Abstract
Temperature and carrier densitydependent spin dynamics for GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells (QWs) with different structural symmetries have been studied by using timeresolved Kerr rotation technique. The spin relaxation time is measured to be much longer for the symmetrically designed GaAs QW comparing with the asymmetrical one, indicating the strong influence of Rashba spinorbit coupling on spin relaxation. D'yakonovPerel' mechanism has been revealed to be the dominant contribution for spin relaxation in GaAs/AlGaAs QWs. The spin relaxation time exhibits nonmonotonicdependent behavior on both temperature and photoexcited carrier density, revealing the important role of nonmonotonic temperature and density dependence of electronelectron Coulomb scattering. Our experimental observations demonstrate good agreement with recently developed spin relaxation theory based on microscopic kinetic spin Bloch equation approach.
Introduction
Spin dynamics and the related physics in semiconductors have drawn much attention in the past years because of its importance to realize novel spinelectronic devices [1]. In recent years, electron spin relaxation in many types of materials, especially in low dimensional IIIV group semiconductor heterostructures, has been studied extensively both theoretically and experimentally [1]. The relevant spin relaxation mechanisms, such as the ElliottYafet, BirAranovPikus (BAP), and D'yakonovPerel' (DP) mechanisms as well as hyperfine interactions, have been well established to describe spin relaxation and dephasing dynamics. However, the relative importance of these mechanisms strongly depends on material design and temperature as well as carrier concentration and so on. Previous investigations in literature show that the BAP mechanism dominates the spin relaxation at low temperatures for bulk GaAs [2,3] and GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells (QWs) [4,5], whereas DP mechanism dominates spin relaxation in other regimes. However, recent reexaminations using the microscopic kinetic spin Bloch equation approach [69] have revealed that the BAP mechanism is much less important than DP mechanism for intrinsic IIIV group semiconductors, even at low temperatures. The DP mechanism resulting from spinorbit coupling in systems lacking inversion symmetry, such as zincblende structure or asymmetric confining potentials in QWs, has a spin relaxation rate inversely related to the momentum scattering rate [9]. Electron spin relaxation in GaAs QWs has been experimentally studied through temperature [10,11] and QW width dependence [1012], and DP mechanism has been revealed to dominate spin relaxation in intrinsic QWs at high temperatures [10]. The oscillatory spin dynamics study for twodimensional electron gas (2DEG) at low temperatures also demonstrated the dominance of DP mechanism in the weak momentum scattering regime [13]. The observed enhancement of spin relaxation time resulting from electronelectron scattering in ndoped GaAs/AlGaAs QW agrees with DP mechanism governed by electronelectron scattering as well [1417]. The experimental observation of electron spin relaxation time maximum for temperaturedependent study in a highmobility GaAs/AlGaAs 2DEG has also revealed the importance of electronelectron Coulomb scattering [18].
The spinorbit (SO) coupling leads to a strong momentumdependent mixing of spin and orbitalmomentum eigenstates, so that scattering processes change spin and orbital angular momentum, and therefore contribute to spin relaxation accordingly [1921]. For electrons in twodimensional semiconductor heterostructures or QWs, the Rashba SO coupling due to structure inversion asymmetry and the Dresselhaus SO coupling due to bulk inversion asymmetry in the compounds cause electron spin relaxation and decoherence through spin precession of carriers with finite crystal momentum k in the effective kdependent crystal magnetic field of an inversionasymmetric material. Therefore, spin relaxation and decoherence studies in semiconductors have revealed important physics of SO coupling. Since carrier spin relaxation is related to several competing mechanisms and particularly different materials and structural designs, different SO coupling is involved to spin relaxation processes. Thus, the experimental investigation of spin relaxation and its dependence on temperature and carrier density have been found to vary widely between different samples. In this study, we have designed two GaAs/AlGaAs QWs with different structural symmetries. The spin relaxation time is measured to be much shorter for the asymmetrically designed GaAs/AlGaAs QW comparing with the symmetrical one, indicating the strong effect of Rashba SO coupling on spin relaxation. The comprehensive studies of temperature and carrier density dependence of spin relaxation time for both samples have revealed that electron spin relaxation in GaAs/AlGaAs QWs is governed mainly by DP mechanism in the entire temperature regime. The spin relaxation time exhibits nonmonotonic behavior for both temperature and photoexcited carrier density dependence, revealing the important role of nonmonotonic temperature and density dependence of electronelectron Coulomb scattering. Our experimental observations demonstrate good agreement with recently developed spin relaxation theory based on microscopic kinetic spin Bloch equation approach [69].
Experimental details
