Spinel zinc manganese oxide (ZnMn2O4) nanorods were successfully prepared using the previously synthesized α-MnO2 nanorods by a hydrothermal method as template. The nanorods were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, UV-Vis absorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, surface photovoltage spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The ZnMn2O4 nanorods in well-formed crystallinity and phase purity appeared with the width in 50-100 nm and the length in 1.5-2 μm. They exhibited strong absorption below 500 nm with the threshold edges around 700 nm. A significant photovoltage response in the region below 400 nm could be observed for the nanorods calcined at 650 and 800°C.
Spinel is an important class of mixed-metal oxides, which has the general chemical composition of AB2O4. In recent years, mixed transition-metal oxides with spinel structure have attracted much attention, owing to their various properties such as photocatalytic [1-4], electrochemical performance , magnetic [6,7] properties, or being used as lithium ion batteries . Mn-doped ZnO has also aroused lots of interest because it had been predicted to be a room-temperature diluted magnetic semiconductor , which was later verified by experiments. Therefore, the Mn-Zn-O ternary systems belong to a class of interesting and useful materials in terms of their electrical and magnetic properties.
As one of the important mixed transition-metal oxides with spinel structure, ZnMn2O4 is a promising functional material and has become the focus of various researches owing to its potential applications. ZnMn2O4 could be used for the negative temperature coefficient thermistors on account of their unique electrical properties . Ferrari and the coworkers studied the catalytic activity of zinc manganite for the reduction of NO by several types of hydrocarbons [4,11]. Those authors suggested that ZnMn2O4 was an efficient catalyst for the reduction of NO to N2, and, in all cases, its best selectivity to N2 and CO2 was at almost the maximum conversion temperature.
The physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials would be strongly affected by their particle sizes and morphologies . At present, a tremendous amount of comprehensive investigations are under way into the unique applications of one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures involving nanorods, nanotubes, nanowires, and nanobelts because they provide a great opportunity to investigate the dependence of optical/electrical properties, thermal transport, and mechanical performance on the nano-scaled dimensionality and size [13,14]. 1D nanomaterials, especially nanorods have displayed enhanced performances in many fields such as catalysts , sensors , solar cells , and so on.
ZnMn2O4 particles could be prepared earlier by various methods, such as solid-state reaction [17,18], sol-gel , co-precipitation method , and hydrothermal method [20,21]. For instance, Bessekhouad and Trari  prepared spinel ZnMn2O4 powder by solid-state reaction under high temperature. Zhang et al.  fabricated ZnMn2O4 nanoparticles by a hydrothermal method expending 48 h. Fan et al.  successfully synthesized 1D single-crystalline spinel MFe2O4 nanotubes/nanorings by thermal transformation process. In this study, we prepare the ZnMn2O4 nanorods successfully using the α-MnO2 nanorods as templates. The ZnMn2O4 nanorods obtained thus are well characterized, demonstrating their morphology, optical, and photoelectric properties.
All chemicals used in this study were analytic-grade reagents and used without further purification. At first, α-MnO2 nanorods were prepared by a hydrothermal approach. In a typical synthesis procedure, 0.8686 g KMnO4 and 1.8 mL concentrated HCl (37 wt%) were added to 100 mL deionized water to form the precursor solution, which was then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave with a capacity of 120 mL. The autoclave was sealed and hydrothermally treated at 140°C for 12 h. After the autoclave was cooled down to room temperature naturally, the black precipitates were collected by centrifugation and washed with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol several times to remove possible impurities or excess ions. The as-prepared sample was then dried in air overnight.
To obtain ZnMn2O4 nanorods, the prepared α-MnO2 nanorods (0.0174 g) were placed in 20 mL distilled water at room temperature to form a mixed solution by constant stirring. A Zn(NO3)2 solution (2.5 mL, 0.1 M) was then added to the solution, which was continually stirred for 5 min. Then NaOH solution (40 mL, 0.1 M) was directly added to the above solution dropwise, and the resulting mixture was maintained for 30 min under continuous stirring. The base-treated products were washed with distilled water and anhydrous ethanol several times. Next, the products were all calcined at 500, 550, 600, 650, and 800°C for 2 h in air.
