SpringerOpen Newsletter

Receive periodic news and updates relating to SpringerOpen.

Open Access NANO EXPRESS

Low-Temperature Preparation of Superparamagnetic CoFe2O4 Microspheres with High Saturation Magnetization

HongLei Yuan, YongQiang Wang, ShaoMin Zhou*, LiSheng Liu, XiLiang Chen, ShiYun Lou, RuiJian Yuan, YaoMing Hao and Ning Li

Author Affiliations

Key Lab for Special Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Henan University, 475004, Kaifeng, People’s Republic of China

For all author emails, please log on.

Nanoscale Research Letters 2010, 5:1817-1821  doi:10.1007/s11671-010-9718-7


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:


Received:23 May 2010
Accepted:26 July 2010
Published:11 August 2010

© 2010 The Author(s)

Abstract

Based on a low-temperature route, monodispersed CoFe2O4 microspheres (MSs) were fabricated through aggregation of primary nanoparticles. The microstructural and magnetic characteristics of the as-prepared MSs were characterized by X-ray diffraction/photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning/transmitting electron microscopy, and vibrating sample magnetometer. The results indicate that the diameters of CoFe2O4 MSs with narrow size distribution can be tuned from over 200 to ~330 nm. Magnetic measurements reveal these MSs exhibit superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature with high saturation magnetization. Furthermore, the mechanism of formation of the monodispersed CoFe2O4 MSs was discussed on the basis of time-dependent experiments, in which hydrophilic PVP plays a crucial role.

Keywords:
Magnetism; Nanostructure; Superparamagnetism

Introduction

Over the past decades, superparamagnetic (SP) nanostructures of spinel ferrites (MFe2O4: M = Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, etc.) have drawn intense scientific and technological interests because they possess a wide range of applications in magnetic fluid [1-3], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [4,5], and drug delivery technology [6-8]. Recently, spinel cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanostructure materials have been extensively studied because they form a magnetic system which is an ideal candidate toward understanding and controlling magnetic properties at the atomic level through chemical manipulation [9]. Based on different techniques, SP CoFe2O4 nano-scale particles have been synthesized by several research groups [10-13]. Unfortunately, these small nanoparticles, especially those with sizes below 10 nm, have poor magnetic response abilities [14]. The low magnetization properties caused by small size limit their usage in a number of practical applications since they cannot be effectively manipulated by using moderate magnetic fields [15,16]. In order to obtain a high saturation magnetization (Ms), simply making particles larger cannot be an option at all, resulting in a strong aggregation due to the non-SP ferromagnetic attraction [17].

Recently, much effort has been focused on the preparation of large-size SP particles with high Ms using simple composites [18,19]. For example, Lee et al. [18] reported the fabrication of highly uniform SP mesoporous spheres with sub-micrometer scale, composed of silica and CoFe2O4 achieved a high magnetization value. Similar efforts were done by Bao et al. [19] in which controlled growth of SP nanostructures of spherical and rod-like CoFe2O4 nanocrystals. However, their high Ms required a high reaction temperature and expensive high-boiling point toxic solvents, which are disadvantages for their biological applicability. Moreover, such composite nanostructures are incompatible with low expense of preparing procedure. Herein, we report a single-step process for high-performance monodisperse SP CoFe2O4 MSs at low temperature (at only 180°C). As a consequence of the low-temperature synthesis, the as-obtained samples possess a high Ms (over 55 emu/g) and biocompatibility.

Experimental Section

Cobalt acetate [Co(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O], anhydrous ethanol(CH3CH2OH), iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate [Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O], and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, K30) are of analytic grade reagents and purchased without further treatment. In a typical reaction, 2 mmol Co(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O and 4 mmol Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O were dissolved in 35 mL CH3CH2OH forming a reddish brown solution, after which 0.2 g PVP was added. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 30 min and then sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (50 mL capacity). The autoclave was heated to and maintained at 180°C for 12–24 h and then was allowed to cool to room temperature. The dark products were subjected to magnetic decantation, followed by repeated washing with distilled water, ethanol, and acetone. The final products were dried in a vacuum oven at 60°C for 8 h.

Phase and composition analyses of the products were performed by X-ray diffraction/photoelectron spectroscopy [XRD/XPS (Philips X Pert Prodiffractometer with Cu Kα (λ = 1.54056 Å) radiation)/(AXIS ULTRA XPS, Al Kα)]. The size and morphology of the as-synthesized MSs were investigated by using scanning/transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM, JSM5600LV/JEOL100CX-II). The magnetic measurements were carried out by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM).

