We investigate theoretically the ground state and transport property of electrons in interacting quantum wires (QWs) oriented along different crystallographic directions in (001) and (110) planes in the presence of the Rashba spinorbit interaction (RSOI) and Dresselhaus SOI (DSOI). The electron ground state can cross over different phases, e.g., spin density wave, charge density wave, singlet superconductivity, and metamagnetism, by changing the strengths of the SOIs and the crystallographic orientation of the QW. The interplay between the SOIs and Coulomb interaction leads to the anisotropic dc transport property of QW which provides us a possible way to detect the strengths of the RSOI and DSOI.
PACS numbers: 73.63.Nm, 71.10.Pm, 73.23.b, 71.70.Ej
Introduction
Allelectrical manipulation of spin degree of freedom is one of the central issues and the ultimate goal of spintronics field. The spinorbit interaction (SOI) is a manifestation of special relativity. An electric field in the laboratory frame can transform into an effective magnetic field in the moving frame of electron and consequently leads to electron spin splitting. Therefore, the SOI provides us an efficient way to control electron spin electrically and has attracted tremendous interest because of its potential application in allelectrical spintronic devices [1,2]. The spin degeneracy can be lifted by applying magnetic field to break the timereversal symmetry and/or by applying electric fields to break the spatial inversion symmetry. However, the latter could be more easily realized in spintronics devices. In semiconductors the spatial inversion symmetry can be broken by the structural inversion asymmetry and bulk crystal inversion asymmetry, named, Rashba SOI (RSOI) and Dresselhaus SOI (DSOI), respectively [3,4]. Usually, the RSOI in semiconductor quantum well is much stronger than that of DSOI, and therefore, most of the previous theoretical and experimental studies focused on the RSOI and its consequence on the spin transport properties in twodimensional electron gas (2DEG) [57]. In thin quantum wells, the strength of the DSOI is comparable to that of the RSOI since the strength of the DSOI depends significantly on the thickness of quantum wells. The interplay between the RSOI and DSOI leads to interesting phenomena in 2DEG, e.g., the anisotropic photogalvanic effect [8], and the persistent spin helix [9]. However, the interplay between the RSOI and DSOI in quantum wires (QWs) remains relatively unexplored.
Very recently, the anisotropic behavior of transport property in semiconductor QWs was proposed to detect the relative strength between the RSOI and DSOI in a quasionedimensional (Q1D) semiconductor QW system [10,11]. However, the effect of the Coulomb interaction on the transport property is not addressed. Since the Coulomb interaction becomes very strong in Q1 D electron systems where electrons are strongly correlated, and therefore the conventional Fermi liquid theory breaks down. There are no fermionic quasiparticle in Q1 D electron gas, and the elementary excitations are bosonic collective charge and spin fluctuations with different propagating velocities. The Luttinger liquid (LL) theory [12] is of fundamental importance because it is one of a very few strongly correlated nonFermi liquid systems that can be solved analytically. The LL displays very unique properties, e.g., the spin and charge separation and the powerlaw behavior of the correlation functions. The unique behavior was observed experimentally in many Q1 D systems, for instance, narrow QW formed in semiconductor heterostructures [13], carbon nanotube [14], graphene nanoribbon [15], as well as the edge states of the fractional Quantum Hall liquid [16]. Recent studies have found that the RSOI would lead to the mixing between the spin and charge excitations in QW with the RSOI alone [1720]. It is interesting to study the interplay between the RSOI and DSOI on the ground state and transport property of QWs in the presence of the Coulomb interaction.
In this study, based on the LL theory, we study the effect of the interplay between the Coulomb interaction and SOIs on the electron ground state and transport property of an interacting QW oriented along different crystallographic directions in different planes. The electron ground state can display the transitions among the different phases, e.g., the spin density wave (SDW), charge density wave (CDW), singlet superconductivity (SS), and metamagnetism (MM), by tuning the crystallographic plane and orientation of the QW, the strengths of SOIs and the Coulomb interaction. The anisotropy of the dc conductivity of interacting QW is induced by the interplay between the Coulomb interaction and SOIs, which could be used for detecting the strengths of the RSOI and DSOI.
