Open Access Nano Express

High-yield Synthesis of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube by Mechanothermal Method

SA Manafi*, MH Amin, MR Rahimipour, E Salahi and A Kazemzadeh

Author Affiliations

Ceramic Department, Materials and Energy Research Center, P.O. Box 14155-4777, Tehran, Iran

For all author emails, please log on.

Nanoscale Research Letters 2009, 4:296-302  doi:10.1007/s11671-008-9240-3


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:


Received:11 July 2008
Accepted:30 December 2008
Published:22 January 2009

© 2009 to the authors

Abstract

This study reports on the mechanothermal synthesis of multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) from elemental graphite powder. Initially, high ultra-active graphite powder can be obtained by mechanical milling under argon atmosphere. Finally, the mechanical activation product is heat-treated at 1350°C for 2–4 h under argon gas flow. After heat-treatment, active graphite powders were successfully changed into MWCNTs with high purity. The XRD analyses showed that in the duration 150 h of milling, all the raw materials were changed to the desired materials. From the broadening of the diffraction lines in the XRD patterns, it was concluded that the graphite crystallites were nanosized, and raising the milling duration resulted in the fineness of the particles and the increase of the strain. The structure and morphology of MWCNTs were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The yield of MWCNTs was estimated through SEM and TEM observations of the as-prepared samples was to be about 90%. Indeed, mechanothermal method is of interest for fundamental understanding and improvement of commercial synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs). As a matter of fact, the method of mechanothermal guarantees the production of MWCNTs suitable for different applications.

Keywords:
Carbon nanotubes; Mechanothermal; Nanotechnology; Advanced materials; Outstanding structure

Introduction

Since the time of discovery by Iijima [1], there has been much interest in the synthesis and physical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) due to their important applications. For example, CNTs can be used as electrochemical devices [2], for hydrogen storage [3], field emission devices [4], and nanotweezers [5]. Various methods have been developed for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes, including metalcatalyzed chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [6-8], arc evaporation [9], laser ablation of carbon [10], catalytic decomposition [11], HiPCO process [12] or pulsed laser vaporization (PLV) [13]. There are growing experimental evidences, showing that the formation of both multiwalled and single-walled nanotubes involves a solid-phase transformation in the gas-phase synthesis processes [14-16]. It implies that a direct synthesis of CNTs by a transformation of solid carbons under mild conditions is possible; if accessible, then it would be quite beneficial for a large-scale synthesis due to the intrinsic high-feeding- density characteristic of the solid-phase reaction process.

Recently, successful syntheses of CNTs by the solid-phase transformation of granular carbon materials, such as carbon black, amorphous carbon, and fullerene soot, achieved at extremely high temperatures (2000–3000°C) have been reported [15-23]. However, further technical improvement for practical access and clear understanding of the transformation mechanism for rational process design and control are still necessary and challenging tasks. Zhenping Zhu et al. recently synthesized MWCNTs by the solid-phase transformation of metal-containing glass-like carbon nanoparticles by heating at temperatures of 800–1000°C [24]. More recently, we have suggested that using washable supported catalysts is accompanied by valuable advantages and with an extraordinary structure [25,26].

Herein, we study mechanothermal method for synthesizing MWCNTs that consists of mechanical milling (for obtaining amorphous carbon nanostructure using ultra-high purity graphite powders) and thermal annealing processes (for transforming into nanotubes via carbon nanostructure and structural crystallization). The latest finding of this article demonstrates that this simple technique is a promising tool to synthesize the MWCNTs with ultra-high purity and high yield without a need for specialized equipment and or a multi-step purification process to eliminate the amorphous carbon and MWCNTs.

