Table 1 |
|||
| Young’s modulus (E) of different armchair carbon nanotubes from DFT (EDFT) and TB (ETB) calculations | |||
| Nanotube | r(Ǻ) | EDFT (GPa) | ETB (GPa) |
| (5,5) | 3.40 | 969.7 | 983.4 |
| (6,6) | 4.08 | 929.1 | 984.7 |
| (7,7) | 4.76 | 941.6 | 986.0 |
| (8,8) | 5.44 | 962.3 | 989.9 |
r is the tube radius
Liu et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2010 5:478 doi:10.1186/1556-276X-5-478