The crystal structures and microstructures of the products were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (D/MAX-2400). The chemical composition of the samples was crosschecked by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS, JSM-5600LV). The SEM (Quanta 200 FEG), transition electron microscopy (TEM)/high-resolution transition electron microscopy (HRTEM) (JEOL JEM-2000EX), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED, Tecnai G220) were employed to observe the samples morphology. UV-Vis spectrophotometer (JASCO, UV-550) and a home-built surface photovoltage (SPV) measurement system based on a lock-in amplifier (Stanford, SR830) were employed to test the optical and photoelectric properties. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5600) was employed to reveal the surface chemical composition of the products. The chemical compositions of the different products were determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, VERTEX 70).
Results and discussion
XRD patterns of the calcined samples
The crystallinities and phase purities of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined were examined by powder XRD. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the samples after calcination at different temperatures and as per the standard data card about the ZnMn2O4. After calcination at 650°C, all the XRD peaks of the calcined samples could be indexed to cubic ZnMn2O4 with spinel structure (JCPDS file No.24-1133), where the diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 29.3°, 33.03°, 36.3°, 59.01°, 60.77°, and 65.1° are ascribed to the reflection of (112), (103), (211), (321), (224), and (400) planes of the spinel ZnMn2O4, respectively. No peaks from other phases are detected, indicating high purity of the products. However, in the products which were calcined at 500°C, the diffraction peaks of α-MnO2 and ZnO could still be seen clearly, implying that the precursor was not converted into spinel ZnMn2O4 completely even at such a calcination temperature. As for the sample treated at 800°C, two peaks of α-MnO2 preferential growth along (110) and (220) crystal faces at the surface of ZnMn2O4 nanorods were detected again because of partial decomposition of ZnMn2O4. Meanwhile, the peaks of α-MnO2 and ZnO could also be seen unambiguously when the precursors were calcined at 550 and 600°C (see Figure S1 in Additional file 1). These phenomena indicate that the formation of ZnMn2O4 began at the calcination temperature of about 650°C. On increasing the calcination temperature from 500 to 800°C, the peak widths of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods become narrower, and the relative intensities of the characteristic peaks increase gradually, which implies that the spinel ZnMn2O4 crystallites were growing and transforming from the disordered to a more ordered structure .
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods at different calcined temperatures and as per the standard card about ZnMn2O4 (JCPDS file No.24-1133). Asterisks, α-MnO2; inverted triangle, ZnO; filled circle, ZnMn2O4.
SEM images and elemental analysis of the nanorods
The general morphology of these nanorods was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figure 2a displays an overview image of the α-MnO2 nanorods. After coating Zn(OH)2 onto the α-MnO2 nanorods, the precursor of ZnMn2O4 nanorods is obtained. The SEM images in Figure 2b show that the morphology does not change with the rod width in the range of 50-100 nm and the length in the range of 1.5-2 μm. The morphology of the ZnMn2O4 obtained by calcination at 650°C of the precursor is shown in Figure 2c. It also displays a similar morphology to the MnO2 nanorods. The EDS characterization at the same position was carried out. As shown in Figure 2d, it is clear that the nanorods consist of Zn, Mn, and O and the elemental ratio of Zn to Mn is determined to be about 1:2.
Figure 2. The SEM images of different samples: (a) α-MnO2 nanorods; (b) α-MnO2/Zn(OH)2 nanorods; (c) the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 650°C; and (d) EDS spectrum of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 650°C.
TEM and HRTEM images of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods
The TEM and HRTEM were employed to further investigate the morphology of these nanocrystalline ZnMn2O4 superstructures calcined at 650°C (Figure 3). TEM image confirms the nanocrystalline feature of the ZnMn2O4 particles (Figure 3a,b), in which the individual rod width is in the range of 50-100 nm. Figure 3c shows the HRTEM image of ZnMn2O4 nanorods. The inset in Figure 3c is the enlargement of the selected area, indicating the good crystallization of the nanoparticles. The fringes of d = 0.246 nm match that of the (211) crystallographic plane of ZnMn2O4, which is the strongest crystallographic plane, corresponding to the distance between (211) crystal planes of the spinel phase of zinc manganese oxide (JCPDS file No. 24-1133). Figure 3d is the SAED image of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods, which shows the (211), (224), and (321) crystal planes clearly.