The samples used in our experiments were nmodulationdoped single GaAs/AlGaAs QW with well width of 10 nm grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (100)oriented semiinsulating GaAs substrates. As shown in Figure 1, one of the samples is designed to be symmetric with twoside symmetric Al_{0.3}Ga_{0.7}As barriers and δdoping concentration of 2 × 10^{10 }cm^{2}. The other sample is designed to be asymmetric with different aluminum components at two sides (Al_{0.3}Ga_{0.7}As for the upside barrier and Al_{0.25}Ga_{0.75}As for the downside barrier) and asymmetric doping concentration as well (the nominal upside nmodulation doping is 2 × 10^{11 }cm^{2 }and the downside doping is 2 × 10^{10 }cm^{2}). The rest layer structures and growth conditions are identical for two samples.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the symmetric (left) and asymmetric (right) GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well structures grown by MBE.
In our timeresolved magnetoKerr rotation measurement, a Ti:Sapphire laser system (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent Inc., USA) provided 150 fs pulses with repetition rate of 80 MHz. The pump beam with central wavelength ranging from 770 to 860 nm was incident normal to the sample, while probe beam was at an angle of about 30° to the surface normal. The polarization of the pump beam was adjusted to be circularly polarized and the probe beam was linearly polarized. The sample was mounted within a Janis closedcycle optical cryostat, which is located inbetween two poles of an electromagnet. After reflection from sample, the Kerr rotation signal was detected by a sensitive optical bridge and lockin amplifier. The photoluminescence (PL) measurements have been first performed at wide temperature range to check the sample's quality and identify the bandedge energies for the specially designed samples.
Results and discussion
Both samples have shown very good PL response up to room temperature as shown in Figure 2, indicating a good sample quality. The PL peak at 848 nm is related to the band edge of QW and the peak at 870 nm is related to the band edge of GaAs substrate. The band edgerelated PL peak for QW has blueshifted to 798 nm at 10 K as expected. The timeresolved Kerr rotation measurements are then performed at different temperatures and photoexcitation powers with excitation wavelength centered either at the resonant position of the band edge PL peak of QWs or well above it. The typical timeresolved Kerr rotation signals measured at 20, 200, and 250 K with an excitation wavelength of 798 nm and pumping electron densities of 1.15 × 10^{11 }cm^{2 }for the asymmetric GaAs QW have been presented in Figure 3a. The temperature dependence of electron spin relaxation times extracted from the exponential decay function fitting of timeresolved Kerr response for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QWs is shown in Figure 3b. The measured spin relaxation time for the symmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QW is in general longer than the asymmetric one at low temperature regime (< 100 K). This result is consistent with the wellestablished DP spin relaxation mechanism, in which the SO coupling plays an important role for electron spin relaxation. It is naturally expected that the Rashba SO coupling in the asymmetric sample should be stronger than the symmetric one, whereas the Dresselhaus SO coupling could be similar for two samples. The shorter spin relaxation time for the asymmetric QW is caused by much stronger inhomogeneous magnetic fluctuations resulting from stronger Rashba SO coupling than the symmetric QW. Meanwhile, electron spin relaxation times for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QWs have shown nonmonotonical dependence on temperature. Spin relaxation time increases first with increasing temperature, showing a peak value of 399 ps around 180 K, and then decreases with further increase in temperature for the asymmetric QW. The symmetric GaAs/Al_{0.3}Ga_{0.7}As QW shows the similar temperaturedependent spin relaxation time behavior, but with a maximum spin relaxation time of 592 ps observed around 60 K. The BAP mechanism, in which the spin relaxation is caused by spinflip via the electronhole exchange interaction, predicts that the spinrelaxation time decreases rapidly with increasing temperature in lowtemperature regime. However, the observed low temperature dependence of spin relaxation is in contrast to the BAP mechanism. Rather, the appearance of a peak in the temperaturedependent spin relaxation time for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs QW structures agrees well with the theoretical reexamination of spin dynamics in both QW and bulk intrinsic IIIV group semiconductors [69], in which BAP mechanism has been shown to be much less important than DP mechanism, even at low temperatures. The strengthening momentum scatterings at higher temperatures suppress the inhomogeneous broadening (the random spin precession), and tend to prolong the spin relaxation time with DP mechanism, in which spin relaxation time is inversely proportional to the momentum scattering time τ_{p }The appearance of the peaks in Figure 3b originates from the DP mechanism controlled by electronelectron Coulomb scattering. In addition, as discussed in references [69], electronelectron Coulomb scattering rate is a nonmonotonic function of temperature and electron density with a minimum of corresponding to the crossover from the degenerate limit to the nondegenerate one at Fermi temperature T_{F }= E_{F}/K_{B }[69].
Figure 2. The PL response measured at room temperature for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QWs.
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of electron spin relaxation times measured at excitation wavelength of 798 nm and optically pumped electron densities of 1.15 × 10^{11 }cm^{2}. (a) The timeresolved Kerr rotation signals measured at 20, 200, and 250 K for the asymmetric GaAs QW. (b) Temperature dependence of electron spin relaxation times measured for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs QW samples. The solid lines are drawn to guide eyes.
