Table 2 |
||||||||
|
Summary of the results of MD simulations in this study. |
||||||||
|
Chirality, case |
Box |
LNH |
L |
λ |
αst |
αtr |
τd |
mL/2 |
|
(nm3) |
(nm) |
(nm) |
W·m-2·K-1 |
W·m-2·K-1 |
W·m-2·K-1 |
(ps) |
||
|
|
||||||||
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (vac) |
12 × 12 × 12 |
1.5 |
5.5 |
67 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BwAD-LJ (vac) |
12 × 12 × 12 |
1.5 |
5.5 |
64 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BAD (vac) |
12 × 12 × 12 |
1.5 |
5.5 |
65 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BA (vac) |
12 × 12 × 12 |
1.5 |
5.5 |
49 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BwA (vac) |
12 × 12 × 12 |
1.5 |
5.5 |
48.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (vac) |
20 × 20 × 20 |
2 |
10 |
96.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (vac) |
105 × 105 × 105 |
25 |
25 |
216.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (sol) |
2.5 × 2.5 × 14 |
2 |
10 |
- |
5.18 × 107 |
- |
- |
0.28 |
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (sol) |
4 × 4 × 14 |
2 |
10 |
- |
5.18 × 107 |
- |
- |
0.28 |
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (sol) |
4 × 4 × 14 |
0 |
14 |
- |
- |
1.70 × 107 |
33 |
- |
|
(5, 5), BAD-LJ (sol) |
5 × 5 × 5 |
0 |
3.7 |
- |
- |
1.37 × 107 |
41 |
- |
|
(15, 0), BAD-LJ (sol) |
5 × 5 × 5 |
0 |
4.7 |
- |
- |
1.60 × 107 |
35 |
- |
|
(15, 0), BAD-LJ (sol) |
5 × 5 × 5 |
0 |
3.8 |
- |
- |
1.43 × 107 |
39 |
- |
|
(3, 3), BAD-LJ (sol) |
5 × 5 × 5 |
0 |
3.7 |
- |
- |
8.90 × 106 |
63 |
- |
|
|
||||||||
|
SW-CNTs with chirality (3, 3), (5, 5), and (15, 0) are considered, and several combinations
of interaction potentials are tested. In the first column, B, A, D, and LJ stand for
bond stretching, angular, dihedrals, and Lennard-Jones potentials, respectively, while
Bw denotes bond stretching with a smaller force constant |
||||||||
|
Chiavazzo and Asinari Nanoscale Research Letters 2011 6:249 doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-249 |
||||||||