Theory
The Q1 D QW system is shown schematically in Figure 1a where electrons are confined laterally and move freely along the xaxis. The RSOI can be generated in the region below the top gate, and the DSOI always exists in the conventional zincblende semiconductors lacking the spatial inversion symmetry, e.g., GaAs, InAs, and InSb. The Hamiltonian of noninteracting electrons in a Q1 D QW oriented along different crystallographic directions in (001) plane is [11]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of semiconductor QW, the constant energy surfaces and the spin orientations of 2DEG. (a) Schematic diagram of semiconductor QW which oriented along the crystallographic direction θ with respect to [100] axis in the crystallographic planes (001), (110), and (111). n is the unit vector along the normal direction of the crystallographic plane. (b) The constant energy surfaces and the spin orientations of 2DEG in (001), (110), and (111) planes.
where θ is the angle between the orientation of the QW and the [100] axis, m* is the electron effective mass, σ_{i }(i = x, y, z) are the Pauli matrices, and α and β are the strengths of the RSOI and DSOI, respectively. The linearized noninteracting electron Hamiltonian of the QW with both RSOI and DSOI is [17,20]
where the operators ψ_{γs}(γ = 1(L),1(R); s = 1(↓),1(↑)) annihilate spindown (↓) or spinup (↑) electrons near the left (L) and right (R) Fermi points, respectively. are the four different Fermi velocities, where v_{F }is the bare Fermi velocity of right and leftmoving noninteracting electrons, , usually δv ≪ v_{F}. Note that the RSOI and DSOI split the spinup and spindown subbands and make the electron Fermi velocities become orientation dependent. The total Hamiltonian of the system including the Coulomb interaction is H = H_{0 }+ H_{int}, where
The Umklapp scattering process is neglected because the Fermi energy in QWs formed in semiconductor heterostructure is far from the halffilled case, and the electronelectron backscattering can be negligible for a sufficiently long interacting region [17]. Using the bosonization technique [21], the Hamiltonian becomes
Where ϑ_{ρ }and ϑ_{σ }are the phase fields for the charge and spin degrees of freedom, respectively, and Π_{ρ }and Π_{σ }are the corresponding conjugate momenta. v_{ρ }and v_{σ }are the propagation velocities of the decoupled charge and spincollective modes in the absence of the SOIs (δv = 0), respectively.
For a QW embedded in (110) plane, the Hamiltonian of the noninteracting electrons reads [11]
where the parameters α, β, and θ are the same as in Equation (1). The dominant differences are (1) the Fermi velocity is different , where ; (2) the effective magnetic field induced by the DSOI is perpendicular to (110) plane, which could generate an outofplane spinpolarized current; and (3) the anisotropy is mainly determined by the DSOI. These differences would lead to the distinct anisotropic behavior of QWs embedded in (110) plane. For (111) plane, the DSOI shows the same formulism as the RSOI; the Hamiltonian is which does not contain any θdependent term, and therefore the anisotropic behavior disappear. This isotropic character can be easily seen from the constant energy surface (see Figure 1b). We will not discuss the (111) plane any more.
The correlation functions at zero temperature in an interacting QW in the presence of the SOIs behave as , and the exponents α_{i}'s are determined by [18]
Here
Where , and
are the propagation velocities of coupled collective modes that depend on the crystallographic orientation θ. From the above equations, one can see that the interplay between the RSOI and DSOI will lead to anisotropy, i.e., the dependence on the crystallographic direction. This is the dominant difference between this work and the previous study [18]. Interestingly, for a QW in (001) plane, the spin and charge excitations can be decoupled again when θ = 3π/4 and α = β, θ = π/4 and α = β, since the coupling between the spin and charge excitation disappear when δv = 0 (see the third term in Equation (4)).
Considering a pointlike densitydensity interaction for the electronelectron interaction [22,23], we have v_{ρ,σ }= v_{F}/K_{ρ,σ }and the parameter K_{ρ/σ }being defined as , where g = 2V(q = 0)/ħπv_{F }with V (q = 0) is the electronelectron interaction potential. We consider an infinitely long interacting QW, i.e., a homogenous interacting QW, driven by a timedependent electric field E(x, t), which could be realized by applying a microwave radiation. describes the effect of the ac electric field on the charge excitation. The total Hamiltonian becomes H = H_{0 }+ H_{int }+ H_{ac}. By minimizing the action functional of such a Q1 D system, we get the equation of motion and consequently obtain the nonlocal charge conductivity using the linear response theory:
Numerical results and discussions
First, we study how the interplay among the Coulomb interaction, the RSOI, and the DSOI affects the ground state of Q1 D electron gas. It is worth to note that if one does not assume any specific form for electronelectron interactions, then all four parameters v_{ρ}(σ) and K_{ρ}(σ) (or equivalently g_{2}, g_{2⊥}, g_{4 }and g_{4⊥}) are independent [18]. Figure 2 describes the phase diagram of Q1 D QW embedded in (001) plane as function of the strength of the Coulomb interaction K_{p }and crystallographic orientations θ for the different strengths of SOIs α and β when K_{σ }= 0.7. We should stress that the different phases are determined by which correlation function decays most slowly for x → ∞ when the other correlation functions become negligible. We define the phase by the dominant correlation function, e.g., CDW or SDW. Here the CDW and SDW are actually not the pure charge and spin fluctuations, but a mixed state of them induced by the SOIs. Interestingly, one can see that the ground state of the system displays a crossover between the CDW and SDW by tuning the crystallographic orientation for the fixed parameters, e.g., K_{ρ}, α, and β. Note that the ground state of Q1 D electron system in the presence of RSOI alone cannot be affected by tuning the crystallographic orientation [18]. We find that there are crossovers of the ground state of Q1 D electron gas between CDW and SDW when we tune the strengths of the Coulomb interaction and the SOIs. For a fixed strength of the DSOI, the CDW phase region will be squeezed and die away gradually, with increase in the strengths of the RSOI. The ground state of the system is always SDW at strong RSOI for the arbitrary orientation of the QW. On the contrary, as the strength of the RSOI decreases for a given strength of the DSOI, the CDW phase region expands, and the ground state of the system becomes the CDW eventually. When δv > δv_{σ}, i.e., in the region below the dotted line, the ground state is the socalled MM phase, which was earlier observed in the Q1 D systems, e.g., Ba_{3}Cu_{2}O_{4}Cl_{2 }[24], and attributed to the nextnearestneighbor coupling in the XXZ model [25]. By tuning the parameters properly, the ground state of the system exhibits the crossovers among the SDW, CDW, SS, and MM.
Figure 2. Phase diagram of the ground state of Q1 D electron gas in a QW embedded in (001) plane for v_{ρ }= 1.2v_{F}, v_{σ }= 0.8v_{F}, K_{σ }= 0.7 for different values of the strengths of the RSOI α and DSOI β (in units of ħv_{F}). θ is the crystallographic direction. The regions below the dotted lines (δv > δv_{σ}) indicate the MM phase.
The phase diagram of the ground state for the QW embedded in (110) plane is very different from that of the QW in (001) plane for the same parameters v_{ρ}, v_{σ }and K_{σ}. Tuning the strength of the RSOI at a fixed strength of the DSOI, the ground state can also transit from CDW to SDW, but in very narrow region in the K_{ρ } θ space (see Figure 3). This is because the anisotropy is weaker compared to that of the QW in (001) plane.
Figure 3. Phase diagram of the ground state of Q1 D electron gas in a QW embedded in (110) plane. The same as Figure 2, but for a QW embedded in (110) plane.
Next, we turn to study the transport property of electron in an interacting QW. In the dc case, Equation (9) shows that the charge conductivity of an infinitely long interacting QW for the different parameters g and δv. For the noninteracting QW structure, there is only single transverse mode, and thus no anisotropy of the dc conductivity can be found. This result can also be obtained from Equation (9) by taking g = 0, i.e., noninteracting case, ; we easily obtain σ_{ρ }= 2e^{2}/h. When the Coulomb interaction is included but without the SOIs, i.e., α = β = 0, we can obtain an isotropic conductivity σ_{ρ }= 2K_{ρ}e^{2}/h from Equation (9). The spin and charge excitations propagate independently at the velocities v_{ρ }and v_{σ }in this case. In the presence of both the Coulomb interaction and the SOIs, the SOIs mix the spin and charge excitations, leading to anisotropic velocities of the collective excitations u_{1 }and u_{2 }(see Equation 8), or equivalently the anisotropic interaction parameter , consequently resulting in the anisotropic conductivity . Therefore, the dc conductivity of the infinitely longinteracting QW depends sensitively on the crystallographic direction θ of the QW, i.e., the anisotropic transport behavior (see Figure 4). Interestingly, the dc conductivity oscillates with varying the angle θ with a periodicity π. With increasing the strengths of the DSOI and/or RSOI (see Figure 4a) or the strengths of the Coulomb interaction (see Figure 4b), the oscillation of the conductivity for the infinitely longinteracting QW becomes stronger. This is because the anisotropy of the interaction parameter depends on the anisotropic velocities of the mixed spin and charge excitations, which increases when the strengths of the SOIs or the Coulomb interaction increase.