When temperature further increases, electronphonon scattering will then strengthen and become comparable to electronelectron scattering, eventually dominate the spin relaxation process; thus, spin relaxation time decreases with further rising temperatures. As a result, spin relaxation time shows a maximum. Considering the total electron density, n_{e }is the sum of optically excited carrier density and doping density (assuming fully ionized Si doping), the peak of temperaturedependent spin relaxation time is calculated to appear at about 59 and 140 K for the symmetric and asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QW samples under optically pumped electron density of 1.15 × 10^{11 }cm^{2}, respectively. This, however, only agrees with the observed peak position for the symmetric sample. The inconsistence for the asymmetric sample may result from the uncertainty of the actual electron density.
The typical timeresolved Kerr rotation signals measured at 10 K with the excitation wavelength of 798 nm at three different pumping electron densities for the asymmetric GaAs QW have been presented in Figure 4a. The optically pumped electron density dependence of electron spin relaxation times measured at 10 K with the excitation wavelength of 798 nm for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QWs is shown in Figure 4b. Again, the electron spin relaxation times for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs QWs have shown nonmonotonic dependence on excitation density with a peak appearing at electron density of n_{c }= 1.51.7 × 10^{11}cm^{2 }The nonmonotonic density dependence of spin relaxation time mainly results from electronelectron Coulomb scatterings contribution at low temperature. It is known that, in the strong scattering regime, the spin relaxation time can be expressed as [69], where 〈Ω_{⊥}^{2}〉 is the average square of the component for precession vector in the plane perpendicular to i, and is the momentum scattering time. In the nondegenerate (low density) regime, the electronelectron scattering increases with electron density, whereas the inhomogeneous broadening barely changes since the distribution function is close to the Boltzmann distribution. The spin relaxation is thus governed by strengthening electronelectron scattering with increasing carrier density. Therefore, spin relaxation time increases with increasing excitation density. In degenerate (high density) regime, both and the inhomogeneous broadening 〈Ω_{⊥}^{2}〉 increase with electron density, leading to the decreased spin relaxation time with carrier density. The similar nonmonotonicdependent behavior on excitation density for spin relaxation time has also been experimentally observed for intrinsic GaAs QW [22] and bulk CdTe crystal [23,24] at room temperature. DP mechanism has been revealed to dominate the electron spin relaxation at room temperature. The doping densitydependent electron spin relaxation investigation at low temperature for ntype bulk GaAs has also observed a peak in spindephasing times [25], and this peak has been attributed to the influence of electron screening and scattering on the spin dynamics of the excited electrons [25,26]. The high temperature regime (280400 K) investigation of spin relaxation time as a function of carrier density for bulk GaAs also confirmed the dominance of DP and electron opticalphonon scattering mechanism [27]. Our experimental investigations for temperature and carrier densitydependent electron spin dynamics give further demonstration of DP mechanismgoverned spin relaxation process in nmodulationdoped GaAs QWs.
Figure 4. Photoexcited carrier density dependence of electron spin relaxation times measured at 10 K with excitation wavelength of 798 nm. (a) The typical timeresolved Kerr rotation signals measured at three different pumping electron densities for the asymmetric GaAs QW. (b) Photoexcited carrier density dependence of electron spin relaxation times measured for both symmetric and asymmetric GaAs QW samples. The solid lines are drawn to guide eyes.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the temperature and carrier densitydependent studies of spin relaxation time for modulationdoped GaAs/AlGaAs QWs have demonstrated a good agreement with recently developed spin relaxation theory based on microscopic kinetic spin Bloch equation approach. The spin relaxation time is measured to be much longer for the symmetrically designed GaAs QW comparing with the asymmetrical one, indicating the strong influence of Rashba SO coupling on spin relaxation. DP mechanism has been revealed to dominate spin relaxation for nmodulationdoped GaAs QWs in the entire temperature regime. Our experimental results provide further fundamental understanding of spin dynamics in modulationdoped heterostructures toward potential semiconductor spintronics application based on GaAs/AlGaAs material systems.
Abbreviations
BAP: BirAranovPikus; DP: D'yakonovPerel; PL: photoluminescence; QW: quantum wells; SO: spinorbit; 2DEG: twodimensional electron gas.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
LFH carried out the time resolved Kerr rotation measurements for all samples and performed the calculation and analysis. YGZ helped out the experimental setup and instructions. XHZ conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination as well as manuscript drafting. P H Tan performed the PL measurement. HQN and ZCN grew GaAs QW samples with high quality by molecular beam epitaxy method. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant Nos. 2011CB922200 and 2007CB924904; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 10974195 and 10734060.
References