Figure 3. Characterization of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 650°C: (a,b) TEM images; (c) HRTEM image. Inset: the enlargement of the marked square; and (d) SAED pattern.
The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods
The optical property of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods can be observed by the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Figure 4a shows the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at different temperatures. All the samples have strong absorption between 300 and 500 nm, and the absorption edges of these samples are all around 700 nm. The optical band gaps could be determined from the curves of (αhυ)n versus hυ, α being the optical absorption coefficient. The exponent n equals 1/2 for indirectly allowed and 2 for directly allowed transitions (Figure 4). Figure 4b is the (αhυ)2-hν curves for the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at different temperatures. The optical band gaps are calculated as 1.2, 1.34, and 1.45 eV for the samples calcined at 500, 650 and 800°C, respectively. No linear relation was found for n = 1/2, suggesting that the prepared ZnMn2O4 may be a semiconductor allowing direct transitions at these energy levels .
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra and plots for band gaps determination. (a) The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 500, 650, and 800°C, respectively; (b) plots of (αhυ)2 versus photon energy of ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 500, 650, and 800°C, respectively.
XPS spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods
In ZnMn2O4, Mn and Zn atoms exist in the samples with more than one chemical state (A-sites or B-sites), bringing about several contributions with different binding energies in the XPS. Therefore, XPS was employed to reveal the surface chemical compositions of the nanocrystalline ZnMn2O4 superstructures obtained from the calcinations of the precursor at 650°C (Figure 5). Figure 5a shows the survey spectra of the nanocrystalline ZnMn2O4. Elements of Zn, Mn, O, and adventitious C existed in the ZnMn2O4. The carbonate species adsorbed on the surface have appeared from the calibration for XPS instrument itself. As shown in the spectrum in Figure 5b, the peaks of 654.4 and 642.4 eV can be attributed to Mn 2p1/2 and Mn 2p3/2, respectively. Figure 5c shows the Zn 2p peaks at binding energies of 1044.8 and 1021.6 eV. This reveals the oxidation state of Mn3+ in the sample. Meanwhile, O 1s spectra of ZnMn2O4 were also recorded (Figure 5d). The broad peak of O 1s can be fitted by two peaks at binding energies of 531.8 and 530.2 eV. The stronger peak at 530.2 eV is ascribed to the characteristics of oxygen in metal oxide, and the other peak at around 531.8 eV suggests the presence of other components, such as OH, H2O, and carbonate species adsorbed on the surface. In addition, XPS analysis confirms that the ratio of Zn to Mn in the sample is very close to 1:2, which is in good agreement with the formula of ZnMn2O4.
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods obtained by calcining the precursor at 650°C: (a) survey of the sample; (b) Mn 2p; (c) Zn 2p; and (d) O 1s.
SPV spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods
SPV method, a well-established technique for the characterization of photoelectric materials, can be used to investigate their photoelectric properties . Figure 6 presents the obtained SPV amplitude spectra for the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 500, 650, and 800°C and the schematic of the AC photovoltaic cells. As the calcined temperature goes on increasing, the SPV response intensities become stronger and stronger because the spinel ZnMn2O4 nanorods become well ordered and the crystallinities enhance. For the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 650 and 800°C, a significant SPV response band could be observed in the region 300-400 nm, which is directly related to the free charge carriers induced by the incident light. However, only a very small response can be observed about the product calcined at 500°C because of poor crystallinity of ZnMn2O4 as well as the existence of α-MnO2, which almost cannot produce SPV response.
Figure 6. AC SPV amplitude spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 500, 650, and 800°C. Inset: schematic of the AC photovoltaic cells.