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows a typical XRD pattern of the as-fabricated sample (reaction for 24 h). All diffraction peaks can be indexed to a simple cubic lattice (FCC), and the positions along with relative intensity of peaks match well with standard CoFe2O4 powder diffraction database (JCPDS File No. 22-1086), indicating that the as-obtained products have an Fd3m cubic spinel structure. According to the Scherrer equation, the average crystallite size which is calculated based on the XRD pattern (311) is approximately 8 nm. In fact, the XRD patterns of the others (reaction for 12 and 36 h) are similar to it (not shown). More accurately, XPS was used to determine its composition. Figure 1b and 1c show the high-resolution XPS spectra of 2p Co and Fe, respectively. The peak at 780.8 eV is from Co2p3/2, with a shake up satellite at 785.9 eV, while the peak at 797.2 eV is caused by Co2p1/2, with a satellite peak at 803.0 eV. The presence of those two peaks and the highly intense satellites near them is consistent with the presence of Co2+ in the high-spin state. All the Fe2p spectra generally show a main peak at a binding energy (BE) of around 710.3 eV, accompanied by a satellite line visible at a BE of around 718.3 eV, only indicative of the presence of Fe3+ cations. Further quantitative analysis finds that the atomic ratio between Co and Fe is about 1:2, which is compatible with the data of XRD.

thumbnailFigure 1. The as-synthesized CoFe2O4 MSs for a XRD pattern, and XPS spectra b Co2p and c Fe2p

The SEM images of the as-synthesized samples obtained at different reaction times are illustrated in Fig. 2a and 2b. It is clear that both of the products have uniform spherical shapes. The average size of the CoFe2O4 MSs is ~220 nm [solvothermal treated for 12 h (Fig. 2a)]. However, when extending the reaction time to 24 h, the average size increases to ~330 nm (as revealed in Fig. 2b). As shown in the corresponding TEM images in Fig. 2c and 2d, these micrometer-sized CoFe2O4 spheres [~220 nm (Fig. 2c) and ~330 nm (Fig. 2d) in diameter, respectively] can clearly be seen. Additionally, an individual sphere is not a single microparticle but the assemblies of small CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (the diameter of ~8 nm), in which the size of primary nanoparticles is in excellent agreement with the XRD results.

thumbnailFigure 2. SEM/TEM images of products prepared at different reaction time: a/c 12 h, b/d 24 h

To obtain a better understanding of the formation and evolution of CoFe2O4 MSs along with the reaction time, that the reaction duration was further extended to 36 h was carried out. The MSs were evacuated resulting in octahedral-shaped CoFe2O4 particles, which are confirmed by the SEM image (Fig. 3a) and TEM image (Fig. 3b). As a consequence, a proposed mechanism of formation and evolution of the CoFe2O4 MSs is sketched in Fig. 4. It is well known that PVP can selectively absorb on a certain crystal facet of the as-prepared primary building blocks such as nanoparticles, nanosheets, nanoplates, nanorods, and so on [20-23]. In our experimental system, PVP surfactant contributes not only to preventing these primary building blocks from entropy-driven random aggregation but also to controlling the formation of the regular geometry. The formation and evolution of MSs seems to be as follows: at first, this CoFe2O4 phase undergoes consequent nucleation and growth around the entire surface stabilized by PVP. In the subsequent process, driven by the minimization of the total energy of the system, the small primary CoFe2O4 nanoparticles aggregated together to form three-dimensional (3D) spheres. Ostwald ripening occurred under solvothermal conditions, resulting in the formation of CoFe2O4 spheres from small grows into larger due to isotropic growth. The octahedral shape of the product obtained by reaction for 36 h may be explained by combination of thermodynamic aspects of crystal growth and the selective adsorption model of surfactants on different crystallographic facets [24,25]. Moreover, the structures may be deduced that development of the (111) facets was handicapped by the adsorbed PVP surfactant on these facets. Of course, convincing explanation on the mechanism of MSs is our further work.

thumbnailFigure 3. a SEM/b TEM images of studied samples with 36 h reaction time

thumbnailFigure 4. Schematic illustration of the formation and evolution of CoFe2O4 MSs along with the reaction time

The magnetic behavior of CoFe2O4 MSs is very important for practical applications. The room-temperature magnetization curves (Fig. 5a, 5b) display the two relatively high Ms values of 41.2 (taken from 220 nm) and 55.2 emu/g (330 nm), respectively. Both values are, however, somewhat lower than the bulk value (71.2 emu/g) [18,19]. The hysteresis loop shows essentially no coercivity (HC) for the smaller size samples (220 nm) and negligible value of 27 Oe (larger size specimens, a diameter of 330 nm), suggesting that improved coalescence of the crystallites in the nanostructures results in increased magnetic coupling and higher magnetization. According to the results of XRD and TEM observations, the average size of primary crystals is about 8 nm, smaller than the SP critical size of CoFe2O4[26,27]. So it is reasonable that the self-assembled cobalt ferrite MSs reveal SP behavior even though their sphere size exceeds 200 nm. The stabilization of the MSs in distilled water thanks to the surfaces capped of hydrophilic PVP. Slight agitation can bring the MSs to back into the aqueous solution when the magnet is removed (Fig. 5c) although these magnetic MSs can be completely separated from the solution when the solution is subjected to an external magnetic field within minutes, as shown in Fig. 5d. It can be obviously seen that the CoFe2O4 MSs have rapid magnetic response ability at room temperature, as well as, highly monodispersed, and biocompatible.

thumbnailFigure 5. RT magnetization curves for the of CoFe2O4 MSs with different reaction time: a 12 h, b 24 h (The inset shows enlarged magnetic hysteresis loops at low applied fields); photographs of CoFe2O4 MSs dispersion in a vial, c without magnetic field, d with magnetic field for 1 min