Figure 4. The dc conductivity dependence of the angle θ. The dc conductivity (in units of e^{2}/h) of electron in an infinitely longinteracting QW as a function of the angle θ with a fixed strength of Coulomb interaction g = 0.4 (a) for (001) plane, (c) for (110) plane, where the solid line (red online) is for α = 0.2 and β = 0.4; the dashed line (green online) for α = 0.3 and β = 0.2; and the dotted line (blue online) for α = 0.2 and β = 0.2; (b, d) is the same as (a, c), but with fixed SOI strengths α = 0.2 and β = 0.2 for different strengths of Coulomb interaction. (b) is for (001) plane and (d) for (110) plane, where the dotted line (blue online) corresponds to g = 0.4; the dashed line (green online) to g = 0.6; and the solid line (red online) to g = 0.
For an interacting QWs embedded in (110) plane, the anisotropy of the dc conductivity becomes different (see Figure 4c,d): (1) The RSOI becomes less important for the anisotropy of the dc conductivity comparing with that in (001) plane, the increase of the strength of RSOI only affects the anisotropy slightly (see the dashed green line and dotted blue line in Figure 4c), since the anisotropy is mainly determined by the DSOI. This can be understood from the formulism of the Fermi velocities , where . It is noted that for (001) plane, the anisotropy of dc conductivity will disappear with the RSOI or DSOI alone, while for (110) plane, the anisotropy will disappear only when the DSOI is absent, which can be understood from the expression of δv. (2) The effect of the Coulomb interaction on the anisotropy of dc conductivity is weakened significantly when compared to that in (001) plane (see Figure 4b,d).
Finally, we discuss how to detect the relative strength of the SOIs utilizing the anisotropic dc conductivity. We consider a QW embedded in (001) plane. One can tune the strength of RSOI by adjusting the gate voltage. For a QW oriented along the axis, i.e., θ = 3π/4 When α = β the dc conductivity becomes σ_{ρ }= 2K_{ρ}e^{2}/h, where the Coulomb interaction parameter K_{ρ }can be deduced from the experiments which ranges from 0.4 to 0.7 in semiconductor QWs [26,27]. Therefore, one determines the relative strength of the RSOI and DSOI from the dc conductivity. In our calculation, we take the electron effective mass m = 0.067m_{e}, the strengths of SOIs α and β are about 1 × 10^{11 }eVm which is the typical strength of SOI in conventional semiconductors [28]. Electrons only occupy the lowest subband in GaAs QW assuming the Fermi wavevector is k_{F }= 0.01 nm^{1}.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we investigate theoretically the effect of the interplay between the Coulomb interaction and the SOIs on the electron ground state and charge transport property of interacting QWs oriented along different crystallographic directions in different planes. We find that the ground state of electrons in the QWs can transit among the different phases, e.g., the SDW, CDW, SS, and MM, by tuning the plane and orientation of the QW, the strengths of SOIs and the Coulomb interaction. The anisotropy of the dc conductivity in an interacting QW is induced by the interplay between the Coulomb interaction and SOIs. This anisotropy enables us to detect the strengths of RSOI and DSOI, which are very important for the comprehensive understanding of spin decoherence and constructing allelectrical spintronic device.
Abbreviations
DSOI: Dresselhaus spinorbit interaction; QWs: quantum wires; RSOI: Rashba spinorbit interaction.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
FC formulated the theory and carried out the calculation. GHZ participated in the interpretation of the results. KC conceived the idea, formulated the theory and participated in the interpretation of the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was supported by the NSFC 10947134, 10974052; the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB933700); the KLLDQSQC QSQC0901 (Hunan Normal University), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department 09C061; and the construct program of the key discipline in Changsha University of Science and Technology.
References