Dyakonov MI: Spin Physics in Semiconductors. Berlin: SpringerVerlag; 2008.

Lai TS, Liu XD, Xu HH, Jiao ZX, Wen JH, Lin WZ: Temperature dependence of electronspin coherence in intrinsic bulk GaAs.
Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88:192106. Publisher Full Text

Amo A, Viña L, Lugli P, Tejedor C, Toropov AI, Zhuravlev KS: Pauli blockade of the electron spin flip in bulk GaAs.
Phys Rev B 2007, 75:085202. Publisher Full Text

Wagner J, Schneider H, Richards D, Fischer A, Ploog K: Observation of extremely long electronspinrelaxation times in ptype deltadoped GaAs/Al_{x}Ga_{1x}As double heterostructures.
Phys Rev B 1993, 47:4786. Publisher Full Text

Gotoh H, Ando H, Sogawa T, Kamada H, Kagawa T, Iwamura H: Effect of electronhole interaction on electron spin relaxation in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells at room temperature.
J Appl Phys 2000, 87:3394. Publisher Full Text

Zhou J, Wu MW: Spin relaxation due to the BirAronovPikus mechanism in intrinsic and ptype GaAs quantum wells from a fully microscopic approach.
Phys Rev B 2008, 77:075318. Publisher Full Text

Jiang JH, Wu MW: Electronspin relaxation in bulk IIIV semiconductors from a fully microscopic kinetic spin Bloch equation approach.
Phys Rev B 2009, 79:125206. Publisher Full Text

