the matrix element of the specified transition can be made nonzero by applying an additional component of the magnetic field parallel to the layers, that is, by tilting the magnetic field with respect to the structure layers. Now, due to an additional term
arising in Equation 4, the variables in the Schroedinger equation are no longer separated, resulting in the mixing of in-plane and out-of-plane electron motions  and lifting of the above selection rule. The effect is similar to the violation of the Δn = 0 selection rule for the resonant tunneling transitions between the Landau levels in the tilted magnetic field [4-10].
Here, we will consider the situation when the matrix element of the Hamiltonian (Equation 6) over the first and second subband stated (Equation 8) is much lower than the subband spacing. This is the case in the magnetic field range when . The structure of a single-electron spectrum in the tilted magnetic field in this case does not change significantly [4-10]. The main effect of is the shift of the harmonic oscillator center in Equation 8 by the value , where is the average value of the electron coordinate along the z axis in the νth subband state:
Substituting wave functions (Equation 11) into Equation 9, the following expression can be obtained for the squared modulus of the dipole matrix element:
In symmetric well potential , the subband wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to symmetry center of the potential, and the averages are the same for all subbands. So, in symmetric potential, the transition matrix element continues to be close to zero even in the tilted magnetic field. Thus, to provide a nonzero dipole matrix element for transitions of interest along with the application of the tilted magnetic field, it is necessary to introduce an asymmetric potential along the direction of the structure growth.
Results and discussion
The simplest solution is to apply an electric field along the structure growth axis especially as the electric field is necessary to provide the resonant tunneling pumping of the LLs of the upper subband. In Figure 2, the calculated dependence of the dipole matrix element of the (2,0) → (1,1) transition in the GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well on the applied electric field is shown. It can be seen that the application of the electric field results in the nonzero dipole matrix element. Nevertheless, since the possible values of the electric field strength are determined by resonant tunneling conditions and cannot be selected independently, this way of providing a nonzero matrix element is not very effective.
Figure 2. Calculated dependencies of the dipole matrix element on the applied electric field. Squared modulus of the dipole matrix element | D(2,0)→(1,1)|2 versus the voltage drop eFa per quantum well for different values of the parallel component of the magnetic field B ∥ = 1 to 5 T. The calculation was performed for the 250-Å GaAs/Al0.3 Ga0.7As quantum well. The transverse component of the magnetic field is B ⊥ = 5 T.
More effective is the use of an asymmetric design of the structures themselves. One of the possible solutions is to introduce an asymmetric double well as an active element of the periodic cascade quantum well, consisting of two strongly coupled wells with different widths (Figure 3a), as an active element of the periodic cascade quantum well structure. In the asymmetric double quantum well, the first subband wave function is located mainly in the wider well, while the second subband wave function is shifted to the narrower well (Figure 3b). As a result, a significant difference between average coordinates and is achieved (Figure 3c).
Figure 3. An asymmetric double well as an active element in periodic cascade quantum well structure. ( a) Proposed design of the active element of the periodic cascade quantum well structure and the calculated wave functions of the first and second subbands. ( b) The dependence of the 1 to 2 intersubband spacing on the narrow well width aR. (c) The values of the averages 〈z〉ν for corresponding subbands as a function of narrow well width aR.
The dipole matrix element for transitions between the zeroth LL of the second subband and the first LL of the first subband is presented in Figure 4 as a function of narrow quantum well width aR.. Here, the width of wider well is fixed, while the width aR of the narrow well is varied. A pronounced maximum can be seen at aR = 110 Å, and the maximum achievable value of |D(2,0)→(1,1)|2 is considerably higher than that in previously considered case of the single symmetric quantum well in transverse electric field (see Figure 2 for comparison).
Of course, the structure considered is an example proposed here to illustrate the general way of how the selection rule forbidding the transitions of interest can be overcome. More detailed simulations, including the direct calculations of the tunneling characteristics and optical gain, are necessary to optimize the structure design.
Finally, the terahertz transitions between Landau levels of different subbands in resonant tunneling quantum well structures in a tilted magnetic field were considered. An effective way was proposed to lift the selection rule forbidding the intersubband inter-Landau level transitions by placing the structures into the tilted magnetic field. An importance of asymmetrical structure potential was revealed, and the possibility to achieve considerable values of inter-Landau level transition matrix element was demonstrated for an asymmetric double-well structure.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MPT participated in the general task formulation and carried out the theoretical background and intersubband matrix element calculations. YAM of conceived the general task formulation, participated in the study design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. PFK carried out the simulation program development and energy band structure calculations and participated in the sequence alignment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The work was supported by the Russian Basic Research Foundation (grants nos. 09-02-00671 and 08-02-92505-NCNIL), the RF President grant for young scientists (no. МК-916.2009.2), the MISIS grant no. 3400022, and the Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation program “Scientific and Pedagogical Personnel of Innovative Russia in 2009–2013”.
JETP Letters 2010, 92(6):401. Publisher Full Text
Phys Rev 1967, 163:816. Publisher Full Text
Phys Rev B 1995, 52:8305. Publisher Full Text
Semiconductors 2006, 40:581.
trans: Fiz Tekh Poluprovodn 2006, 40:597Publisher Full Text
Semicond Sci Technol 1991, 6:1021. Publisher Full Text
Phys Rev B 1991, 44:13795. Publisher Full Text
Phys Rev B 1992, 46:12554. Publisher Full Text
J Phys Condens Matter 1993, 5:A365. Publisher Full Text
Phys Rev B 1998, 57:9114. Publisher Full Text
JETP 2006, 103(3):428. Publisher Full Text