www.nanoscalereslett.com

Table 1
Left, LDA calculated bandgaps (LMTO 36, Spin–Orbit effects included) for Γ, XL points for GaAs and Ge Right, QSGW bandgaps for the same points in Ge and GaAs (eV, 0 K), compared with measured values at 0 K. The self-energy was scaled by a factor 0.8, as described in the text. Raw (unscaled) QSGW levels are slightly larger than experiment
	LDA BANDGAP (eV)			QSGWBANDGAP (eV)
	Γ	L	X	Γ		L		X
	Γ	L	X	QSGW	Exp	QSGW	Exp	QSGW	Exp
GaAs (dir.)	0.23	0.75	1.43	1.47	1.52^a	1.73	1.80^a	1.84	1.98^a
Ge (indir)	−0.22	−0.04	0.55	0.94	0.90^b	0.74	0.74^b	1.06	1.09^b

^a Inferred from ellipsometry data in Ref. [45], using the QSGW Γ-X dispersion in the valence band (−3.37 eV)

^b Inferred from ellipsometry data in Ref. [46], using the QSGW Γ-X dispersion in the valence band (−3.98 eV)

Giorgi et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2010 5:469 doi:10.1186/1556-276X-5-469

Table 1