Table 1 |
|||||
|
Effective thermal conductivity of simulated nanofluids |
|||||
|
Nanofluid Volume fraction |
0.005 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
|
|
|||||
|
Cu(100 nm)/DIW |
1.123 |
1.275 |
1.560 |
||
|
Cu(100 nm)/EG |
1.135 |
1.191 |
1.313 |
||
|
Cu(50 nm)/EG |
1.220 |
1.273 |
1.362 |
||
|
Al2O3(80 nm)/DIW |
1.045 |
1.082 |
1.150 |
||
|
Al2O3(80 nm)/EG |
1.103 |
1.174 |
1.230 |
||
|
Al2O3(50 nm)/EG |
1.182 |
1.260 |
1.284 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
Effective thermal conductivity of all simulated nanofluids is tabulated and shown here (computed values of effective thermal conductivity for simulations where the two-way temperature coupling and van der Waals force are neglected are not tabulated here). |
|||||
|
Kondaraju and Lee Nanoscale Research Letters 2011 6:239 doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-239 |
|||||