Experimental Details

Elemental graphite flakes (99.9% <100 μm) with a purity of 99.8% were mechanically ground in a purified argon atmosphere. Four grams of 10 steel balls of diameter 15 mm were used in the mechanical activation (MA) process. The ball-to-powder weight ratio was kept at 20:1. The MA was carried out at ambient temperature and at a rotational speed (cup speed) of 700 rpm in a planetary ball mill. The MA process was interrupted at regular intervals with a small amount of the mechanically activated powder being taken out of the vial to study changes in the microstructures at selected milling duration. The vial containing the powders and the balls were evacuated by a rotary pump and then back-filled with pure argon gas (99.99%) in a glove box. The final gas pressure in the vial was kept at 0.1 MPa. After full amorphization, the highly chemically active carbon powders were annealed at different temperatures to investigate the formation of MWCNTs. The crystal phase was determined with powder X-ray diffraction. For these experiments, a Siemens diffractometer (30 kV and 25 mA) with the Kα1, radiation of copper (λ = 1.5406 Ǻ), was used. The structural and compositional information of the product materials was obtained with scanning election microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX, XL30), field emission transmission electron microscopy, and selected area electron diffraction (FETEM/SAED, Philips CM200 transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV). Specific surface areas (SSAs) of carbon/CNTs were also measured by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The BET surface areas, SBET, of the samples were determined from N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms obtained at 77 K using an ASAP 2010 surface area analyzer. The BET method is the most widely used procedure for the determination of the surface areas of solid materials and involves the use of the BET equation:

wherein W is the weight of gas adsorbed at a relative pressure of P/P0 and Wm is the weight of adsorbate constituting one monolayer of surface coverage. The term C, the BET C constant, is related to the energy of adsorption in the first adsorbed layer, and consequently, its value is an indication of the magnitude of the adsorbent–adsorbate interactions. When the range of P/P0 is 0.05–0.35, a line will be obtained. Through the slope and intercept, the adsorbate monolayer saturation amount (Vm) can be obtained. The BET surface area equation is:

where N0 is Avogadro’s number and σ is the cross-sectional area of a single molecule. Raman spectra at room temperature under ambient condition using an Almega Raman spectrometer with an Ar+ at an excitation wavelength of 514.5 nm were obtained. The crystalline size, D, was estimated by the equation from Williamson-Hall [27]:

where λ is the wavelength of the X-ray, β the full width at half-maximum (FWHM), θ the Bragg angle, and ε is the microstrain.

Results and Discussion

As previously discussed, the size of the carbon particles is one of the important factors for the formation of the CNTs [28]. It is predicted that nanosized carbon particles could catalyze the growth of CNTs. The nanoparticle size of carbon-milled product was analyzed using a zeta-sizer method. These measurements reveal the particles to be of highly wide distribution (Fig. 1). The milled graphite powders were particles with diameters in two ranges, i.e., from 7–100 nm and 100–400 nm.

thumbnailFigure 1. The nanoparticle size of milled carbon measured by zeta-sizer

The XRD patterns of graphite powder mechanically mixed in argon atmosphere for several activation periods are shown in Fig. 2, where the patterns at an activating time of 0 h (before MA) were reduced to one-fifth because of the strong diffraction intensity of the elemental powder. The constitution of this starting powder corresponds to the elemental graphite powder. The diffraction intensities drastically decreased after MA. The diffraction peaks corresponding to the graphite (particularly, the peak at about 2θ = 26.6°) almost disappeared at an activating time of 10 h. The crystalline size of the graphite after MA for 5 h is approximately D = 30.1 nm whereas that before MA is approximately D = 31.1 (Table 1) so that about ε = 0.041% microstrain has occurred. An additional MA process in the argon atmosphere (Fig. 2), diffraction intensities corresponding to the graphite decreasing gradually with increasing activating times, at the diffraction peaks at around 2θ = 26.6° can not be eliminated after an activating time of 100 h, suggesting that the formation of an amorphous-like phase or very fine particles has been strongly enhanced in the argon atmosphere after an activating time of 150 h. Figure 3 shows the transmission electron micrograph (Fig. 3a) and SAED (Fig. 3b) patterns of graphite nanostructures synthesized according to the method described above. It is readily observed that the nanostructures are in a high ultra-fine dispersion and the average crystalline size is 10 nm. Meanwhile, the electron diffraction pattern reveals that the carbon nanostructures have an amorphous structure (Fig. 3b). At the same time, this result is consistent with the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern. We believe that the very small size and the amorphous structure are due to the high-energy ball milling of the graphite powders activated by planetary mill. Also, Jiang and Chen [28] recently developed a thermodynamic quantitative model to describe the phase transitions of nanocarbon as functions of its size and temperature through systematically considering the effects of surface stresses and surface energies. The fine nanosize amorphous structure of pure carbon nanostructures is thermodynamically unstable, owing to the high amount of free energy. Therefore, crystallization at a temperature regime might be expected.