žutić I, Fabian J, Sarma SD: Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications.

Winkler R: SpinOrbit Coupling Effects in TwoDimensional Electron and Hole Systems. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics. Berlin: Springer; 2003.
and the references therein

Rashba EI: Properties of semiconductors with an extermum loop .1. syclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop.
Sov Phys Solid State 1960, 2:1109.
Rashba EI, Sherman EYa: Spinorbital band splitting in symmetric quantum wells, Phys Lett A 1988,129:175

Dresselhaus G: SpinOrbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures.
Phys Rev 1955, 100:580. Publisher Full Text

Luo J, Munekata H, Fang FF, Stiles PJ: Effects of inversion asymmetry on electron energy band structures in GaSb/InAs/GaSb quantum wells.
Phys Rev B 1990, 41:7685. Publisher Full Text

Hu CM, Nitta J, Akazaki T, Takayanagai H, Osaka J, Pfeffer P, Zawadzki W: Zerofield spin splitting in an inverted In_{0.53}Ga_{0.47}As/In_{0.52}Al_{0.48}As heterostructure: Band nonparabolicity influence and the subband dependence.
Phys Rev B 1999, 60:7736. Publisher Full Text

Koga T, Nitta J, Akazaki T, Takayanagi H: Rashba SpinOrbit Coupling Probed by the Weak Antilocalization Analysis in InAlAs/InGaAs/InAlAs Quantum Wells as a Function of Quantum Well Asymmetry.
Phys Rev Lett 2002, 89:046801. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Ganichev SD, Bel'kov VV, Golub LE, Ivchenko EL, Schneider P, Giglberger S, Eroms J, De Boeck J, Borghs G, Wegscheider W, Weiss D, Prettl W: Experimental Separation of Rashba and Dresselhaus Spin Splittings in Semiconductor Quantum Wells.
Phys Rev Lett 2004, 92:256601. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Koralek JD, Weber CP, Orenstein J, Bernevig BA, Zhang SC, Mack S, Awschalom DD: Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells.
Nature 2009, 458:610. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Scheid M, Kohda M, Kunihashi Y, Richter K, Nitta J: AllElectrical Detection of the Relative Strength of Rashba and Dresselhaus SpinOrbit Interaction in Quantum Wires.
Phys Rev Lett 2008, 101:266401. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Wang M, Chang K, Wang LG, Dai N, Peeters FM: Crystallographic plane tuning of charge and spin transport in semiconductor quantum wires.
Nanotechnology 2009, 20:365202. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Luttinger JM: An Exactly Soluble Model of a ManyFermion System.
J Math Phys 1963, 4:1154. Publisher Full Text