IR spectra of the ZnMn2O4 nanorods
Infrared (IR) spectroscopy could provide plentiful information on the molecular structure and chemical bonding, which enables the characterization and identification of chemical species. Herein, we employed IR spectroscopy to comparatively analyze and identify the material compositions of different products. The IR spectra of the prepared samples treated at 500, 650, and 800°C are presented in Figure 7. The spectrum of the precursor calcined at 500°C shows a band at 531 cm-1, which is attributed to the Mn-O vibrations of MnO2. The bands belonging to ZnMn2O4 nanorods are considerably weak, probably because of the co-existence of α-MnO2 and ZnO. When the temperature reached 650°C, a strong band at 516 cm-1 and a weak one at 623 cm-1 related to spinel ZnMn2O4 appear. Upon increasing the treatment temperature to 800°C, these bands become more intense and shift to higher wavenumbers, from 516 to 547 cm-1 and from 623 to 642 cm-1, which reveals the formed spinel nanorods have achieved an improved crystallinity .
Figure 7. FTIR spectra for the ZnMn2O4 nanorods calcined at 500, 650, and 800°C, respectively.
In summary, one-dimensional spinel ZnMn2O4 nanorods were successfully fabricated using the α-MnO2 nanorods as template. The ZnMn2O4 nanorods mainly grew along the (211) crystalline plane with the width in 50-100 nm and the length in 1.5-2 μm. The optical band gap energies of the nanorods calcined at 500°C, 650°C, and 800°C were respectively estimated to be 1.2, 1.34, and 1.45 eV. As the calcination temperature increased, they presented with much improved crystallinity and photoelectric response. The simple method for preparing the ZnMn2O4 nanorods reported here could also be utilized to fabricate other manganates.
EDS: energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope; FTIR: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; HRTEM: high-resolution transition electron microscopy; SAEDL: selected area electron diffraction; SPV: surface photovoltage; TEM: transition electron microscopy; XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; XRD: X-ray diffraction.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
PZ conceived of the study, carried out the experiment process, did the most parts' characterizations, and drafted the manuscript. XYL conceived of the study, guided the research, and helped in drafting the manuscript. QDZ and SML participated in research coordination, draft revision, and helped in drafting the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was supported financially by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 20877013, NSFC-RGC 21061160495), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2007AA061402), the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2007CB613306), and the Excellent Talents Program of Liaoning Provincial University (LR2010090).
Chem Commun 2009, 24:3588-3590. Publisher Full Text
J Phys Chem C 2009, 113:14083-14087. Publisher Full Text
Appl Catal B Environ 2005, 57:153-165. Publisher Full Text
J Power Sources 2009, 192:693-697. Publisher Full Text
Phys Rev B 1996, 54:9288-9296. Publisher Full Text
Electrochem Commun 2008, 10:1117-1120. Publisher Full Text
Solid State Ionics 2000, 128:233-242. Publisher Full Text
Appl Catal B Environ 2002, 36:251-260. Publisher Full Text
Prog Mater Sci 2010, 55:563-627. Publisher Full Text
Adv Mater 2003, 15:353-389. Publisher Full Text
Adv Mater 2000, 12:1295-1298. Publisher Full Text
Appl Catal B Environ 2010, 100:173-178. Publisher Full Text
J Solid State Chem 2007, 180:2459-2464. Publisher Full Text
Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27:357-362. Publisher Full Text
Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95:152106-152106. Publisher Full Text
J Power Sources 2009, 194:1089-1093. Publisher Full Text
J Phys Chem Solids 2007, 68:1583-1590. Publisher Full Text
Fan HM, Yi JB, Yang Y, Kho KW, Tan HR, Shen ZX, Ding J, Sun XW, Olivo MC, Feng YP: Single-crystalline MFe2O4 nanotubes/nanorings synthesized by thermal transformation process for biological applications.
Solid State Ionics 2010, 181:1445-1450. Publisher Full Text
Surf Sci Rep 1999, 37:1-206. Publisher Full Text
J Alloys Compd 2010, 506:541-547. Publisher Full Text