thumbnailFigure 2. The X-ray diffraction spectra of mechanically alloyed graphite powders at different milling times

Table 1. Characteristics of different samples used for investigation during milling

thumbnailFigure 3. aHigh resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM), andbselected area electron diffraction (SAED)

The milled powders had an average crystalline size of about 5–10 nm as determined by the Williamson-Hall method as shown in Table 1. Crystalline size values determined in this way may be low when the concentration of defects in the sample is higher compared to that in the reference large-particulate powder. The BET areas are vastly different for all the samples ranging between 5.5 and 211.2 m2/g as presented in Table 1. In the steady state, the BET surface area of the mechanically activated powders was determined to be about 211.2 m2/g for several samples (C200, C210, C220and …). Measuring the surface area of carbon nanostructures via nitrogen adsorption by the Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) method revealed a specific surface area of 211.2 m2/g which seems relevant for surface area-dependent applications such as diffusion process. Assuming that all the particles are spherical and have the same theoretical density, and form:dBET = 6/S · ρ, whereSis the surface area and ρ is the particle density (2.1 g/cm3for graphite), a BET particle diameter,dBET, of about 20 nm is found for these nanoparticles. These results are also consistent with the HRTEM image observations. Therefore, the obtained results of specific area (SA) and crystalline size (D) for milled graphite indicate that graphite particles are highly chemically active.

The HRTEM micrographs of the powders mechanically milled for 150 h in argon gas atmosphere as shown in Fig. 4, show that mechanically activated powders are an ultra-fine spherical particle powder with approximately 100 ± 20 nm in size. Because of being highly chemically active carbon atoms, these are strongly agglomerated. On the other hand, the amorphous structure of pure graphite nanoparticles is thermodynamically unstable, owing to the high amount of free energy.

thumbnailFigure 4. Mechanically activated graphite powders treated for 150 h in argon gas atmosphere

Figure 5a–d shows extraordinary morphologies of the as-prepared MWCNTs. Interestingly, the carbon crystallites self-organized to form tubular assemblies or “spaghetti” with a peculiar appearance. Under the reported conditions, the CNT products are all in this morphology (100%), with diameters ranging from 20 ± 10 nm and lengths of several millimeters. The SEM analyses have shown that a majority (i.e., about 90%) of the synthesized powder at 1350°C correspond to spring-like MWCNTs (Fig. 5c–d).

thumbnailFigure 5. SEM different images of mechanically activated graphite powders for 150 h after annealing at different temperatures:alow magnification, 1350°C;bhigh magnification, 1350°C;clow magnification, 1380°C; anddhigh magnification 1380°C

Figure 6shows the transmission electron micrograph and electron diffraction of the nanostructures milled as described above. The HRTEM was employed to further characterize the structure of synthesized powder through mechanothermal method. TEM examinations of this sample indicate that they are nanotubes, in which the graphic layers are not clear and have small hollow cores. To prepare transmission electron microscope samples, the nanotubes were transferred to a carbon-coated copper gird. A drop of alcohol was first added to the nanofiber film. Then, the film was scratched by a pair of tweezers attached to the carbon-coated copper gird. Most of the nanotubes are bent and have a uniform diameter along its entire length, indicating the growth anisotropy in the one-dimensional is strictly maintained throughout the process. Finally, the HRTEM microscope image shows that individual graphitic carbon is a CNT with a highly uniform structure (Fig. 6a). The TEM analyses have shown that a majority (i.e., about 90%) of the synthesized powder at 1350°C correspond to spaghetti-like carbon nanofibers (Fig. 6a).

thumbnailFigure 6. TEM images of mechanically activated graphite powders for 150 h after annealing ata1350°C,b1380°C

Figure 6b shows HRTEM images of individual MWCNTs (C150). The average diameter of resulting MWCNTs with a length of about several millimeters is in the range of 30–70 nm at the open and closed end. Also, we found that the carbon nanotube has a spring-like shape. The SAED pattern (not shown) exhibits a pair of small but strong arcs for (002), together with a ring for (100), and a pair of weak arcs for (004) diffractions. The appearance of (002) diffractions as a pair of arcs indicates some orientation of the (002) planes occurring in the carbon tubes [29].

