Table 1 |
|||||
|
Heights and FWHM after a Lorentzian fit of the profiles at each measured position |
|||||
|
Position |
Height 1 (nm) |
Height 2 (nm) |
FWHM 1 (nm) |
FWHM 2 (nm) |
Cumulated FWHM (nm) |
|
|
|||||
|
1. |
6.80* |
61.37 |
61.37 |
||
|
2. |
3.40* |
49.28 |
49.28 |
||
|
3. |
2.70 |
8.30* |
34.58 |
76.56 |
111.14 |
|
4. |
9.00* |
55.61 |
55.61 |
||
|
5. |
1.80 |
6.40* |
21.71 |
84.82 |
106.53 |
|
6. |
4.40* |
10.00 |
47.43 |
93.98 |
141.41 |
|
7. |
2.22* |
53.69 |
53.69 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
The star-marked height profiles correspond to the tip position, and were used for plotting the Raman signal dependence as a function of the height. |
|||||
|
Peica et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011 6:174 doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-174 |
|||||