Tarucha S, Honda T, Saku T: Reduction of quantized conductance at low temperatures observed in 2 to 10 mlong quantum wires.
Solid State Commun 1995, 94:413.
Levy E, Tsukernik A, Karpovski M, Palevski A, Dwir B, Pelucchi E, Rudra A, Kapon E, Oreg Y: LuttingerLiquid Behavior in Weakly Disordered Quantum Wires, Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97:196802
Publisher Full Text 
Yacoby A, Stormer HL, Wingreen NS, Pfeiffer LN, Baldwin KW, West KW: Nonuniversal Conductance Quantization in Quantum Wires.
Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77:4612. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Zarea M, Sandler N: Nonuniversal Conductance Quantization in Quantum Wires.
Phys Rev Lett 2007, 99:256804. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Chang AM, Pfeiffer LN, West KW: Observation of Chiral Luttinger Behavior in Electron Tunneling into Fractional Quantum Hall Edges.
Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77:2538. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Moroz AV, Samokhin KV, Barnes CHW: Theory of quasionedimensional electron liquids with spinorbit coupling.
Phys Rev B 2000, 62:16900. Publisher Full Text

Iucci A: Correlation functions for onedimensional interacting fermions with spinorbit coupling.
Phys Rev B 2003, 68:075107. Publisher Full Text

Gritsev V, Japaridze GI, Pletyukhov M, Baeriswyl D: Competing Effects of Interactions and SpinOrbit Coupling in a Quantum Wire.
Phys Rev Lett 2005, 94:137207. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Yu Y, Wen YC, Li JB, Su ZB, Chui ST: Luttinger liquid with strong spinorbital coupling and Zeeman splitting in quantum wires.
Phys Rev B 2004, 69:153307. Publisher Full Text

Gogolin AO, Nersesyan AA, Tsvelik AM: Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres; 1998.

Dolcini F, Trauzettel B, Safi I, Grabert H: Transport properties of singlechannel quantum wires with an impurity: Influence of finite length and temperature on average current and noise.
Phys Rev B 2005, 71:165309. Publisher Full Text

Cheng F, Zhou GH: Transport properties for a Luttinger liquid wire in the presence of a timedependent impurity.
Phys Rev B 2006, 73:125335. Publisher Full Text

Eckert D, Ruck K, Wolf M, Krabbes G, Müller KH: Magnetic behavior of the lowdimensional compounds Ba_{2}Cu_{3}O_{4}Cl_{2 }and Ba_{2}Cu_{2}O_{4}Cl_{2}.
J Appl Phys 1998, 83:7240. Publisher Full Text

Gerhardt C, Mütter KH, Kröger H: Metamagnetism in the XXZ model with nexttonearestneighbor coupling.
Phys Rev B 1998, 57:11504. Publisher Full Text

Levy E, Tsukernik A, Karpovski M, Palevski A, Dwir B, Pelucchi E, Rudra A, Kapon E, Oreg Y: LuttingerLiquid Behavior in Weakly Disordered Quantum Wires.
Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97:196802. PubMed Abstract  Publisher Full Text

Steinberg H, Barak G, Yacoby A, Pfeiffer LN, West KW, Halperin BI, Le Hur K: Charge fractionalization in quantum wires.
Nat Phys 2008, 4:116.
and references therein
Publisher Full Text 
Yang W, Chang K: Nonlinear Rashba model and spin relaxation in quantum wells.
Phys Rev B 2006, 74:193314. Publisher Full Text