The Raman spectrum is shown in Fig. 7, displaying the characteristically wide D- and G-bands at around 1360 and 1590 cm−1, respectively, typical of amorphous carbons or disordered graphite [30-32]. The peak at 1581 cm−1 (G-band) corresponds to a E2g mode of graphite and is related to the vibration of sp2-bonded carbon atoms in a two-dimensional hexagonal lattice, such as that found in a graphite layer [33]. Nanotubes with concentric multiwalled layers of hexagonal carbon lattice display the same vibration [34]. The D-band at around 1360 cm−1 is associated with vibrations of carbon atoms with dangling bonds in plane terminations of disordered graphite or glassy carbons. After treatment, the D-band nearly disappeared and the G-band became more sharpened, and so the relative intensity of the G-band with respect to the D-band increased very significantly. The inverse of the ID/IG intensity ratio between G and D bands is an usual measurement of the graphitic ordering and may also indicate the approximate layer size in the hexagonal plane, La, [35] which in this case is related to the length of pristine (defect-free) graphitic multiwalls. The ID/IG ratio in the treated material is ~0.03, compared to a value of ~0.9 in the pre-treated material. The calculation using the relationship La 44(ID/IG)−1 yields values of around 1.5 μm for the treated sample, which are in good agreement with the maximum lengths of MWCNTs observed in TEM images. The sharp decrease in the value of ID/IG indicates that the number of sp2-bonded carbon atoms without dangling bonds has increased at the expense of disordered carbon. The low ratio of ID/IG is characteristic of a graphite lattice with perfect two-dimensional order in the basal plane. The spectrum in Fig. 7 indicates a nearly defect-free lattice ordering, and reveals that the multiwalls forming the nanotubes have a perfect lattice without defects, edges, or plane terminations, as seen in Fig. 7. The crystallinity of mechanothermal MWCNTs is similar to or higher than in multiwall nanotubes developed using evaporation methods, for which ID/IG ratios are typically ~0.10.

thumbnailFigure 7. Raman spectra of the obtained MWCNTs

Conclusions

In summary, we have postulated a simple method for producing high-yield MWCNTs under mechanothermal conditions. Elemental graphite powder was milled in a planetary ball mill at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. Finally, after annealing at 1350°C, we obtained high-yield MWCNTs. This method also presents a facile route to high-yield MWCNTs without complex purification processes. The yield and good quality of MWCNTs obtained by mechanothermal makes it a suitable promising method of synthesis for the production of MWCNTs or other graphitic nanocarbons. Indeed, because of the simplicity and high yield of this route, it may potentially be applied on the scale of industrial production.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Tarbit Modarres University for access to Raman spectroscopy and their technical support. In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Hesari for investigating TEM image, Professor Torabi for helping in the preparation of this article, and Mr Jabbari for performing the experimental tests.

References

  1. Iijima S:

    Nature. 1991, 354:56.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK38Xmt1Ojtg%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1991Natur.354...56I]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Baughman RH, Cui CX, Zakhidov AA, Iqbal Z, Barisci JN, Spinks GM, Wallace GG, et al.:

    Science. 1999, 284:1340.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjs1Wjtb4%3D]; Bibcode number [1999Sci...284.1340B]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Liu C, Fan YY, Liu M, Cong HT, Cheng HM, Dresselhaus MS:

    Science. 1999, 286:1127.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnt1Kltrw%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Shim M, Javey A, Kam NWS, Dai HJ:

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2001, 123:11512.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnvVGnurk%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Kim P, Lieber CM:

    Science. 1999, 286:2148.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXotFGrtrY%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Peigney A, Coquay P, Flahaut E, Vandenberghe RE, De Grave E, Laurent C:

    J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001, 105:9699.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXmslOgsrg%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Jian SR, Chen YT, Wang CF, Wen HC, Chiu WM, Yang CS:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2008, 3:230.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVyhtrzO]; Bibcode number [2008NRL.....3..230J]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Shaijumon MM, Leela Mohana Reddy A, Ramaprabhu S:

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2007, 2:75.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXktVart74%3D]; Bibcode number [2007NRL.....2...75S]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Bethune DS, Kiang CH, de Vries MS, Gorman G, Savoy R, Vazquez J, Beyers R:

    Nature. 1993, 363:605.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXltVOrs7s%3D]; Bibcode number [1993Natur.363..605B]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Scott CD, Arepalli S, Nikolaev P, Smalley RE:

    Appl. Phys. A. 2001, 72:573.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjvFGjtLk%3D]; Bibcode number [2001ApPhA..72..573S]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Joseyacaman M, Mikyoshida M, Rendon L, Santiesteban JG:

    Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1993, 62:657.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXhtlKmurs%3D]; Bibcode number [1993ApPhL..62..657J]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Nikolaev P, Bronikowski MJ, Bradley RK, Rohmund F, Colbert DT, Smith KA, Smalley RE:

    Chem. Phys. Lett.. 1999, 313:91.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnvFWlur4%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Liu J, Rinzler AG, Dai H, Hafner JH, Bradley RK, Boul PG, Lu AH, et al.:

    Science. 1998, 280:1253.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjt1GqtrY%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Du GX, Feng SA, Zhao JH, Song C, Bai SL, Zhu ZP:

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2006, 128:15405.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFykurzE]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Harris PJF, Tsang SC, Claridge JB, Green MLH:

    J. Chem. Soc.. 1994, 90:2799.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXmvFWiu7s%3D]

    OpenURL

  16. Harris PJF:

    Carbon. 2007, 45:229.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xht12gtr7F]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Moreno JMC, Yoshimura M:

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2001, 123:741.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhsVamtQ%3D%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Seelan S, Hwang DW, Hwang LP, Sinha AK:

    Vacuum. 2004, 75:105.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXkvVeit7o%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Hu JQ, Bando Y, Xu FF, Li YB, Zhan JH, Xu JY, et al.:

    Adv. Mater.. 2004, 16:153.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtlWgu70%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Hu JQ, Bando Y, Zhan JH, Zhi CY, Xu FF, Golberg D:

    Adv. Mater.. 2006, 18:197. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Ugarte D:

    Carbon. 1994, 32:1245.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXitFels7k%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Hsu WK, Hare JP, Terrones M, Kroto HW, Walton DRM, Harris PJF:

    Nature. 1995, 377:687.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXovFygtLc%3D]; Bibcode number [1995Natur.377..687H]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Doherty SP, Buchholz DB, Li BJ, Chang RPH:

    J. Mater. Res.. 2003, 18:941.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXivVeltLc%3D]; Bibcode number [2003JMatR..18..941D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Du G, Song C, Zhao J, Feng S, Zhu Z:

    Carbon. 2008, 46:92.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFWru7k%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Manafi SA, Nadali H, Irani HR:

    Mater. Lett.. 2008, 62:4175.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXps1emt70%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Eftekhari A, Manafi SA, Moztarzadeh F:

    Chem. Lett.. 2006, 35:138.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XotFCksQ%3D%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Williamson GK, Hall WH:

    Acta Metall.. 1953, 1:22.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaG3sXitFCquw%3D%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Jiang Q, Chen ZP:

    Carbon. 2006, 44:79.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFSmt7vE]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Kyotani T, Tsai LF, Tomita A:

    Chem. Mater.. 1996, 8:2109.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK28XksFahsrk%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Dyke CA, Tour JM:

    Chem. Eur. J.. 2004, 10:812.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvVKrt78%3D]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Jorio A, Souza Filho AG, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS, Swan AK, Unlu MS, Goldberg BB, et al.:

    Phys. Rev. B. 2002, 65:155412.

    Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65o5412J]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  32. Jorio A, Saito R, Hafner JH, Lieber CM, Hunter M, McClure T, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS:

    Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2001, 86:1118.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXosFarug%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2001PhRvL..86.1118J]

    Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Lamy de la Chapell M, Lefrant S, Journet C, Maser W, Bernier P:

    Carbon. 1998, 36:705. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Kasuya A, Sasaki Y:

    Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1997, 78:44347. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Tuinstra F, Koening JLJ:

    Chem. Phys.. 1970, 53:1126.

    COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaE3cXks1SqtLc%3D]

    OpenURL