Conclusion

In summary, SP CoFe2O4 MSs have been synthesized through a simple surfactants-assisted solvothermal method at a relatively low temperature. All of the reactants are common reagents and inexpensive, as well as environment benign. The as-prepared MSs, composed of about 8-nm CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, have uniform sizes (diameters up to several hundred nanometers), high Ms and well water-dispersible make them good candidates for not only in advanced magnetic materials and ferrofluid technology, but also in biomedical fields such as biomolecular separations, targeted drug delivery, as well as magnetic resonance imaging.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (No. 2008 HASTIT002), Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province (No. 094100510015), and by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 20971036.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Skumiel A:

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2006, 307:85.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpsF2jt7o%3D]; Bibcode number [2006JMMM..307...85S]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Neveu S, Bee A, Robineau M, Talbot D:

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.. 2002, 255:293.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XovVyhu7s%3D]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Shi H, Duan Y:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2009, 4:480.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvVSjt78%3D]; Bibcode number [2009NRL.....4..480S]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Lee JH, Huh YM, Jun YW, Seo JW, Jang JT, Song HT, Kim S, Cho EJ, Yoon HG, Suh JS:

    Nat. Med.. 2007, 13:95.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhvFWjtw%3D%3D]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Casula MF, Floris P, Innocenti C, Lascialfari A, Marinone M, Corti M, Sperling RA, Parak WJ, Sangregorio C:

    Chem. Mater.. 2010, 22:1739.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXnt1Smug%3D%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Cao S, Zhu YJ, Ma MY, Li L, Zhang L:

    J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112:1851.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXos1WhsA%3D%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Xie J, Peng S, Brower N, Pourmand N, Wang SX, Sun SH:

    Pure Appl. Chem.. 2006, 78:1003.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvVOmsrw%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Ghosh S, GhoshMitra S, Cai T, Diercks DR, Mills NC, Hynds DL:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2010, 5:195.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs12j]; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..195G]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Liu C, Zou B, Rondinone AJ, Zhang ZJ:

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2000, 122:6263.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjvFKqt78%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Choi E, Ahn Y, Kim S, An D, Kang K, Lee B, Baek K, Oak H:

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2003, 262:L198.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjvValsb0%3D]; Bibcode number [2003JMMM..262L.198C]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson D, Raoux S, Rice P, Wang S, Li G:

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2004, 126:273.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1yms7o%3D]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Lee Y, Lee J, Bae C, Park J, Noh H, Park J, Hyeon T:

    Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2005, 15:503.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivVamurY%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Wu W, He QG, Jiang CZ:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2008, 3:397.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVyhtrvP]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Tackett RJ, Bhuiya AW, Botez CE:

    Nanotechnology. 2009, 20:445705.

    Bibcode number [2009Nanot..20R5705T]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Neuberger T, Schopf B, Hofmann H, Hofmann M, von Rechenberg B:

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2005, 293:483.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXktVagsbo%3D]; Bibcode number [2005JMMM..293..483N]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Xuan SH, Wang YJ, Yu JC, Leung KC:

    Chem. Mater.. 2008, 21:5079. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Granitzer P, Rumpf K, Roca A, Morales M, Poelt P, Albu M:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2010, 5:374.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsV2ls70%3D]; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..374G]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Lee K, Kim S, Kang D, Lee J, Lee Y, Kim W, Cho D, Lim H, Kim J, Hur N:

    Chem. Mater.. 2008, 20:6738.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1Ohs7jM]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Bao NZ, Shen LM, Wang YA, Ma JX, Mazumdar D, Gupta A:

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2009, 131:12900.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVWntbbM]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Wei Y, Li L, Yang X, Pan G, Yan G, Yu X:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2010, 5:433.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsV2lsLw%3D]; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..433W]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Liu ZP, Li S, Yang Y, Hu ZK, Peng S, Liang JB, Qian YT:

    New J. Chem.. 2003, 27:1748.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntlamtg%3D%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Yu W, Xie HQ, Chen LF, Li Y, Zhang C:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2009, 4:465.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvVSjtrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2009NRL.....4..465Y]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Zheng YH, Cheng Y, Wang YS, Zhou LH, Bao F, Jia C:

    J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110:8284.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XjtV2jtLY%3D]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Yang HM, Ouyang J, Tang AD:

    J. Phys. Chem. B. 2007, 111:8006.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmslyqsLo%3D]

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Zhao LJ, Zhang HJ, Xing Y, Song SY, Yu SY, Shi WD, Guo XM, Yang JH, Lei YQ, Cao F:

    Chem. Mater.. 2008, 20:198.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVWqsLjE]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Rajendran M, Pullar RC, Bhattacharya AK, Das D, Chintalapudi SN, Majumdar CK:

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.. 2001, 232:71.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksVWjs74%3D]; Bibcode number [2001JMMM..232...71R]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Gu ZJ, Xiang X, Fan GL, Li F:

    J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112:18459.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlWqtLzK]

    OpenURL