Jiang JH, Cheng JL, Wu MW: Spin relaxation in ntype GaAs quantum wells from a fully microscopic approach.
Phys Rev B 2007, 75:045305. Publisher Full Text

Wu MW, Jiang JH, Weng MQ: Spin dynamics in semiconductors.
Phys Rep 2010, 493:61. Publisher Full Text

Malinowski A, Britton RS, Grevatt T, Harley RT, Ritchie DA, Simmons MY: Spin relaxation in GaAs/Al_{x}Ga_{1x}As quantum wells.
Phys Rev B 2000, 62:13034. Publisher Full Text

Ohno Y, Terauchi R, Adachi T, Matsukura F, Ohno H: Spin relaxation in GaAs (110) quantum wells.
Phys Rev Lett 1999, 83:4196. Publisher Full Text

Britton RS, Grevatt T, Malinowski A, Harley RT, Perozzo P, Cameron AR, Miller A: Room temperature spin relaxation in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wells.
Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73:2140. Publisher Full Text

Leyland WJH, Harley RT, Henini M, Shields AJ, Farrer I, Ritchie DA: Oscillatory DyakonovPerel spin dynamics in twodimensional electron gases.
Phys Rev B 2007, 76:195305. Publisher Full Text

Leyland WJH, John GH, Harley RT, Glazov MM, Ivchenko EL, Ritchie DA, Farrer I, Shields AJ, Henini M: Enhanced spinrelaxation time due to electronelectron scattering in semiconductor quantum wells.
Phys Rev B 2007, 75:165309. Publisher Full Text

Wu MW, Ning CZ: A novel mechanism for spin dephasing due to spinconserving scatterings.
Eur Phys J B 2000, 18:373. Publisher Full Text

Wu MW, Metiu H: Kinetics of spin coherence of electrons in an undoped semiconductor quantum well.
Phys Rev B 2000, 61:2945. Publisher Full Text

Wu MW: Spin dephasing induced by inhomogeneous broadening in D'yakonovPerel' effect in a ndoped GaAs quantum well.
J Phys Soc Jpn 2001, 70:2195. Publisher Full Text

Ruan XZ, Luo HH, Yang J, Xu ZY, Umansky V: Effect of electronelectron scattering on spin dephasing in a highmobility lowdensity twodimensional electron gas.
Phys Rev B 2008, 77:193307. Publisher Full Text

Sham LJ: Spin relaxation in semiconductor quantum wells.
J Phys Condens Matter 1993, 5:A51. Publisher Full Text

Averkiev NS, Golub LE, Willander M: Spin relaxation anisotropy in twodimensional semiconductor systems.
J Phys Condens Matter 2002, 14:R271. Publisher Full Text

Pikus GE, Titkov AN: Optical Orientation. Edited by Meier F, Zakharchenya BP. Amsterdam: NorthHolland; 1984:73131.

Teng LH, Zhang P, Lai TS, Wu MW: Density dependence of spin relaxation in GaAs quantum well at room temperature.
EuroPhys Lett 2008, 84:27006. Publisher Full Text

Ma H, Jin ZM, Ma GH, Liu WM, Tang SH: Photon energy and carrier density dependence of spin dynamics in bulk CdTe crystal at room temperature.
Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94:241112. Publisher Full Text

Jiang JH, Wu MW: Comment on "Photon energy and carrier density dependence of spin dynamics in bulk CdTe crystal at room temperature".
Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96:136101. Publisher Full Text

Krauß M, Schneider HC, Bratschitsch R, Chen Z, Cundiff ST: Ultrafast spin dynamics in optically excited bulk GaAs at low temperatures.

Shen K: A Peak in Density Dependence of Electron Spin Relaxation Time in nType Bulk GaAs in the Metallic Regime.
Chin Phys Lett 2009, 26:067201. Publisher Full Text

Oertel S, Hübner J, Oestreich M: High temperature electron spin relaxation in bulk GaAs.
Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93:132112. Publisher Full Text